Location: Boksburg
Time: 9PM
Usual disconnect, lag spikes, 2k ms and total frustration in wow, retail and private servers...
frankly im getting sick of this, im on a 512k Uncapped, Unshaped account.
tracert info:
Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms sitecomwl312.sitecomwl312 [192.168.1.1]
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
3 85 ms 68 ms 79 ms 41-133-74-1.dsl.mweb.co.za [41.133.74.1]
4 180 ms 264 ms 284 ms tengig-0-0-0-107.vic-ipc-1.mweb.co.za [196.22.169.158]
5 * * 108 ms vl-92.vic-hscore-2.mweb.co.za [196.22.189.3]
6 312 ms 348 ms 344 ms tengig-0-0-0-0-12.vic-up-2.mweb.co.za [196.22.169.242]
7 430 ms 555 ms 587 ms tengig-0-3-1-0.mid-1.mweb.co.za [196.22.169.211]
8 702 ms 665 ms 515 ms pos-0-0-0-0.lon-1.mweb.co.za [196.22.163.230]
9 708 ms 841 ms 775 ms 149.6.98.17
10 676 ms 1013 ms * te3-4.ccr02.lon02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.36.169]
11 884 ms 1001 ms 751 ms te9-2.mpd02.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.48.153]
12 650 ms 466 ms 804 ms ldn-b4-link.telia.net [213.248.70.237]
13 763 ms 725 ms 755 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.217]
14 683 ms 930 ms 696 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.245.27]
15 765 ms 702 ms 986 ms siemens-ic-119241-ldn-b2.c.telia.net [213.248.104.70]
16 933 ms 813 ms 611 ms 212.58.238.133
17 741 ms 620 ms 478 ms virtual-vip.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]
Trace complete.
ping info to
www.google.com
Pinging
www.l.google.com [209.85.227.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=618ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=667ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=386ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=702ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=598ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=735ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=829ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=930ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=1396ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=1316ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=558ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=472ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=656ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=935ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=918ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=700ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=589ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=657ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.227.147: bytes=32 time=923ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 209.85.227.147:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 19, Lost = 1 (5% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 386ms, Maximum = 1396ms, Average = 767ms
Will@MWEB Please, please please sort this out. IM so sick of MWEB's connection after 7pm!
Edit: Timeouts are regular after 7pm and the results look similar for both @mweb and @dslmweb, although these are from the @mweb set.
Edit2: Its 10PM and this is what shows up to a ping at
www.google.com!?!?!
Pinging
www.l.google.com [209.85.229.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=2901ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1438ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=3501ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1150ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1232ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=876ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1154ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1225ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1499ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=2247ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1067ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=3275ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1137ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1468ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=2691ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=1006ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.85.229.99: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 209.85.229.99:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 16, Lost = 4 (20% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 541ms, Maximum = 3275ms, Average = 1381ms
And again at 10.03PM things seem to be a bit better (still not perfect) only 3 minutes later:
Pinging
www.l.google.com [209.85.146.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=519ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=568ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=544ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=442ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=531ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=531ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=644ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=613ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=621ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=716ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=591ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=682ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=306ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=316ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=551ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=383ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=539ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.85.146.147:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 306ms, Maximum = 716ms, Average = 510ms
And finally at 10:06 these are what we expect to see... another 3 minutes later:
Pinging
www.l.google.com [209.85.146.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=298ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=278ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.85.146.147:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 265ms, Maximum = 321ms, Average = 278ms
Will@MWEB, unfortunately no tracert for the last couple of statistics, but if the problem arises again you can epect em
