Official Super Rugby 2016 Thread

Mephisto_Helix

Resident Postwhore
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
29,722
Breezers struggled in the easiest pool ever ....... then came the Chiefs :D NZ rugby really is pretty on point atm, how SA will catch up I don't even
 

Mephisto_Helix

Resident Postwhore
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
29,722
At least the Stormers are scoring tries against the Kiwis.

and the Sharks played NZ teams this year and scored tries, moot point ..... Breezers are the supposed saviors of SA rugby, even over the Lions if you go by WeePee fansites, so surely they should be blowing the Chiefs away :rolleyes:
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,031
The Stormers had no game plan entering this match. Damn, should had gone with John Mitchell... At least my team had won.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,031
That's what you get when you wait until the quarters to play a NZ side

I doubt that the result would had been better… #15 and #10… Thomson was more composed than du Preez, Kolbe would had been more suited than Taute. Jean-Luc and Coleman would had been the better rotation. Jones and de Allende played well. Du Toit, he was not in the game. Elstadt would had served better as a 60 minute replacement than a 15 minute replacement, losing Kolisi was a hurdle. Not to mention that the Stormer wingers are weak tacklers.
 
Top