http://www.ellipsis.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/licence_exemption_regulations_2008.pdf
Gazette notice:
"Small electronic communications network" means an ECN that lies within a
limited spatial area, used by a specific user group, has a specific topology and is not an ECNS of national, provincial, district or local municipal scope, but may be connected to one which is licensed or licence exempt. For example Local Area Network (LAN) or wireless LAN (WLAN).
The gazette notice references the following passages in the ECA:
6.2(c)
Private electronic communications networks (PECN) used principally for or integrally
related to the internal operations of the network owner. Except that where the
private electronic communications networks' additional capacity is resold, the
Authority may prescribe terms and conditions for such resale;
(d) small electronic communications networks such as local area networks;
(e) uses of the radio frequency spectrum that were permitted without a licence
92.(2) Any person who, immediately before the commencement of this Act, lawfully provided any service or used the radio frequency spectrum in terms of the Telecommunications Act, the Broadcasting Act or the IBA Act without a licence, is
considered to have a licence exemption in terms of section 6 to continue to provide such service or use the radio frequency spectrum, unless notified in writing by the Authority that such service or the use of the radio frequency spectrum requires
a licence in terms of this Act.
...Of Municipal scope ...
The latest gazette notice read in context of the ECA 6.2(c) and 92.(2) with the term "...municipal scope.." basically says that fiber and copper
can't cross the road, since this crosses a municipal boundary. Icasa has for the first time
interpreted the ECA as they see it.
The issue is
intent , what was the intent of the ECA ? Certainly not to give the public the right to run their own fiber cable from PTA to JHB. And in
any court ruling a judge will take the intent of the ECA into consideration. IF your intent is to setup a Wi-fi system and resell data to everybody in a radius of 10km, Icasa would have a case against you. But if you cross the road with a radio signal only a small distance to link your two houses then you intent is clear: Not to provide a commercial service.
Lets presume SAB has buildings on both sides of the road and wish to setup a PECN between these two networks by running a fiber under the road. Their
intent isn't to resell Neotel data and thus it would be legal for them to cross the road but not to run a fiber between their JHB and PTA offices for this would absorb to large extent the whole point of having a Neotel. Jawug would seem to be borderline situation because the networks crosses extended municipal boundaries and people are using it to provide commercial services "undercover". How would one any case prevent resale of data?
This is in stark contrast to Act.96 which outright forbid all data crossing a boundary.
Fiber for CCTV seems legal
A community setting up a non-profit company to stream CCTV via fiber over roads seems legal. The term " small network" is ambiguous - how small is small ?
If your
intent with a "small" regional network covering 10 roads is not to become the next Neotel but to CCTV the street then I can't see Icasa having a problem with it. If the result of your network doesn't impact the revenues Neotel would have made, Icasa will probably not send you a notice.
All of this of academic importance
None of this nonsense would ever get past the NPA, it is largely of academic importance. The only issue would be if Icasa sends you a notice that say your WUG tower is reselling data and that they will confiscate your gear if you don't desist. Thus what damages in terms of physical confiscation can Icasa inflict, this is all we should concern ourselves with.
Private Estates - Icasa has just asserted its jurisdiction over you as I predicted
ON this site
http://tinyurl.com/6kcq2x I predicted that Icasa will eventually make some sort of ruling about private estates running fiber under their roads. This gazette notice by Icasa was the notice, read it carefully and see that Icasa now has control over every electron inside a boundary using any network topology for any purpose using any device or apparatus licensed or not.
Read especially the part on th ITWEB article where ISPA jumped the gun and told us what Icasa was planning to do, they have now done so.