I find this article incredibly disingenuous.
Vodacom charges you 75% of the contract length so to take MBB ridiculous example, where the phone fee is not included.
Vodacom contract is R800 a month (no handset) - To cancel ten months out that is R 800 x 10 @ 75 % = R 6000
MTN in theory lets assume we are talking about a SKY package @ R999 (no handset). is ten months out = R999
That's comparing apples to apples. Of course the cost of the handset has to be recovered, otherwise myself and everyone else would take out a contract for a S23 Ultra, cancel, sell phone, open contract for S23 Ultra.
This whole article seems to be justifying Vodacom's ridiculous 75% of the outstanding contract fee, by specifically not mention any device costs and then going for truly ridiculous device costs to make the figure seem similar in comparison. Please tell me who is taking a R 700 plus device on a R 149 contract, and then the R 149 part of the contract is the part they want to cancel early.
A more realistic comparison would exclude the device costs as OBVIOUSLY you have to pay for the handset you took.
Lets compare the costs on similar deals:
RED VIP 40GB Unlimited R 1 599 pm x 24 cancelling after 14 months = R 11992,50
MTN SKY Silver R 1099 pm x 24 cancelling after 14 months = R 1099 or maybe R 2198 depending on cellphone providers weird calculations of months.
And yes I know the deals aren't that similar as MTN is 10GB more data for R 500 less.
This is just bad journalism.