Pegasus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 13,976
I tend to agree. And to add to that, I dont think a top batsman(or bowler) should be captain. It has hardly ever worked, except in Australia's case?
So just a keeper who can't bat then?
I tend to agree. And to add to that, I dont think a top batsman(or bowler) should be captain. It has hardly ever worked, except in Australia's case?
I tend to agree. And to add to that, I dont think a top batsman(or bowler) should be captain. It has hardly ever worked, except in Australia's case?
So just a keeper who can't bat then?
Australia under The Don?
Indians? Pakistanis? Sri Lankans? Even the Windies......
Who ever said they were? Ntini was kept in the team for one to many tests not because of skin colour but because of experience and loyalty.
People wanting to see racists behind every bush and tree are worse than rasists themselves.
Who ever said they were? Ntini was kept in the team for one to many tests not because of skin colour but because of experience and loyalty.
People wanting to see racists behind every bush and tree are worse than rasists themselves.
At the time Polly was dropped, he had a better bowling record over the previous 12 months then Ntini .... Make of it what you will.
Yes, Tendular and Lara are good examples...removed as captains coz they their batting was suffering.
Under what rock have you been hiding? Every second comment made when a person of colour is selected is that the results are gonna go down the tubes....and that it's coz of quotas.
Bookies fancy Kirsten
2010-01-27 17:26
Email | Print
Favourite (File)
Garrin Lambley
Cape Town - Following the shock resignation of Proteas coach Mickey Arthur, leading UK bookmakers, Sky Bet, are offering odds on his replacement.
Former Proteas opener and current Indian coach, Gary Kirsten, has been installed as the 7/4 favourite with another former SA opener, Kepler Wessels, and current Proteas psychologist, Jeremy Snape, next best at 3/1.
Former South African fast bowler Corrie van Zyl, who has been installed as the interim coach to lead the team on their next assignment in India, is 4/1 to take over the role on a permanent basis.
Odds on the next permanent South Africa coach:
Gary Kirsten 7/4
Kepler Wessels 3/1
Jeremy Snape 3/1
Corrie van Zyl 4/1
Duncan Fletcher 5/1
Graham Ford 14/1
At the time Polly was dropped, he had a better bowling record over the previous 12 months then Ntini and a better batting record over the previous 12 months then Prince. Make of it what you will.
The latest news is that everyone was fired because they did not select the mandatory 1 black African. I am not talking about people of colour here. The complaint is that they played Wayne Parnell instead of Lonwabo Tsotsobe. Tell me again that colour has nothing to do with it. Go on, I dare you.
What? People are suggesting, or wanting, Warne or Waugh to coach SA!?! If CSA went this route they would need to realise that they would have the majority of the South African public in uproar and threatening not to support the team. Even with success these two would find it difficult to get support from the public at large.
Yes I agree with Abe's post here, I am still waiting for certain people to reply to it. Yes it was on poor results but also because of not enough Black Africans in the side. The dropping of Ntini ruffled to many feathers
Only marginally so against weaker opposition...but making of it what one wants you could also remember that Pollock was replaced by Morkel knocking on door.
I posted on another thread a while back that SA only had a few 'real' internationals, with the rest (batsmen mostly) with such basic technical flaws that they usually start off ok, but get exposed by good bowlers who prey on that.
All related to footwork really...think Amla's movement and playing accross stumps, Duminy's back foot, Prince, AB (good eye helping him...no footwork) etc
I don't dispute that there is pressure to include black players and sometimes these players are not performing. On the other hand, Ntini hasn't been playing much anyway...and I can only assume it's due to non-performance. But there are MANY players that are giving mediocre and inconsistent performances. The captain is just one of them...if he doesn't give a match winning performance, he doesn't perform...PERIOD. And we all know, the match-winning perfomances have been few and far between.
I would not have any problem with them getting rid of Smith (would prefer it if they did), or anyone else for that matter who doesn't perform. There do, however, seem to be two standards in play. Players of colour not performing get a certain amount of leeway (Amla is an example, he had a string of 11 matches where he averaged around 20 without being dropped) and white players are not (look at McKenzie who was dropped after one average series in Aus).
Where did Smith not perform (to the point that he needs to be dropped) recently?
Between October 2005 and December 2007 he averaged only 30. Thats 20 matches and 38 innings. We lost 8 games and won 9 in that time. I am sure some other players we cut during that run. Of late, his performances seem to be better but I can almost guarantee that if any other player had run of 20 matches and 38 innings where they averaged only 30 as a front line batsmen they would be gone.
....I can almost guarantee that if any other player had run of 20 matches and 38 innings where they averaged only 30 as a front line batsmen they would be gone.
The point is that Polly was made to give way for Morkel instead of Ntini who should rightfully have been dropped at that point.
I think it's called "form". it happens to all players (except the Don).
Kallis carried us through those times.
It's rare that the whole top 6 average over 50 for a whole season, not sure its even happened.