Debbie
Banned
bwana v.11 said:So are you going to register them or chuck em?
Neither!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
bwana v.11 said:So are you going to register them or chuck em?
I see -so you dont believe that the operator will comply and disconnect any unregistered accounts?Debbie2 said:Neither!
bwana v.11 said:I see -so you dont believe that the operator will comply and disconnect any unregistered accounts?
Yeah, sure it is. FU2 mate.Asked whether the level of bureaucracy justify the outcome in the criminal justice system, Manyatshe said: “It will bring in more administrative work, but it is important to know who has a cellphone, it is.”
The citizens are appealling for the act to be abolished. But do we actually have a same in this fcked up country. I think not. Screw the dept of justice, we WILL use false names.MTN is appealing that the deadline for the implementation be shifted. The act is still going through a series of amendments, according to MTN’s general manager for legal and regulatory affairs, Graham de Vries.
Exactly the reason I will not comply, but what are "the people" going to do about it. Probably just sit back and wait for the tsunami to hit.kilo39 said:I have zero trust of these "regulations" - so open to abuse by gub or anybody who has access. Will we ever have another "free" election - I doubt it? Call it was it is: a return to the Police State.
![]()
You mean like actually enforce any of them. We'll have free broadband before any of that ever happens.kilo39 said:Great post and good points! I'm sure I read this whole thing (number registration, cell monitoring) was instigated by SARS? This is about random spying and knowing who made the calls. But it is so open to abuse by government - want to know the dissenting voices - look it up! Want to know who slept with whom? Look it up! Etc. We just don't need all this legislation - why not DO something with the 10 0001 laws that have already been written?
/edit/to me this is not about criminals - it is about ultimate political control.
Like that has made any difference. Want to remain anonymous then just transfer your funds in R4999.95 chunks. Want to be untraceable then just print out a fake "proof of residence" on preferably a stolen printer.bwana v.11 said:The Financial Intelligence Centre Act was an attempt to keep in line with international trends wrt money laundering etc.
ANCkilo39 said:Aspersie - Save your money. Buy a pigeon! Ultimately there will be no unregistered phones - they'll all be shut down. Writing these words - realise this has to be a fiasco - what genius dreamed this up anyway?
That's exactly the problem it won't.schitz011 said:Pardon me if this has been asked before, but how exactly will having all cel phones registered help bring down crime?
The new law also gives them the "right" to do so.schitz011 said:I agree with all the comments about being a police state. This present gvmt is getting even more power hungry and it wouldn't surprise me if you started getting knocks on your door at 3 in the morning and a goon squad dragged you out of bed for making calls to 'suspicious' telephone numbers... If they want to know who owns the phone, whats to stop them listening in on conversations?
schitz011 said:Pardon me if this has been asked before, but how exactly will having all cel phones registered help bring down crime?
I agree with all the comments about being a police state. This present gvmt is getting even more power hungry and it wouldn't surprise me if you started getting knocks on your door at 3 in the morning and a goon squad dragged you out of bed for making calls to 'suspicious' telephone numbers... If they want to know who owns the phone, whats to stop them listening in on conversations?
I hope everyone waits untill June 30 2007 before making any attempt to do so. Then they will have an easy 2,920,000 to register per hour. Then I hope they can work just as fast as the DoC and ICASA. I can't wait for that fiasco or they will have to disconnect 88% of their revenue. Does anyone really think they will do that?With 8m-odd prepaid subscribers in the country, MTN South Africa managing director Maanda Manyatshe calculates that the company would have to verify 8 000 subscribers per hour (eight hours a day, five days a week), in order to meet the requirement that all subscribers are captured in a database within a year of July 1 2006.
wouldn't it be great if the cell phone operators would stand up to this act, on the basis that it is unconstitutional (even if they just did it for the sake of their own bottom line)? i mean, what's next... retina scanning and thumbprint id's at every public telephone booth?...The act is still going through a series of amendments...
Yeah - you do have to supply ID when you sign a contract - but that could be a cellphone company policy rather than a legal one.jarr said:and, just out of interest sake, do you currently have to present your id book when sighning up for a contract as well? if not, will contract users also have to go 'register' themselves?
Highflyer_GP said:Yup you need to provide identification when signing up for a contract...
darn, there goes that ideabwana v.11 said:Yeah - you do have to supply ID when you sign a contract...
well, i'm no lawyer, but it just sounds like it should be unconstitutional!bwana v.11 said:I'm sure if it's unconstitutional the courts can strike it down right?
Well, actually it's completely unconstitutional, but then so are a lot of other laws that has been in effect for decades. And as I said don't forget who will from now on decide what is constitutional and what is not; the parliament, aka ANC.jarr said:darn, there goes that ideawell, i'm no lawyer, but it just sounds like it should be unconstitutional!
especially if you have the odd paranoid tendency...![]()