Gingerbeardman
Executive Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2018
- Messages
- 5,472
- Reaction score
- 1,174
And here I was accused of blaming the victim when I suggested Zarnicate get a better attorney.
Boyos, are you not going to call him out for victim blaming?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
And here I was accused of blaming the victim when I suggested Zarnicate get a better attorney.
Boyos, are you not going to call him out for victim blaming?
Well seeing as I have not even paid attention to that that I can recall..... I'm the wrong guy to ask.I actually asked a legit question. How are you not victim blaming.
There cannot be any sort of double standards here, can there? No way.
The prevailing global pattern is that woman initiate most divorces, keep the children and fleece the men. Judges tend to side with woman as a shortcut to pulling all the emotional teeth needed to see which parent is the most crazy. The assumption made is that woman are naturally suited to child-rearing, which is true but only when they are properly supported from the outside.... basically a case of kneejerk judgements without thinking it through. It is further assumed that the only outside support needed is money which is why the Judges feel fine with men being fleeced. It's a easily repeatable stereotype with a few exceptions.Please explain how believing the judge is biased is not an assumption?
Well seeing as I have not even paid attention to that that I can recall..... I'm the wrong guy to ask.
The prevailing global pattern is that woman initiate most divorces,
Or even worse, she has read the MRA sites, she claims she is not a feminist and she still actually believes this tripe that she spews onto the thread.I am beginning to suspect @Emjay of simply being bored and trolling....
You realise that's true for both sides of the wall, right?
Even if there are actual problems, in most cases divorce is not the correct answer. It's the easy answer.Increase in divorce rates are certainly a problem. But just because the women initiate the most or are the plaintiff in most cases doesn't mean she is in the wrong. It actually point to the men being the problem in most cases.
That is true, but it is mostly their own fault for having unreasonable standards. You see plenty of losers only interested in women that's at least a 7/10 when they themselves are 3/10.
The easiest way to get sex is to know what league you are playing in, and somehow some of these guys haven't learned this important life lesson yet.
We certainly need some qualifying criteria for giving people votes. But I don't think there's any reasonable argument to decide that on gender.
I have empathy. It must really suck to be an incel and I feel sorry for them. That's part of the reason for my comments. I'm only trying to help them. Some of the arguments like above contain small snippets of truth, but it's mostly BS.
Yes and no..... you will have to supply the corresponding nonsense term you seem to be referring to.You realise that's true for both sides of the wall, right?
No, only one side of the wall is trying to summon white knights.You realise that's true for both sides of the wall, right?
I think that if you were actually capable of responding to the points that were put to you on the merits, we would be having a very different conversation.I think you have mistaken MyBB for the Incel forum.
And saying men cannot control themselves if they do not have sex is very degrading, and feeds into all the stereotypes about men.
It depends on the environment actually, men need sex to correctly function, their response to the loss of control that comes from this appatite not being fed is the issue. Some react so badly they get violent others simply loose a degree of motor control (i.e. they get twitchy).... this IS a real thing. No it's not an excuse that's not what I am saying.
Men subjected to long periods of being deprived of sex also start getting irrational, which explains incel instability.
Yes, but that is a result of society moving away from traditional religious values, not feminism.Even if there are actual problems, in most cases divorce is not the correct answer. It's the easy answer.
Yes. Obviously you were. I still decided to comment on it semi seriously.I was being facetious and more commenting on the stupid posts in this thread.
And saying men cannot control themselves if they do not have sex is very degrading, and feeds into all the stereotypes about men.
But, since gender based stereotypes are now ok with this lot, I guess I shouldn't call you out on it.
What difference does it make? You're still reacting with butthurt 3 days after the fact because you were called out for making unfounded accusations out of ignorance, even after it was shown that your accusations were just plain wrongYou keep making up these wild claims with ZERO evidence. I even looked for something to back this up, and found nothing. So, happy hunting.
What the hell is wild about it? It's obvious to any man that has been subjected to it.You keep making up these wild claims with ZERO evidence. I even looked for something to back this up, and found nothing. So, happy hunting.
Partially true, feminism added fuel to the fire.Yes, but that is a result of society moving away from traditional religious values, not feminism.
What the hell is wild about it? It's obvious to any man that has been subjected to it?
Biologically speaking what happens is testosterone levels rise naturally in men, sex lowers them. These results spoken of happen because without sex or permanently doing physical labour (or running around like a energetic idiot) there is nothing that can actually counter-act the rising testosterone.
Woman don't naturally produces testosterone at NEARLY the same levels as men so they generally have no problem with chastity forever if need be. Men with excessive testosterone production also are more likely to cheat than other men because it's a physical drive that is too strong in them.
Remember for men sex is more physical than emotional, for woman it's the other way around.
What difference does it make? You're still reacting with butthurt 3 days after the fact because you were called out for making unfounded accusations out of ignorance, even after it was shown that your accusations were just plain wrong
(https://mybroadband.co.za/forum/threads/men-are-screwed-rule-43.1042937/post-24064065). Someone bringing evidence isn't gonna change your mind.![]()