Obama's Mandela Address Fee

Freshy-ZN

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
5,729
Reaction score
92
Location
Underberg, KZN
I cannot seem to find any info on what he was paid. Perhaps he only asked for basic costs to be covered because he has so much money it surprises even him....

[video]https://twitter.com/i/status/1019247174901731335[/video]
 
Clinton charged for speaking engagements, so I wouldn't be surprised if Obama charged. Considering Trump offered him security....
 
Obama.jpg


I cannot seem to find any info on what he was paid. Perhaps he only asked for basic costs to be covered because he has so much money it surprises even him....

I'm sure he is surprised....

At the White House Correspondents' Dinner a year ago, President Barack Obama teased Hillary Clinton over her six-figure speeches to Wall Street banks. "If this material goes well, I'll use it at Goldman Sachs next year," he said. "Earn me some serious Tubmans."

Less than 100 days after leaving office, Mr Obama has followed through: accepting a $400,000 speaking fee from Cantor Fitzgerald, the mid-sized investment bank.

On Tuesday a person familiar with the arrangement confirmed that Mr Obama had agreed to appear as the keynote speaker at Cantor's annual healthcare conference in September. The person declined to comment on what the former president might do with his fee, which is nearly twice the $225,000 price commanded by Mrs Clinton during three speeches to Goldman in 2013.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/26/obama-to-be-paid-400000-for-cantor-fitzgerald-speech.html
 
It's obama, nothing more than whispers no matter what he earned to speak ...... imagine the noise if it was trump though :crylaugh:
 
Lol. Consrvatards think the only politicians/ex-politicians to get speaking fees are Obama and Clinton :crylaugh:

From 2012:

1. Donald Trump, $1-1.5 million:

In 2006 and 2007, The Learning Annex shelled out a hefty fee to have Donald Trump at their Real Estate Wealth Expos, paying him a whopping $1.5 million per speech for a 17-seminar conference. Trump only had to speak for an hour at each one, but audience members say he gave them their money’s worth by staying to answer audience questions. This was after Trump had already raked in one million per speech speaking at the same seminars in 2005. The company felt Trump was well worth the money, however, as few others have the celebrity and business savvy he does.

2. Ronald Reagan, $1 million:

Back in 1989, the Fujisankei Communications Group in Japan paid this former president a cool million per speech to come to the country and tour. Reagan gave two speeches while there as well as speaking at media outlets and giving interviews. Still, Reagan didn’t make out too shabby with $2 million (in 1989 dollars) under his belt for sharing his business and presidential experience with the company desperately in need of public relations help. The Reagans created a national sensation in Japan, boosting the company’s profile.

3. Tony Blair, $616,000:

On a lecture by lecture basis, Blair is likely the world’s best paid speaker. In 2009, he made almost $616,000 for two half-hour speeches given in the Philippines, raking in over $10,000 a minute. Listeners didn’t get to hear what he had to say for free, however, and many tickets to the event topped $500. Even in a time of economic crisis when many have slashed their fees, Blair’s have remained buoyant, due perhaps to his lengthy stint as Prime Minister and the insight and analysis he can offer as a result of it.

4. Bill Clinton, $150,000- $450,000:

It isn’t unusual for this former president to net $150,000 and up for a speech. Clinton has spoken at a wide range of events around the world from environmental conferences to business meetings, often promoting causes like HIV/AIDS treatment, economic empowerment and leadership development. The same charisma and likeability that won him two elections likely contribute to organizations’ willingness to shell out the big bucks to have him speak. Clinton has scaled back his speaking schedule, however, to support his wife as Secretary of State.

5. Rudy Guilani, $270,000:

While millions of New Yorkers got to hear Guiliani speak for free during his time as mayor, his speaking fees aren’t cheap now that he’s retired. Since his time in office, he’s earned nearly $10 million in speaking fees, with his most expensive gig netting him $217,000. This speech was given at Sage Capital, a St. Louis-based private equity firm, and chances are his presidential candidacy may have helped out the bottom line on his fees as well.

6. Alan Greenspan, $250,000:

Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan has been able to bring in the bucks since retiring through giving speeches. Only a week after his retirement, Greenspan spoke at a Lehman Brothers dinner, earning himself $250,000. Worth noting is that his successor to the position, Ben Bernacke, won’t even make that in his first year on the job, earning just $191,000.

7. Lance Armstrong, $100,000 and up:

Straight facts are hard to get on just what Armstrong is paid to appear as a keynote speaker. With inspirational fodder gained both from his successful battle against cancer and his comeback win of the Tour de France, Armstrong is in demand as a speaker regardless of the kind of fees he commands. While he might only need $100,000 to appear at some events, industry insiders have noted that he asked for $750,000 for a series of speeches given overseas just last year, a fee that might not be out of line for celebrity speakers.

8. Al Gore, $100,000-150,000:

Since his time as Vice President and his famous run for president, Al Gore has made a name for himself as a strong opponent of global warming and an environmental activist. Gore has maintained his draw as a speaker because of this activism, and now routinely charges in the $100,000 range for speeches. Having an Oscar-winning film and a Nobel Peace Prize under his belt sure can’t hurt either. While some have criticized his high fees, his camp maintains that he donates a percentage of his fees to the Alliance for Climate Protection.

9. Richard Branson, $100,000 and up:

This business mogul is known world wide for his record company and airlines, not to mention his forward-thinking business plans. It is, perhaps, a combination of these things–his business savvy, willingness to take risks, and ultimate success–that make him such a desirable speaker. Of course, if you want to bring him to your event, expect to pay at least $100,000, though many other companies have been rumored to have paid more.

10. Sarah Palin, $100,000 and up:

A few years ago, few people outside of Alaska had any idea who Sarah Palin was. Now, a presidential race and loads of media attention later, Palin is a household name, and she is capitalizing on it big time. Who can blame her, however, when she can command $100,000 and more for a speech? Since leaving office as governor, Palin has brought in nearly $12 million in book royalties, speaking fees and soon, a reality TV show.
 
Lol. Consrvatards think the only politicians/ex-politicians to get speaking fees are Obama and Clinton :crylaugh:

[/URL]:

Nothing to do with the right to charge a fee. I just find it a bit hypocritical to charge that sort of money (which the Nelson Mandela Foundation must have paid for) to preach about opulence and big houses.

But that's why I was interested in what fee he got in in context with the segment of his speech in the link I posted,

Libtards…..
 
Nothing to do with the right to charge a fee. I just find it a bit hypocritical to charge that sort of money (which the Nelson Mandela Foundation must have paid for) to preach about opulence and big houses.

But that's why I was interested in what fee he got in in context with the segment of his speech in the link I posted,

Libtards…..


So you don't even know if he did charge a fee.

Lol.
 
Nothing to do with the right to charge a fee. I just find it a bit hypocritical to charge that sort of money (which the Nelson Mandela Foundation must have paid for) to preach about opulence and big houses.

But that's why I was interested in what fee he got in in context with the segment of his speech in the link I posted,

Libtards…..

I didn't listen to his address, and to spare those of us that have no interest in his address, could you post an excerpt where he "preached about opulence and big houses".

Edit: Here's a link to the transcript, which I glanced over and couldn't find anything about opulence and big houses.
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/art...ch-at-the-2018-nelson-mandela-annual-lecture/
 
Last edited:
I didn't listen to his address, and to spare those of us that have no interest in his address, could you post an excerpt where he "preached about opulence and big houses".

Edit: Here's a link to the transcript, which I glanced over and couldn't find anything about opulence and big houses.
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/art...ch-at-the-2018-nelson-mandela-annual-lecture/

The video I linked to wasn't the whole speech but contained this excerpt :

"I should add, by the way, right now I’m actually surprised by how much money I got, and let me tell you something: I don’t have half as much as most of these folks or a tenth or a hundredth. There’s only so much you can eat. There’s only so big a house you can have. (Cheers and applause.) There’s only so many nice trips you can take. I mean, it’s enough. (Laughter.) You don’t have to take a vow of poverty just to say, “Well, let me help out and let a few of the other folks – let me look at that child out there who doesn’t have enough to eat or needs some school fees, let me help him out. I’ll pay a little more in taxes. It’s okay. I can afford it.” (Cheers and applause.) I mean, it shows a poverty of ambition to just want to take more and more and more, instead of saying, “Wow, I’ve got so much. Who can I help? How can I give more and more and more?” (Cheers and applause.) That’s ambition. That’s impact. That’s influence. What an amazing gift to be able to help people, not just yourself. (Applause.) Where was I? I ad-libbed. (Laughter.) You get the point. "
 
The video I linked to wasn't the whole speech but contained this excerpt :

"I should add, by the way, right now I’m actually surprised by how much money I got, and let me tell you something: I don’t have half as much as most of these folks or a tenth or a hundredth. There’s only so much you can eat. There’s only so big a house you can have. (Cheers and applause.) There’s only so many nice trips you can take. I mean, it’s enough. (Laughter.) You don’t have to take a vow of poverty just to say, “Well, let me help out and let a few of the other folks – let me look at that child out there who doesn’t have enough to eat or needs some school fees, let me help him out. I’ll pay a little more in taxes. It’s okay. I can afford it.” (Cheers and applause.) I mean, it shows a poverty of ambition to just want to take more and more and more, instead of saying, “Wow, I’ve got so much. Who can I help? How can I give more and more and more?” (Cheers and applause.) That’s ambition. That’s impact. That’s influence. What an amazing gift to be able to help people, not just yourself. (Applause.) Where was I? I ad-libbed. (Laughter.) You get the point. "

That doesn't come across as a braggat, or lacking empathy, insensitive, which your comment "preached about opulence and big houses" suggests.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X