Sentech says that all Pay-TV signal distribution players have to deal with the universal piracy problem
Pay-TV operators experience piracy problems
Pay-TV operators experience piracy problems
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Satellite Coverage
Sentech is currently broadcasting o*n Vivid via two satellites, namely Panamsat PAS 7 and PAS10. The following channels are available:* SA o*nly
Free to Air TV Channels:
* SABC News International
* CNBC Africa
* God TV
* Itv
* Spirit Word
* Maranatha TV
* Kruiskyk
* Eziekiel TV
* Frans 24
* Hope
* Christian Television
* Love World
Free Access TV Channels:
* SABC1
* SABC2
* SABC3
* E.TV
The article is about the FREE VIVID service.<snip>So to kill this form of piracy the only viable solution is to bring the content to the consumers first at a reasonable cost.<snip>
The article is about the FREE VIVID service.
Who would want to Pirate SABC channels... :wtf:
+1000Who would want to Pirate SABC channels... :wtf:
Yes, why would anyone pirate SABC?
How kuk is their own tv then?
I just lmao 100x
Don't know when last I watched SABC
Actually, the piracy problem is more massive than Multichoice cares to admit. Besides the kind of African piracy that is mentioned in the article there is the piracy that completely bypasses the satellite decoders and just downloads straight from the internet, but nevertheless eats into the multichoice market.
More and more people are canceling their DSTV subscriptions and downloading their content directly for themselves or from a friend and putting it on some form or media player or onto their computers. This is becoming more and more popular and informal physical or social networks are being set up to provide the content.
There are numerous beneficial reasons for doing this.
1) The content is usually free, unless some unscrupulous dealer charges you for it or you have to pay a fee to download it (usually your ISP costs and subscriptions to online sites).
2) There is no advertising.
3) There is no region protection, copy protection, encryption, or DRM.
4) The law is a quagmire of outdated copyright policies, loopholes and unenforced legislation.
5) It is private and on demand, the content can be viewed at any time and paused if necessary, or streamed live.
Now whether or not you view this activity as legal, illegal, theft, borrowing, etc... the fact is that it is happening. it is the not so "silent elephant in the room".
It has come about because of several reasons...
1) The price of content or access to licensed material is costly and exorbitant. For example a DSTV premium account now costs in the region of R530 a month. Blu-ray discs average around R270 each.
2) DSTV is supposed to be a pay subscription model, but carries heavy advertising.
3) The material is freely available on the internet, well organised and of good quality.
4) Unscrupulous middle men (retailers) are controlling the pricing and distribution of the content to the detriment of consumers.
5) DSTV is plagued with technical issues: Installation hurdles, storm downtime, episodes aired out of sequence, content not aired at the scheduled time, Buggy Decoder and PVR issues, etc.
6) The content being released from the USA is given to Africa out of time... often a year behind schedule. TV series are typically aired about 3 months to a year behind release in the USA.
All of this adds up to a situation where, in this world of quick and easy access, DSTV is quickly becoming outdated and out-performed by the Internet.
The Digital Satellite model has failed to adapt to this situation. Even Terrestrial Broadcast Television is at risk.
They should have launched their own websites with content to the Internet at reasonable rates years ago.
The fact is, right or wrong, people are accessing this content and there is little that the content owners can do to stop them, except to quit producing their content.
However they show or broadcast their content, somebody is going to pirate it.
So to kill this form of piracy the only viable solution is to bring the content to the consumers first at a reasonable cost.
If they don't or if they refuse to do this by clinging to their outdated distribution model they will have a war of attrition on their hands.
They can choose to fight it legally, but that is a time consuming and expensive process and only makes enemies of their target audience.
The only viable solution is to get with the times and begin providing the content where the consumers want it.