MWEB - Message from CEO - Acceptable Use Policy

I read it. Again what is downloaded is irrelevant.

Fact is that they kicked him off because he was a heavy user. If he downloaded home videos it would be the same.

sure and ASASA/ISPA or whom ever reviews will just ignore that fact that he was a pirate; please keep on living in a make believe world.
 
What is downloaded is irrelevant. The point is that they can tighten the rules as they see fit - yesterday it was 800GB, next week it will be 200GB, next month it may be 50GB.

Rubbish. Then they'd lose all their customers. Stop being so overly-dramatic. They want as many happy, contented customers as they can get.
 
If you wish to regularly and consistently encrypt so much traffic that it triggers MWeb into believing that you are contravening their T&C I suggest you take it up with them (as mentioned by the MWeb rep in one of his posts recently). I'm quite sure they will be willing to discuss such usage on a one-on-one basis.

I'm sorry but why should one have to do that?

MWEB should either shape all encrypted traffic OR they should allow use of it as much as non-encrypted traffic.
 
Rubbish. Then they'd lose all their customers. Stop being so overly-dramatic. They want as many happy, contented customers as they can get.

I am sure MWEB would prefer more people who do a max of 10-20GB pm on their uncapped accounts.
 
sure and ASASA/ISPA or whom ever reviews will just ignore that fact that he was a pirate; please keep on living in a make believe world.

ASASA is not a copyright enforcement body. They are an advertising standards body. If they allow that to detract them they are a failure.
 
ASASA is not a copyright enforcement body. They are an advertising standards body. If they allow that to detract them they are a failure.

i will exit here, because you are in one of your silly spinning modes without exist insight and the fact is they will also read this because the isp will submit it especially if the ISPA is consulted again.
 
If you contravene the T&C, they can and will disconnect you. It's really a no-brainer.

I don't believe that the relevant T&Cs are legal or enforceable, which is why I want to see them tested by the relevant legal authorities. That said, the T&Cs are so broad that, taking them at face value, it's likely that nobody hasn't violated them in some way.

If you don't like shaping, take the unshaped account.

You can go dig through the old 'MWEB Q&A' thread pages from back in March (?). The shaped product as described and promoted (read advertised) there is a far cry from the product we have been forced to (and continue to) endure.

So basically, go make use of a spade.
 
i will exit here, because you are in one of your silly spinning modes without exist insight and the fact is they will also read this because the isp will submit it especially if the ISPA is consulted again.

Because you lost the argument. You always lose against me chum.
 
You are a shill.

That's the second time you've called me that in two days? Your word of the day? I was, you will notice, in fact giving you a suggestion regarding keeping your email address with MWeb.
 
That's the second time you've called me that in two days? Your word of the day? I was, you will notice, in fact giving you a suggestion regarding keeping your email address with MWeb.

Please read and comprehend MWeb's Terms and Conditions before becoming hysterical

and the tone of your comments.
 
I'm sorry but why should one have to do that?

MWEB should either shape all encrypted traffic OR they should allow use of it as much as non-encrypted traffic.

And degrade the performance of the network as more and more users pull hundreds of GB monthly at line speed? Then when you can't browse the web or download your email, you'll be the first to complain again.
 
And degrade the performance of the network as more and more users pull hundreds of GB monthly at line speed? Then when you can't browse the web or download your email, you'll be the first to complain again.

LINE SPEED. Isn't this an UNCAPPED OFFERING? Aren't we paying extra for that line speed to TELKOM too?

Advertise it as UNCAPPED OFFERING AT 65KB/sec for only a maxium of 2-3 hours per day.
 
How are they going to prove this?

Whether or not somebody who brings a case before ASASA/ISPA is a pirate would not be relevant I imagine. At least in the cases currently proposed against MWEB.
 
Last edited:
Whether or not somebody who brings a case before ASASA/ISPA is a pirate would not be relevant I imagine. At least in the cases currently proposed against MWEB.

Thats my point - I could be wrong, but I think it would be illegal for MWEB to monitor exactly what you do.
 
Thats my point - I could be wrong, but I think it would be illegal for MWEB to monitor exactly what you do.

Yeah, and they know that people won't be willing to pay them all that dosh knowing that they've taken a stand against 'piracy'.
 
They'll phone you and tell you when you've abused the system... only problem is - its a one time call to say cheers.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X