@SabreWolfy - Agreed, no one knows enough about the untried, untested and uncertain future. The only thing we can say for certain right now is that Seacom is definitely, systematically dysfunctional.
From http://mybroadband.co.za/news/telecoms/13503-EASSy-will-slash-bandwidth-prices.html
'Chris Wood, CEO of WIOC told us: ”We’ve been selling an STM1 IRU for between US$2.3-2.4 million up to London compared with US$3.2-3.3 million from Seacom. Therefore the impact of EASSy will filter through over the coming period.”'
Given the roughly 30% lower pricing that EASSy quotes. EASSy would have to have to be at least 30% less able to provide a service than Seacom's already disastrous standard to reduce their impact to insignificant.
Plus the market is inherently more mature due to Seacom. We now know, for example, that Neotel cannot achieve acceptable service levels. We can hope that with this information available, EASSy will not repeat the same errors.
The assymetical nature of the comparison; rubbish vs unknown, has little value and it's not really the point. Seacom appears to be deeply flawed and it will be beneficial to have a market force compelling them to be more effective. All the indignation comes from the fact that we are paying enough to deserve a quality service.
From http://mybroadband.co.za/news/telecoms/13503-EASSy-will-slash-bandwidth-prices.html
'Chris Wood, CEO of WIOC told us: ”We’ve been selling an STM1 IRU for between US$2.3-2.4 million up to London compared with US$3.2-3.3 million from Seacom. Therefore the impact of EASSy will filter through over the coming period.”'
Given the roughly 30% lower pricing that EASSy quotes. EASSy would have to have to be at least 30% less able to provide a service than Seacom's already disastrous standard to reduce their impact to insignificant.
Plus the market is inherently more mature due to Seacom. We now know, for example, that Neotel cannot achieve acceptable service levels. We can hope that with this information available, EASSy will not repeat the same errors.
The assymetical nature of the comparison; rubbish vs unknown, has little value and it's not really the point. Seacom appears to be deeply flawed and it will be beneficial to have a market force compelling them to be more effective. All the indignation comes from the fact that we are paying enough to deserve a quality service.