South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
fair enough - he would have been strongly advised by the state law advisors that the bill was unconstitutional...net effect of signing it woud have been that it would have been challenged in the consititutional court which probably would have found certain sections unconstitutional and sent it back to parliament to be redrafted....this was obvious to most folks outside of the DoC a long long time agoAngelo said:At least the President demonstrated his respect for independent institutes.
The bill set up new rules for the appointment, performance monitoring and dismissal of councillors from the Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa). According to the president, the bill prevented Icasa from being independent, because it gave too much power to the communications minister to hire and fire its members.
The bill had this fault when it was first presented and a carefully crafted compromise was agreed upon between the opposition and government parties.
But after it was passed by the national assembly, the department objected and had the NCOP rewrite the whole bill back the way it was originally.
Three clauses caught the president's eye and had to be changed. Essentially, they allowed the minister to appoint a selection panel to recommend the appointment of councillors. The minister was then allowed to draw up a performance management system to set appropriate indicators and performance targets. The evaluation of the Icasa chairman would be done by a panel appointed by the minister. And finally, the minister would have the power to fire the members of the panel he or she originally appointed.