Numetro FAIL for sexism

You then compound that by implying that my concern is less valid if I don't personally campaign against every single other social injustice at the same time.
No. My point in saying that was that as adults we need to discern real issues from nonsense issues. We don't take comedians to task for being racist even though they might make comments that might seem racist to someone prone to pc kneejerk reactions, just like we don't take Nestle to task for a silly chocolate slogan. Just because something looks sexists, doesn't mean it is sexist.
 
Last edited:
I know exactly what the marketing manager was thinking. It doesn't make it right. Do you agree with me that a 'men's night out' movie will NEVER happen, and especially not with a callous poster saying 'No women allowed'?

Discrimination isn't a 'sometimes ok, sometimes not' thing ... either racial or gender inequality are ALWAYS wrong, or they're ALWAYS right. So which is it, Saor?

Let's put it this way. A real man wouldn't give a crap. Put your big boy panties on.
 
Let's put it this way. A real man wouldn't give a crap. Put your big boy panties on.

Chevron, do you only come online to reaffirm your belief that you're awesome?

You and your big boy panties need to learn that if somebody spots something you don't personally disagree with, they're still entitled to their opinion.
 
No condescension meant. Just saying you're chasing windmills. There's no sexism in the objectionable sense. Unless you're also of the opinion that single-sex toilets should be abolished because they're discriminatory. In which case you're a narrow and intolerant bigot to boot. (But that's just my opinion.)

"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemyy."

-- Henry Kissinge
 
Last edited:
No condescension meant. Just saying you're chasing windmills. There's no sexism in the objectionable sense. Unless you're also of the opinion that single-sex toilets should be abolished because they're discriminatory. In which case you're a narrow and intolerant bigot to boot. (But that's just my opinion.)

"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemyy."

-- Henry Kissinge

Well, funny thing. Did you know there's actually a big debate on about gendered public toilets and how they cater for alternative sexualities?

It's not a debate I'm involved in, but it's definitely thought-provoking.

My personal feeling on toilets is that it's discriminatory that women get private cubicles while men are lined up like cattle to piss into urinals, but hey. Better get my big boy panties on, because discrimination is apparently cute and noble.

Your quote, Arthur, like your views on this subject, is misplaced. This is not about the battle of the sexes, but rather the battle for freedom from discrination.

The last time I checked, that was one principle everybody agreed is great in South Africa's constitution.

Maybe the guys here would have different views if the sign read 'Blacks!!! Blacks!!! Blacks!!! No whites allowed!'

Who'd have thought it's this difficult for people to recognise discrimination, even when it's aimed against them.
 
Why not test it? Go there, try buy a ticket and see if they deny you a ticket. I'm sure they won't.
 
Maybe the guys here would have different views if the sign read 'Blacks!!! Blacks!!! Blacks!!! No whites allowed!'

Like 90% of job adverts that's totally acceptable now (the other way around would of course be the start of World War 3).

A bit of a fail when it comes to their marketing. It would have been sufficient to just advertise as "ladies night".

On a personal note, as a straight guy I'm really looking forward to Pitch Perfect 2 coming out. The first one was awesome.
 
Funny how some men only see sexism when it's directed at men

Um, actually no. My whole point in my previous post is that apparently many of the guys here can't even recognise discrimination when it is aimed directly at them.

And rorz0r, dressing discrimination up in prettier language never makes it better.
 
Um, actually no. My whole point in my previous post is that apparently many of the guys here can't even recognise discrimination when it is aimed directly at them.

And rorz0r, dressing discrimination up in prettier language never makes it better.

Or maybe they can see the difference between a ladies night at the movies and actual sexism.
 
Or maybe they can see the difference between a ladies night at the movies and actual sexism.

What is your definition of sexual discrimination, Sherbang?

Mine is simply unequal treatment of individuals based on their sex and/or gender.

Last time I checked, our Constitution guarantees us freedom from discrimination on any grounds, and there are no quaint waivers to that (like 'ladies' movie nights are fine to promote business).

The simple marketing assumption that Numetro has made is that by being discriminatory they will in fact attract MORE viewers than they would have otherwise, and what is that based on? The premise that a lot of women would rather go watch a "girly" movie without guys around.

There are at least two problems in that premise - can you seriously not spot them?
 
Highveld recently(ish) had a "guys night" at the movies to see Taken 3. NO WIMMINS ALLOWED!
 
Highveld recently(ish) had a "guys night" at the movies to see Taken 3. NO WIMMINS ALLOWED!

Good, and I hope people complained about that too. Any guy who deliberately wants to hang out in a cinema full of other guys needs HIS man card revoked ... or at least traded in for one of those pretty rainbow-coloured variants.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X