Poor local attendances

MartyMarts

Spontaneous Interruption
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
6,254
The TV blame game is a toss-up between Supersport, SABC and the sporting codes, with MONEY being the root of the evil!

Corruption. Corruption everywhere. With stuff like the EPL or F1 i.e. the big money sport I can understand Supersport buying up all the rights for eternity but local school/varsity stuff?

I remember a while back seeing highlights of "Craven Week" (? that school rugby tournament) on one of the Supersport channels and wondering to myself why that wasn't on SABC. And not just the highlights but all the games.
 

Electric

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
14,228
Corruption. Corruption everywhere. With stuff like the EPL or F1 i.e. the big money sport I can understand Supersport buying up all the rights for eternity but local school/varsity stuff?

I remember a while back seeing highlights of "Craven Week" (? that school rugby tournament) on one of the Supersport channels and wondering to myself why that wasn't on SABC. And not just the highlights but all the games.

I fully agree that the SABC as a national tv broadcaster should be more involved in local sport, not just soccer.
It should be a part of their marketing strategy.
But that does not mean it does not cost money to employ a team of guys to film and broadcast the games.

SABC should invest the money but won't.
 

MartyMarts

Spontaneous Interruption
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
6,254
I fully agree that the SABC as a national tv broadcaster should be more involved in local sport, not just soccer.
It should be a part of their marketing strategy.
But that does not mean it does not cost money to employ a team of guys to film and broadcast the games.

SABC should invest the money but won't.

I'm sure there's plenty of companies that would happily "invest" to have their logos splashed all over the place and on live TV. If they did it right, the SABC probably wouldn't even need to spend a cent to do this.
I bend over and take a R700 knock from multichoice every month yet I still have to often experience that "make the screen small to cater for some MTN rubbish" during live games and still have the Samsung logo plastered at the bottom :wtf:
 

Electric

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
14,228
That's a valid point.
I doubt the SABC have even approached possible investors/sponsors for local sport.
 

kalongbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
117
Then where is the silverware to prove it? Who gives a darn about meaningless between-matches, when they don't win the tournaments that matter, number one or not? If they really are number one, why can't they win matches that actually matter? I don't buy some meaningless stats figures.

No 1 test team, and you battle to term them cricket players? Odd!
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
Then where is the silverware to prove it? Who gives a darn about meaningless between-matches, when they don't win the tournaments that matter, number one or not? If they really are number one, why can't they win matches that actually matter? I don't buy some meaningless stats figures.
TEST team... and we do have that piece of "silverware" in our cabinet.

http://www.icc-cricket.com/team-rankings/test
 
Last edited:

Electric

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
14,228
And there was that one time when we got the silverware to say we were no1. in all aspects of the game.
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
images
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,382
I'm sure there's plenty of companies that would happily "invest" to have their logos splashed all over the place and on live TV. If they did it right, the SABC probably wouldn't even need to spend a cent to do this.
I bend over and take a R700 knock from multichoice every month yet I still have to often experience that "make the screen small to cater for some MTN rubbish" during live games and still have the Samsung logo plastered at the bottom :wtf:

I have my doubts - covering live sport is pretty expensive. Monochoice has a whole slew of suckers lining up to fund it.
 

MartyMarts

Spontaneous Interruption
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
6,254
I have my doubts - covering live sport is pretty expensive. Monochoice has a whole slew of suckers lining up to fund it.

Tbh, I have absolutely no idea of the costs involved - an area I know pretty much nothing about. But surely there must be a couple of rich [and not too bright :p] CEO's out there willing to pump some money into it something like this.
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,382
Tbh, I have absolutely no idea of the costs involved - an area I know pretty much nothing about. But surely there must be a couple of rich [and not too bright :p] CEO's out there willing to pump some money into it something like this.

If there's Supersport coverage at Wednesday's T20 match in East London I'll grab some behind the scenes photos for you. It should give you a rough idea.
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
If there's Supersport coverage at Wednesday's T20 match in East London I'll grab some behind the scenes photos for you. It should give you a rough idea.

Supersport 2
17:45 - 21:30 > Cricket - Ram Slam T20 Challenge: Chevrolet Warriors v Chevrolet Knights
 

MartyMarts

Spontaneous Interruption
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
6,254
If there's Supersport coverage at Wednesday's T20 match in East London I'll grab some behind the scenes photos for you. It should give you a rough idea.

Thanks, will be interesting. In my mind, a couple of cameramen, a dude switching between camera feeds, fat internet pipe (satellite uplink feed?) and it's sorted.

Hmmm... I'm starting to think my theory might have a hole or two :erm:
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,382
Supersport 2
17:45 - 21:30 > Cricket - Ram Slam T20 Challenge: Chevrolet Warriors v Chevrolet Knights
Thanks. Means I'm looking at an overnight in EL. Oh joy.
Thanks, will be interesting. In my mind, a couple of cameramen, a dude switching between camera feeds, fat internet pipe (satellite uplink feed?) and it's sorted.

Hmmm... I'm starting to think my theory might have a hole or two :erm:

More like 4-6 cameramen, their lakkies, 4-5 working the boards, support crew... A couple of 18 wheelers for production and equipment, satellite crew... There's more I'm forgetting about. Obviously you can't just have one setup to cover the nation.
 
Top