Obama's Promises & the coming 'Attack'

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Follow Obama's actions vs. his promises here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

Yeah sure hmm I wonder what a left wing site would say :rolleyes:

*sigh*

People really need to be chicken fed. The same people who made the promises are now going to tell you whether they kept them or not.

So I ask you has Obama lived up to his promise of removing the old Washington elite by hiring the likes of Joe Bidden, Hilary Clinton and co to high office?
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874

remybfg10k

Expert Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
3,798
Funny that CNN haven't made it official yet, euronews can tell the future it seems :rolleyes:
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
So I ask you has Obama lived up to his promise of removing the old Washington elite by hiring the likes of Joe Bidden, Hilary Clinton and co to high office?

Anybody? No Obamatologists willing to answer this simple question. No surprise there then :eek:
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,681
Here's some change for the doubters -

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/22/guantanamo.order/index.html

President Barack Obama issued four executive orders Thursday to demonstrate a clean break from the Bush administration on the war on terror, including one requiring that the U.S. military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay be closed within a year.

A second executive order formally bans torture by requiring that the Army field manual be used as the guide for terror interrogations. The order essentially ends the Bush administration's CIA program of enhanced interrogation methods.

A third executive order establishes an interagency task force to lead a systematic review of detention policies and procedures and a review of all individual cases.

A fourth executive order delays the trial of Ali al-Marri, a legal U.S. resident who has been contesting his detention for more than five years as an enemy combatant in a military brig without the government bringing any charges against him.
 

Sackboy

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
5,598
He had to take the oath again because he missed out some words. lol
I hope he's not so careless when it comes pressing the nuclear button. Ooops, there goes North Korea!
 

TMoose

Expert Member
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
2,149
Wow that attack on the 22nd was awesome. LG seriously, give it up, you're wrong so often it's funny.
 

Hosehead

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
7,838
Anybody? No Obamatologists willing to answer this simple question. No surprise there then :eek:


My Obamameter is throbbing. I'm having multiple Obamagansims so I'll get around to that question when they stop.
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
So I ask you has Obama lived up to his promise of removing the old Washington elite by hiring the likes of Joe Bidden, Hilary Clinton and co to high office?

Anybody? No Obamatologists willing to answer this simple question. No surprise there then :eek:
WTF is a Obamatologist?
And when did he promise to 'remove the old Washington elite' exactly?
(Not that I'm saying he didn't promise that)
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
Hey guys just read an article overseas that Gitmo is to be closed down. Anyone else hear of this? Wonder how long before the USA is attacked yet again.
 
Last edited:

Ghazi

Banned
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
152
Don't fall for the Islamist letter, Barack Obama

I think Obama is just doing the opposite of what Bush did to make everybody happy. But soon enough he is going to realise the realities of dealing with terrorists.
I think it'll be sooner than most think.

Don't fall for the Islamist letter, Barack Obama

Over the years the open letter has become a very popular tool for the Islamists, and one which they utilised yet again yesterday in a crass attempt at influencing the Obama administration to base its foreign policy on how appease Islamists and thus prevent them from killing people all over the world.

According to the letter, it has been signed by “scientists, thinkers, intellectuals, political activists, jurists, and academics from the Islamic nation.” These include one of the leading members of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf al-Qaradawi and head of the Jamaat-e-Islami, Qadhi Hussein Ahmad.

This letter is the latest manifestation of the now well-established method of appealing to those who insist that the United States has only itself to blame for the rise in international terrorism. Just as bin Laden and Zawahiri have made public statement that, if troops left Iraq and Afghanistan, then al-Qaeda would call it quits, this letter suggests that if Obama were to pull the troops out, there would be no more "resistance".

It reads: “The resistance in some Muslim countries is a result of the aggression, injustice and tyranny practised or sponsored by the United States, and such resistance is not the cause of violence and terrorism as some circles in America like to claim. Therefore, if such resistance troubles you and you wish peace to spread over, you have to end occupation and return to the peoples their rights and sovereignty."

This is of course contrary to the words and actions of this "resistance", who are not motivated only by the US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also, to name but a few, by their obsession with creating an Islamic state, their hatred of the democratic institutions that are now in place in both of these nations, and their disgust at the gall that their women are showing by getting an education.

The letter tries to justify the reasons for Islamist terrorism as simply a reaction to recent US imperialism in the Middle East, which does not explain why the September 11 attacks occurred before any US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. But wait, they have found an ingenious way of getting around this tricky subject:

“… the events of the 11th of September 2001 were nothing but fabricated drama by some influential forces in America in co-ordination with Israeli Mossad. They have done all that in order to find a reason to trigger the Third World war that they have already planned for and decided its goals and targeted fields.”

There are a number of references to the suffering of the Palestinian people, not in itself an unreasonable complaint, although they do border on the hyperbolic:

“We deeply realise that every sane person believes deep inside that no other nation in history has suffered injustice like the one inflicted upon the Palestinian people.”

If we were to consider this as a genuine effort at highlighting to the President the plight of Muslims around the world, rather than an attempt to further worldwide Islamist causes, then of course one would expect to see some mention of the hundreds of thousands of Muslim Darfuris being slaughtered at the hands of the al-Bashir regime.

Why, one might ask, has such a massacre been omitted from this litany of atrocities being committed against Muslims? A quick glance at some more of the cosignatories explains it all. They include the former Minister for Religious affairs in Hassan al-Turabi’s National Islamic Front party (NIF), Esam Ahmed Al-Bashir, and one of the founding members of the current Sudanese regime, Abdul Rahman Siwar al-Dhahb.

Although it is unlikely that any of Obama’s people will even see this letter, it is absolutely crucial that they do not fall for this sort of intimidation, especially when it comes from some of the leading members of the most powerful and influential Islamist groups in the world.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/4325049/Dont-fall-for-the-Islamist-letter-Barack-Obama.html
 
Top