Men are Screwed (rule 43)

[technofool]

Nothing worse than feminist single mothers. The damage they do to their children's perception of healthy relationships is a cancer.

Well my mom wasn't single for the first 8 years but she was a committed feminist. She did me a hellava favour because I saw the entitled bs of the perpetual victims early on. Always demanding, always complaining, never responsible for anything. Men are nothing more than servants in the lives of feminists.

 

[technofool]

Oh, sorry, I thought this was a pity party. I should have rather mentioned domestic violence levels and the high rate of absentee fathers.

That is a rather callous attitude. Domestic violence occurs at roughly equal rates between couples these days. I've worked in trauma over the weekends and the broken beat up people are mostly males. The majority of the gabillions of female victims of "gender based violence" don't report to the trauma centres it seems.

At least 70% for divorces are brought by women who feel they rather want the guy's money without his schit. So the father may not be absent by choice.

 

[technofool]

All single moms are single due to their own choices?

A man who considers a relationship with a single mom / divorcee mom is blissfully ignorant that children always come first whether they are yours or someone else's kids. The gorgeous single mom might be the most important person in his life but he will never be more than second fiddle in her life after the kids.
It is sad when a man is cucked by another man but it is truly tragically miserable when a beta man is cucked by a child and by his own choice or ignorance.

 

[Emjay]

That is a rather callous attitude. Domestic violence occurs at roughly equal rates between couples these days. I've worked in trauma over the weekends and the broken beat up people are mostly males. The majority of the gabillions of female victims of "gender based violence" don't report to the trauma centres it seems.

At least 70% for divorces are brought by women who feel they rather want the guy's money without his schit. So the father may not be absent by choice.

Women beat men at the same rate men beat woman? A link to that source.

 

[technofool]

Women beat men at the same rate men beat woman? A link to that source.

Studies to gather data on male domestic violence victims are rarely funded.

https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-r...olence-awareness-month-the-invisible-victims/

https://www.avoiceformen.com/featur...tandards-shackles-for-men-chuckles-for-women/

https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/the-state-of-play-for-men-domestic-violence/

@Emjay You asked for links and now that you have seen the links, has it changed your mind?

 

[technofool]

Sadly I have to confess that I have mixed feelings about this miserable state of affairs. This is not a new problem and the men who now profess injustice are a little to blame I feel. Ignorance of the facts has never been a valid defense, just ask any magistrate. Nobody is forced to get married, and not knowing what that life-long contract entails is your own oversight.

I believe this situation started in the early 1800's with the suffragettes. Men had to subject them selves to sacrificing their lives in war in defense of their country to earn the right to vote. Women just demanded the vote and got it free of any sacrifice, any duties or any responsibilities.
Then in 1820 the men who made laws decided for the first time that not everybody was equal in front of the law. They declared a law to discriminate in favour of convicted women not to be flogged but to continue to flog convicted men. This was at a time when the suffragettes were demanding that all jobs and academics and public position be open to women on the grounds that they were equal to men in all regards. Except of course when it came to the pain of flogging which was too much for the fragile feminine sensitivities.

It was men who opened the work-place, effected lesser sentences on women criminals, crafted the marriage laws in favour of women. It's mostly our own fault we are in the mess we find ourselves and we if even speak out against it or we are immediatly branded as misogynists. We have royally snookered ourselves behind a big fat feminist 8-ball.

 

[Immortal_Souljah]

Men are checking out because just taking to much cr@p:

The Sexodus, Part 1: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society

"My generation of boys is f**ked," says Rupert, a young German video game enthusiast I've been getting to know over the past few months. "Marriage is |

www.breitbart.com

"Social commentators, journalists, academics, scientists and young men themselves have all spotted the trend: among men of about 15 to 30 years old, ever-increasing numbers are checking out of society altogether, giving up on women, sex and relationships and retreating into pornography, sexual fetishes, chemical addictions, video games and, in some cases, boorish lad culture, all of which insulate them from a hostile, debilitating social environment created, some argue, by the modern feminist movement."

Breitbart always plays the victim card. On this end you have these guys in the article and on the other end its epstein, weinstein, clinton and co.

 

[zippy]

Wow, have SA men become such snowflakes or what ?

Seriously SA men, grow a pair. Woosies

 

[jambai]

I've never been quite brave enough for that. Maybe at some point I do want kids, I don't know.

But I think there are significant problems with relations between the sexes. I believe feminism has gone too far, and has actually got out of touch with reality. Men feel increasingly alienated, and that their problems are not being listened. Nobody cares about men's problems - feminists say, men had it so good for thousands of years, a little payback is in order.

Which is a strange notion to have - that men "deserve" a little sexism against them. But more than one feminist has said this. So, its no surprise that this alienates men. Why would a man support a feminist if they feminist is actively working against his own interests? If feminists were purely working for equality, then I can see why a man would support them, but they aren't. They don't want 50%, they want 100%.

Not that men are angels and without blame - we certainly aren't. But it feels like both sides are talking past each other, and not really understanding each other.

I predict fewer and fewer people will get married, and fewer and fewer babies will be born. The Western birth rate will drop dramatically, and in about 10 years it might be seen as the biggest threat to our survival. You might start to see adverts encouraging people to hook up. There will be many more single mothers than there are now.

I personally believe that women are more affected by loneliness than men are, but we will see if that is true in a few years. Already just about every dating site, or dating event you go to has a lot more women than men. If you are a guy that is good at picking up women (I unfortunately am not), you will clean up. It will get super easy. Get a snip and you don't have to worry about babies.

Agree . World is easier to be single as a male than female( think safety , diy , not getting ripped off , etc etc ) All this feminists movements must understand that you can’t take something by not giving up something else . And that something else is that lots of men don’t want these all powerful women that are so independent and hard core and think they can do everything ( not debating the merits ) which throws out the ratios and leads to men not feel like need to commit ( win win ) for them .

 

[Swa]

Ok, so if I understand this correctly, If I had a kid, I will need to pay maintenance for the kid even if we had a prenup?

Even if you were never married. No issue with that itself. People should contribute to the children they create. It should just be on a fairer basis.

How tf does a woman get custody of a child if she can't afford to look after it...

Easy, the man pays for it.

 

[SAguy]

Even if you were never married. No issue with that itself. People should contribute to the children they create. It should just be on a fairer basis.


Easy, the man pays for it.

Yip, my dad had a kid with his second wife. They then got divorced and soon after she quite her job.
Since she doesn't have an income, my dad has to fork out about 80% of their child's costs which is enough to cover for the ex wife's bond, car, etc... No reason for her to work.

If she wants a new car, she just gets one and says that she car is used 75% of the time to drive the kid around - so therefore he should pay his 80% of that 75%. Which means any car she buy, my dad pays 60% of it.

So she bought a bmw, paid her 40% from divorce settlement money - and he pays the rest.
It's like getting a divorce discount on anything she wants to buy - she gets every cent she can, making him pay for his percentage of toothpaste, sunlight liquid, toilet paper, etc that the child uses - car tyres, toilet air freshener, sugar, electricity units, everything... she just takes the slips to court and boom, he has to pay.

He's 2 years from retirement, and the "child" is actually 22 years old - but still no end in sight for him to stop paying because the court order says that he must pay until the child is self sufficient, which is as vague as one can be.

 

[technofool]

Yip, my dad had a kid with his second wife. They then got divorced and soon after she quite her job.
Since she doesn't have an income, my dad has to fork out about 80% of their child's costs which is enough to cover for the ex wife's bond, car, etc... No reason for her to work.

If she wants a new car, she just gets one and says that she car is used 75% of the time to drive the kid around - so therefore he should pay his 80% of that 75%. Which means any car she buy, my dad pays 60% of it.

So she bought a bmw, paid her 40% from divorce settlement money - and he pays the rest.
It's like getting a divorce discount on anything she wants to buy - she gets every cent she can, making him pay for his percentage of toothpaste, sunlight liquid, toilet paper, etc that the child uses - car tyres, toilet air freshener, sugar, electricity units, everything... she just takes the slips to court and boom, he has to pay.

He's 2 years from retirement, and the "child" is actually 22 years old - but still no end in sight for him to stop paying because the court order says that he must pay until the child is self sufficient, which is as vague as one can be.

Yup it's called Divorce Rape and it is big business these days. Even the lawyers love it because it is a real money generator for them.

 

[technofool]

@cyberghost47 said:
Ok, so if I understand this correctly, If I had a kid, I will need to pay maintenance for the kid even if we had a prenup?

Even if you were never married. No issue with that itself. People should contribute to the children they create. It should just be on a fairer basis.
Easy, the man pays for it.

If you were drunk and a fugly one night stand took you home and you said "No, No, Please No" and you got pestered till you gave in and you managed to get a condom on and afterwards you crawled to the loo to flush it where you collapsed in a drunken heap ... BUT she fished it out of the bowl and stole your precious sauce to impregnate herself. The State will do everything in it's power to ensure that you provide for that child to the utmost best of your ability, whether you like it or not.

 

[Jabulani22]

Old rules that are biased from before the days of 1st wave feminism , they seek to protect women while they are already considered a protected group .
See for instance the push on domestic abuse being targeted at men being the abuser while infact lesbian couples have the highest rates of emotional abuse and physical.

 

[Swa]

So two lesbians decide to have a child. One has her dna inserted into a sperm cell used to inseminate the other's egg cell. Who will the court favour?

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

Women beat men at the same rate men beat woman? A link to that source.

I'll raise that one level: Women moer women at the same rate in same sex marriages. Long story ...

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

Old rules that are biased from before the days of 1st wave feminism , they seek to protect women while they are already considered a protected group .
See for instance the push on domestic abuse being targeted at men being the abuser while infact lesbian couples have the highest rates of emotional abuse and physical.

I wonder on the rate of child abuse? Things get extremely warped in these situations.

 

[technofool]

The more I learn about this nonsense the more jaded I get about men's involvement. Feminism began over 200 years ago and some men realized it was a problem but other men passed the laws to enforce this crazy. I feel like finding a male feminist and slapping the silly out of him.
E. Balfort Bax - The Fraud of Feminism https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/51877

 

[Gingerbeardman]

The more I learn about this nonsense the more jaded I get about men's involvement. Feminism began over 200 years ago and some men realized it was a problem but other men passed the laws to enforce this crazy. I feel like finding a male feminist and slapping the silly out of him.
E. Balfort Bax - The Fraud of Feminism https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/51877

See the video I left in post #19.

Also, fix your bloody link, it's a youtube link that redirects to gutenberg.

 

[technofool]

See the video I left in post #19.

Also, fix your bloody link, it's a youtube link that redirects to gutenberg.

Thanks for the link heads up. I love Jordan Petersen, his work on Canadian Bill C16 is directly applicable to our Beach Speech idiocy.
Your video in #19 is strong stuff, I don't think I understood all of it first time round but I have to take a break before I can watch again.