MultiChoice scraps porn channel

jimmyj said:
i think in the long-term, this is a good decision.
there are enough adult shops and people can
also access porn online.

our country already has a high enough rate of
rape, and porn further objectifies women's
bodies
Click to expand...

LOL

I bet you buy fhm and fap to porn :D.

Have you ever slept with a female? Does doggystle objectify them?
 
jimmyj said:
personally, i think your perspective is rubbish, and honestly do not care if you disagree with me;

porn objectifies women's bodies and does nothing to create respect for women

now think wisely before you post...
Click to expand...
They do it voluntarily in exchange for money, nobody forced them into it.

Once again go read the other threads instead of making people repeat themselves.
 
Smooth Criminal said:
They do it voluntarily in exchange for money, nobody forced them into it.

Once again go read the other threads instead of making people repeat themselves.
Click to expand...

let promote more this?

UK’s lucrative porn trade lures young SA starlets

Weekend Post Correspondents

SOME young South African women are paying for their two-year working holidays in Britain by working in the UK’s porn film industry.

Whereas menial waitressing jobs pay an average of £10 (R111) a day, a day-long shoot for a pornographic film scene generally pays between £250 (R2 750) and £400 (R4 400).

The owner of Beehive Studios in Britain said he hired “many young” South Africans to work in the adult entertainment industry. “You have to be young to be in this business and we get a lot of South Africans to work with us,” said the owner, who did not want to be named.

“We find they are professional and do have a good work ethic. One of our main photographers is a South African.”
Click to expand...

the industry is suffering from HIV as well:

see for yourself: http://www.weekendpost.co.za/main/2006/01/14/news/nl01_14012006.htm

oh lol...new forum rule...read EVERY thread before you post...(pathetic)
 
jimmyj said:
personally, i think your perspective is rubbish, and honestly do not care if you disagree with me;

porn objectifies women's bodies and does nothing to create respect for women

now think wisely before you post...
Click to expand...

Just a quick head's up (I crack me up), there aren't only women in porn. Ever heard of gay porn? Objectifying men's bodies! For shame!

To quote you, think wisely before you post.
 
What is pathetic is equating porn with rape.

Do some research and try not to just read the first and last paragraphs.

The stuff in the middle usually is the most important.
 
daveza said:
What is pathetic is equating porn with rape.

Do some research and try not to just read the first and last paragraphs.

The stuff in the middle usually is the most important.
Click to expand...

oh yea, lets forget the rape simulation porn...
 
Lycanthrope said:
Just a quick head's up (I crack me up), there aren't only women in porn. Ever heard of gay porn? Objectifying men's bodies! For shame!

To quote you, think wisely before you post.
Click to expand...

oh yes, JJ unlike users must cover all the bases in each post...LOL (amplified)
 
daveza said:
What is pathetic is equating porn with rape.

Do some research and try not to just read the first and last paragraphs.

The stuff in the middle usually is the most important.
Click to expand...

just found this from a concerned partner who happens to be female:

A female Canada age 30-35, anonymous writes:

I found out that my husband looks up hardcore porn. His favourite sites are "rape porn" where women are shown to be attacked and brutally treated. I'm completely repulsed by this and feel sick to my stomach that anyone would be excited by this type of thing.

He says he will stop but I found out that he is still going to these sites.

Should I leave him?
Click to expand...

http://www.dearcupid.org/question/his-favourite-sites-are-rape-porn.html

btw, did any1 stand the chance of losing out on $$$ coz DSTV said "no"...?
 
Last edited:
Funny how she doesn't mention whether he rapes her after watching them.

ps: dearcupid.org is the new standard in porn research ?:love::erm:
 
jimmyj said:
oh yes, JJ unlike users must cover all the bases in each post...LOL (amplified)
Click to expand...

No. Most people would have a wider understanding of how laughable the idea is that porn objectifies women's bodies. The same can be said about models who exploit their bodies to earn an income as well. There is no correlation between porn and sexual violence. As Nerfherder said, there is more evidence pointing towards the opposite being true.

By jumping into a thread based on a subject which has been debated for the last two or three weeks and mouthing off absolute ignorance only serves to show a blatant disregard for debate and a necessity to simply say, "This is how I feel, **** you all and your reasons, I'm right and only me."

There is a point in every debate where if one is incapable of seeing the opposition's reasoning, incapable of seeing or understanding that there is a perfect compromise which can be reached and simply agreeing to disagree, then one is doing nothing more than trying to force one's ignorant ideologies (trolling) in a closed-minded and ultimately meaningless manner.

In other words, everyone here has much better things to do with their time than play spoon-feed-the-troll.

daveza said:
Funny how she doesn't mention whether he rapes her after watching them.

ps: dearcupid.org is the new standard in porn research ?:love::erm:
Click to expand...

Agreed. Did she ask herself if he is a violent person? Did she ask herself if he's ever raped her or anyone before? Funny, one might even argue that such simulated porn is what stops someone with that fetish from actually going out and raping someone. *shrug*
 
Last edited:
"This is how I feel, **** you all and your reasons, I'm right and only me."
Click to expand...

honestly, there you are speaking of yourself...and you should seriously think about that

and what a f'd up forum, if just because people discussed things previously, another user

cannot express his views...
 
jimmyj said:
honestly, there you are speaking of yourself...and you should seriously think about that

and what a f'd up forum, if just because people discussed things previously, [-]another user[/-] a known troll

cannot express his views...
Click to expand...

Fixed it for you.
 
Most people would have a wider understanding of how laughable the idea is that porn objectifies women's bodies.
Click to expand...

this is delib off-topic, but "everyone" here is also against the idea of nationalisation;

if you want members who agree with you all the time,

ban me please

i refuse to agree with the lot
 
jimmyj said:
this is delib off-topic, but "everyone" here is also against the idea of nationalisation;

if you want members who agree with you all the time,

ban me please

i refuse to agree with the lot
Click to expand...

For valid reasons which you repeatedly insist in ignoring.
 
Lycanthrope said:
For valid reasons which you repeatedly insist in ignoring.
Click to expand...

no, i don't ignore, i see things through my own eyes,

but really, go ahead and employ apartheid style "bannings"

you cannot handle perspectives other than your own;

so glad i created my own website

enjoy your day every one
 
jimmyj said:
honestly, there you are speaking of yourself...and you should seriously think about that

and what a f'd up forum, if just because people discussed things previously, another user

cannot express his views...
Click to expand...
Actually it does, you can't just keep repeating the same rubbish and not expect a backlash... that is trolling.

GTFO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X