To start, I'd like to point out that this article intersperses information from the FSCA's most recent statement to provide important context for readers who are following the MTI saga.
Secondly: You mean like all this journalistic investigation that was done in the reporting prior to this one article you decided to pan for some reason?
Anonymous ZA has released explosive details about Mirror Trading International (MTI), including how much money was deposited and withdrawn from the scheme.
mybroadband.co.za
The hacker group Anonymous ZA has released data scraped from MTI’s online systems which reveal the structure of the multi-level marketing scheme.
mybroadband.co.za
Law enforcement officials have raided the offices of Mirror Trading International in Stellenbosch and Polokwane, as well as the home of two of its leadership team members in Durban.
mybroadband.co.za
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority has opened a criminal case against Mirror Trading International, saying that the company and its senior management are conducting an illegal operation, are misleading clients, and have contravened several laws.
mybroadband.co.za
And the possible consequences that can come from running the above articles (including this one that you're criticising)?
Way to twist my words. All I was trying to explain is that there are real consequences for playing it fast and loose with terms like "ponzi", "fraud", or even "pyramid scheme" when you don't have the luxury of anonymity. We can't violate the law or press code by declaring something a ponzi scheme when a court hasn't done so.
In fact, I can't help but question your motives in trying to goad me to say it because this is exactly the kind of trick people involved with MTI have used to try and trap me before.