Lol, the bulls were not dirty. De Wet getting sent off after a Stormers player ran into him... That is the stigma surrounding the bulls. But it will be funny to see if bakkies is found guilty or not as it is the same charge as he got in the BI Lions series....
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: How frequently are you watching FIFA World Cup 2026 matches?
Official Super14 2010 Thread
Lol, the bulls were not dirty. De Wet getting sent off after a Stormers player ran into him... That is the stigma surrounding the bulls. But it will be funny to see if bakkies is found guilty or not as it is the same charge as he got in the BI Lions series....
Ou grote
Honorary Master
Well yes it is always the "fairies" that are seen as the good guys
Sure there are no eye gougers in the Stormers team
Ou grote
Honorary Master
Well yes it is always the "fairies" that are seen as the good guys
Sure there are no eye gougers in the Stormers team
Nope, WeePee is clean.
Springbokke is another story, we even supported Naas when he played for the bokke.
(if he passed a few times per game)
ROFL
Ja ja I must say the stormers got there first yellow this weekend past 
That is a very very good record to have.
How much was it?
R150 - Grand Stand on the ramp, just next to the tunnel.
I have a feeling the tickets for the bulls game is more expensive.... but this being Gauteng and people earning more it is fair :/
Not sure on their prices.
These tickets i normally buy for R80. It went up by R30.
Last season they were R50.
GreGorGy
BULLSFAN
Bakkies got 4 weeks
Justice 4 again!
Justice 4 again!
Ou grote
Honorary Master
U buy at the ground?
Computicket never have tickets that are that good.
Hope our players don't strike again.
Computicket gets given a portion of the tickets to sell.
For the best seats you need to get them at Newlands.
Well normal games are around R130 for the good seats at loftus and I am sure last year for the semis it was about R200 for a not-so-good seat
4 weeks?! WTF? Ok i think we should all pack up and start playing touchies .... fscking weepee fairy that can't hold his ground
Mephisto_Helix
Resident Postwhore
His last charge was BS, this one wasn't ..... he led into Aplon with his head with the intent quite plain to see. He's lucky to only get 4 weeks.
Do you perhaps have a video clip of this event or some snapshots you can post?
I saw the replay on saturday and there was no foul play. It was simply bakkies clearing. It was a shame that a person of 74kg and 1.75 m was in the way but hell someone weighing in at 116 kg and that is 2.02m tall will obviously not hit him like a feather....
Vox Populi Vox Dei
High Tory
You could see by the way Bakkies looked back when he was walking away from the ruck that he knew he was in trouble. Aplon wasn't even contesting the ball. As he was cited by Freek Burger, I expect not many here will say it was biased.
:erm: i see the stormers nr1 doing the same thing.... only difference is bakkies came in harder.
As for aplon not contesting the ball? Are you blind? He binds to the ruck about 2 secs before bakkies comes into it.
Also watch from about 1:10 where you can clearly see in the slow motion (the reverse angle) that bakkies binds to another bulls player with his left hand! He still has his jersey in his left hand when he goes in thus he binds and thus he is not, not trying to bind. By the way the stormers nr 1 does not even try to bind....
Are we now going to start banning people for tackling too hard as well?
Watch from 20 secs in.
Anyway they must get clarity on this rule. If you are not allowed to enter the ruck at speed then make it a rule. If you are allowed to then the players should harden the hell up. Also if bakkies was sited why not the stormers nr1? Imo they did the same thing barring the fact that bakkies actually tried to bind....
Last edited: