The Springbok logo is trademarked, that why there's the replica.it might be nice to see the springbok logo on the site![]()
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The Springbok logo is trademarked, that why there's the replica.it might be nice to see the springbok logo on the site![]()
Hey guys, I'm waiting for the site owner to put the redirects in (from www.savethespringbok.co.za), but in the meantime, the site is mostly done:
http://savethebok.bloghost.co.za/
Please crit and let us know what you think...
I'm liking it so far after a quick peek. Will do some in-depth checking now. I like the professionalism in even using an apostrophe before the word 'Bok as it should be.
Thanks King.
Good thinking in not wanting to step on toes with trademarked logos but perhaps we could ask permission to use it... after all if SARFU loses it the trademark will be meaningless.
Do you feel we should mail Oregon directly? I provided the contact details in post number 3 of this thread.
The Springbok was first used by the rugby team in a 1906 tour of England, led by Paul Roos.
The ANC came into being, or was founded in 1912.
For anybody to claim that this is a symbol of Apartheid or equal to the Swastika, is not just dumb, but illiterate to boot.
...
Is the petition working? Can I sign it? Site looks very good, congratulations guys.
Sure, I have never seen or heard of springbok shooting a black man, but there was the recent incident of a black woman being verbally abused by white rugby supporters at a match. Now to someone who does not have much interest in the sport, he will associate the Springbok symbol with this unfourtinate action.
"My experience 10 days ago should serve as a timely reminder that racism can still affect us . We should also not forget that racism is still as much an issue now as it has ever been.
"I reiterate that I do not hold rugby officials, the sport of rugby itself nor the stadium responsible for what has happened to me and I believe this symbolic stand against all forms of discrimination in the game is most important. It is a concerted effort that will help combat the scourge of racism within our sporting codes.
"I have been overwhelmed by the support I have had from rugby people - I am glad I can back them in this campaign."
The Springbok was first used by the rugby team in a 1906 tour of England, led by Paul Roos.
The ANC came into being, or was founded in 1912.
For anybody to claim that this is a symbol of Apartheid or equal to the Swastika, is not just dumb, but illiterate to boot.
The Springbok has been carried proudly into sports by our sportsmen and women for over 100 years, carried proudly by all races that make up our country.
It has been carried into battle by our troops in the 1st World War, and the 2nd World War, where they distinguised themselves in many battles in North Africa and Italy.
It is viewed with respect by sportsmen and women from all the nations of the world, especially those who have faced it across a field.
It has distinguished itself on the battlefield and on the sports field, it deserves to be respected and honoured.
The Springbok as a symbol ranks with the Stars and Stripes, the Haka, the Fleur de Lis, and the Red Lion of England.
It is not some little thing to be tossed aside for petty politics.
Anyone who considers removing this symbol, is doing those who have carried it proudly, those who have earned the right to wear it, a grave injustice, an insult to their achievements and their memories.
It is more than a symbol, it is a heritage a national treasure, and should be declared as such.
Is the petition working? Can I sign it? Site looks very good, congratulations guys.
Sure, I have never seen or heard of springbok shooting a black man, but there was the recent incident of a black woman being verbally abused by white rugby supporters at a match. Now to someone who does not have much interest in the sport, he will associate the Springbok symbol with this unfourtinate action.
BTW: The Swastika was used as a symbol of peace by both Germans and English troops during World War I.
Looks like it is just being tested now as I signed and commented but it did not change the numbers and also at the bottom of my post it said "test". We can hopefully get this sorted quick so we do not lose "votes".
Also was wondering where the comments will eventually appear. Mine was in the preview pane on the homepage but I assume they will eventually go into the blog? Or where?
Campaign launched to save Springbok emblem
South African rugby officials have vowed to fight for the future of the Springbok emblem, a symbol a top politician says highlights "the arrogance of white people".
Politicians decided on Friday that the Springbok emblem had to be lost from the World Cup-winner's playing jersey.
Following the resolution, next month's season-ending tour of Europe will be the final time the iconic jumping Bok will be worn on their jerseys.
The move was made to move the Springboks closer to transformation in South Africa, with the Springbok emblem viewed by some in power as a throwback to the Apartheid era.
However, SA Rugby boss Oregan Hoskins said the emblem would not go without a fight.
"I want to say that the Springbok emblem ought to be kept and maintained," Hoskins said.
"There are all sorts of reasons. But, chiefly, it's a brand that's supported by the majority of South Africans, as evidenced at the World Cup in 1995 but, more importantly, in October 2007, when we again celebrated winning the World Cup.
"It's an internationally recognised brand, worth an enormous sum of money. To change the emblem could have dire financial consequences for rugby in SA.
"I am aware that certain people are against the Springbok emblem. They've been quite influential.
"I think that, however, the vast majority of South Africans do not agree with that view. I hope that the majority feeling will take precedence."
Hoskins is now seeking support from ANC president Jacob Zuma in his battle to save one of world rugby's biggest icons.
The ANC has issued a statement saying they will survey its members and rugby fans before deciding on its stance.
Under the plan, politicians want all South African sporting teams to appear under the same logo.
Both the South African national cricket and netball teams are known as the Proteas, a native flower to the African nation.
Cedric Frolick, deputy chairman of the South African parliament's portfolio committee on sport, said that was now something he wanted the Springboks to fall into line with.
One of the ANC's historically stated pledges is for one national sports emblem.
And that certainly isn't a Springbok.
The decision to can the Bok logo was made at a two-day sporting seminar in the republic.
Sports Portfolio Committee chairman Butana Komphela told delegates: "The Springbok divides us. We have a responsibility to unite our country on one national emblem.
"Minister, I want you to observe the arrogance of white people on the Springbok emblem."
Komphela added there could be "no negotiation" on the Springbok emblem.
He also took aim at the refusal of some provinces from not displaying 'Say no to racism' logos on their shirts, calling it "rampant racism".
The redirect to the new site is now active.
October 15th, 2008 Sascoc passes the Bok
Sascoc has asked sports minister Makhenkesi Stofile for “direction” on the controversial Springbok emblem issue.
According to the National Sports Indaba resolution passed last week, Sascoc was required to write to SA Rugby and tell them to replace the Bok with the King Protea. However, on Tuesday Sascoc president Moss Mashishi was still waiting for a copy of the resolution from Stofile, and had also requested “direction” from the sports minister.
Stofile was due back in the country on Tuesday night.
Meanwhile, the Johannesburg Sport Council’s Junior Ramovha joined the chorus of those who say the Bok emblem should be scrapped. “We want people to understand that rugby is losing an opportunity to reposition itself in order to enhance unity in the country by sticking to the past,” he said.
Former Bok flyhalf Naas Botha also gave his two cents worth. “When I played, I played to represent my country. That took precedence. It didn’t matter to me what emblem we had.”
Andrew Talliard, 71, is life president of Progress Rugby Club which was formed in the same year that the springbok emblem was adopted by the national rugby team. Until four years ago, the club was a Cape Coloured side, all of whose players were banned from the national team under apartheid.
He said: "I have a Springbok blazer given to me by Saru for my work in rugby over the years, including Sacos (non-racial South African Council on Sport). I think it's a beautiful symbol and a unifying symbol. I don't have a problem with the springbok, despite its past, so we should keep it. I say forgive, but not forget. The Springbok is a part of all of us, whether we like it or not."
JOHANNESBURG: The Springbok has received overwhelming support within two weeks of a call by politicians for it to be scrapped.
SA Rugby has confirmed that it received more than 30 000 e-mails, faxes and letters in support of retaining the Springbok emblem for the national rugby team.
This was in reaction to the call at a recent national sports conference in Durban by Butana Komphela, the head of parliament's sports committee, for the scrapping of the emblem because it was "divisive".
SA Rugby chief executive Johan Prinsloo confirmed that the organisation had received a flood of e-mails, faxes and letters in support of the Springbok.
Fans of the emblem had taken it further, with the social networking site Facebook reporting a host of "save the Springbok" groups - one of which had 24 000 members.
A separate group had started a viral e-mail calling on Springbok fans to make December 1 "Springbok emblem day" and to display the logo in support of the campaign.
Cool thanks DJK, just a question, Is there anywhere I can see the no of petitions signed? I got about 60 people that said they supported the site after my/your/our mail that was sent, would be nice to see the numbers.