Fulcrum29
Honorary Master
Nah this is for Intel to wrestle with, AMD can power through on raw power... it makes much more sense to not put AI on the CPU or GPU anyway, rather put it on a dedicated separate PCIe device that is GPU agnostic.
AMD's raw power is running a bit hot ain't it? Having separate devices would mean that tooling is expanded, again, too many SKUs. The dedicated workstation/AI GPUs are the Instinct series. Same cloth as the consumer GPUs.
The point is, people don't only use their GPUs to game anymore; many apps are GPU accelerated.
Well I generally consider 4080+ to be high end and 4090 to be gratuitous.... most people don't need anything more than 4070 for 1440p and 4k is in many ways still a luxury pipe dream. Hell the 7900GRE is more than enough for most people and cheaper than the 4070+ unless the prices have shifted again.... if nothing else I myself am considering not buying nvidia again out of sheer spite for their extortionary practices so I am biased.
Next year will be the real test probably as these products mature to market.
Ja boet I saw the 20 series and wondered wtf
I like the 7900 GRE, but the RTX 4070 Super is not that much more. Comparing XFX to Palit. For CUDA alone I would pay that ~R 1000 premium. These same arguments are made all the time, go take a look at Reddit, yet, it is Nvidia who own the lion's share.
Maybe AMD will get it right with RDNA 5. RDNA 4 being a bug remedy to RDNA 3 will not cut it on the productivity end. Perhaps it is not a hardware issue at all...