- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
- Messages
- 10,689
- Reaction score
- 7
And my question, how do we downgrade to the 1GB R29 account?
Good Day feo, I will escalate this to the relevant team and will be in contact with you.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
And my question, how do we downgrade to the 1GB R29 account?
I don't do anything to bypass the shaping and I get over 100Gb a month. (I don't download series or all the interwebs but do use torrents)
I do a lot of streaming as well? I received the email as well.![]()
Good Day J0n0, unfortunately its not about the type of traffic being moved; its about usage.
Ok, i also got this snotty email from MWEB.... i averaged 375GB/month over 2.5 years - i used my MWEB data usage stats from their own site. I am on a 4MB uncapped Premium package, and ADSL is also hosted by MWEB on my behalf. When i called the technical department on Thursday afternoon i was told to upgrade to the next available package.... which would be a 10MB line.... what is the logic of this?!?? if i download/upload to an average of 375GB/month on 4MB i am going to do the same on a 10MB line.
So i am SERIOUSLY contemplating a move across to another ISP as my average for 2.5 years was 100% acceptable by MWEB... but now when telkom exchange congestion is causing line speeds to drop, mweb is putting the blame on their users and throwing an Eskom titty fit by having me switch my 'geyser' off at night!
Not only did they not complain when i give them R26 950 over 2.5 years, they now want me to only use 13GB/month on an uncapped service! 13GB is based on their own published data:
4 petabytes per month move over their lines(http://www.mweb.co.za/productspricing/2/Home/Benefits/Network.aspx)
Divided by the 320 000 users of MWEB business and MWEB home (http://www.multichoice.co.za/multichoice/view/multichoice/en/page44136)
This works out to 13GB per user.... evidently their capacity is too small and smacks of false advertising.... uncapped my arse.
I am very saddened by this. MWEB.... you do not delight me
Alternatively:
4 Petabytes / 3% of userbase = 436.907GB
if this is the case, again i am not reaching MWEB limits and do not qualify as one of your 3% elitists. mind you, very few will be reaching this ceiling... and by going through all 655 pages of this forum thread, virtually none of the posters are reaching MWEB's top 3% usage stats.... and hereby i announce shenanigans by MWEB!
Hi LordBacon
I'm not going to comment on your calculation as it is your calculation.
With regards to upgrading, you don't need to. What you can do is monitor your usage via My Account and the tips provided in the mailer.
Use your Internet network in a normal way; avoid mass downloading or streaming HD 24/7.
A small percentage of our users consume excessive amounts of data which has a negative impact on MWEB’s network performance.
We are trying to make sure the greater majority of our customer base can start experiencing a better quality of connection.
Going to do this on monday purely on principle.
And so should all. I'm already out as of 1st of august... seems it was a pretty good move in the end
A) convert your account to 1 gig capped account
B) use the cancellation form
Good Morning, clients have become very savvy in the way they obtain line speeds. Bypassing shaping has become all to easy.
Good Day J0n0, unfortunately its not about the type of traffic being moved; its about overall usage.
Use your Internet network in a normal way; avoid mass downloading or streaming HD 24/7.
WHAT ARE THE FREAKING ACCEPTABLE PARAMETERS????????????
ATLEAST GIVE US A DAMN GUIDELINE!!!!!!!
IF I WERE YOU, I WOULD SAY THE FOLLOWING:
1MB - 250GIGS
2MB - 350GIGS
4MB - 550GIGS
10MB - 650GIGS
YES, THE ABOVE "MIGHT" SEEM OFF, BUT ATLEAST ITS SOME SORT OF AN "ACCEPTABLE PARAMETER" THAT WE CAN USE AS GUIDELINES.......................
If they give the thresholds they can't call it uncapped![]()
How times change.
Uncapped ADSL throttling not cool, says MWEB
http://mybroadband.co.za/news/adsl/59563-uncapped-adsl-throttling-not-cool-says-mweb.html
How times change.
Uncapped ADSL throttling not cool, says MWEB
http://mybroadband.co.za/news/adsl/59563-uncapped-adsl-throttling-not-cool-says-mweb.html
Official Press Release:
Rudi Jansen, MWEB CEO, says the time has come for South Africans to experience unlimited internet access that is within their means.
“Internet penetration in South Africa remains below par - in fact, South Africa has fallen behind a number of other African countries in recent times. The lack of well-priced, generously-provisioned bandwidth has been holding us all back, and as a result we are missing out on an immense economic opportunity.
Hi DJ
The statement that we don't care about losing our customers really couldn't be further from the truth.
We have made a promise to our customers to deliver a premium uncapped service which is superior in performance and hosted on a world class network.
That network is a valuable business asset and like any business we have the right to protect our assets and take steps to ensure that we can deliver on our promises to the vast majority of our paying customers.
If this means that we have to put rules and measures in place to curtail the actions of a very small portion of users who refuse to act in a reasonable fashion then this is what we will do, as much as it may sadden us to have to do so.
We understand that these steps will anger the portion of users who thrive on pushing the service to its tolerance limits and we also understand that many of the users we find on this particular forum fall into that category.
Believe me I fully anticipated that this news would not be well received by this community and I wish that I didn't have to be the one to share it, but I do firmly believe that what we have done will have a positive impact on the performance of MWEB's network, which is too everyone's benefit.
If the users directly affected by this change could bring themselves to see it through into next month and bring down their data usage a little bit to see what it takes to avoid the limits they might actually find that this is a better situation for everyone in the long run.
As to the point which has been made a few times now as to why the users in question did not receive warnings prior to this. it is quite simply because the previous discretionary method of manually issuing warnings and following them up with 2nd and 3rd warnings was inefficient and very time consuming.
This meant that it only allowed us to deal with a very small sampling of abusers at a time and we also did not like the poor customer experience it created of ultimately having to ask users who refused to comply to change products or terminate the service.
In the long run the simple and effect method of enforcing a temporary speed reduction on users who push the product beyond reasonable limits is actually a much better customer experience and we hope it will help us to keep more of these users on board once they begin to manage their own behavior.