Ramaphosa suspends Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane

surface said:
Incompetency has been demonstrated amply by her defeats in various courts. Corruption - not really.
Click to expand...

I would say the corruption has been pretty well demonstrated in the enquiry with the sums of money paid to Dali, and that Ngobeni twat.
 
ToxicBunny said:
I would say the corruption has been pretty well demonstrated in the enquiry with the sums of money paid to Dali, and that Ngobeni twat.
Click to expand...
You reckon she paid X money (from PP office) with agreement that she will get X/3 back ?
 
surface said:
You reckon she paid X money (from PP office) with agreement that she will get X/3 back ?
Click to expand...
I think she is too incompetent for that...

She paid X money to people because they were in the right "faction", whether they paid her a portion of it I would say didn't happen. There was an element of favours being passed around would be my guess in all honesty.
 
ToxicBunny said:
I think she is too incompetent for that...

She paid X money to people because they were in the right "faction", whether they paid her a portion of it I would say didn't happen. There was an element of favours being passed around would be my guess in all honesty.
Click to expand...
sure, but what she did get in return? Zuma's socks ?
 
TheChamp said:
The 24hr state security?
Click to expand...
Right, but I thought it would be due to her in any case but maybe not under the circumstances. I vaguely remember her grumbling about enemies are after her etc.. but then mysterious assassins are trying to kill zuma since his birth so one never knows these things.
 
surface said:
Right, but I thought it would be due to her in any case but maybe not under the circumstances. I vaguely remember her grumbling about enemies are after her etc.. but then mysterious assassins are trying to kill zuma since his birth so one never knows these things.
Click to expand...
She probably manufactured those threats with her SSA buddies.
 
surface said:
Surely R11k must be peanuts for her? Unless she is in debt due to all court losses and personal cost judgements.

p.s. I still don't get the luxury part.
Click to expand...
It's probably all horribly subsidised. Don't expect the leeches in government skimping in luxury for their own accommodations.

It is surprising that they'd let her stay at her own cost. Surely if you don't qualify to stay there then you don't stay?
 
R13... said:
It's probably all horribly subsidised. Don't expect the leeches in government skimping in luxury for their own accommodations.

It is surprising that they'd let her stay at her own cost. Surely if you don't qualify to stay there then you don't stay?
Click to expand...
It's probably just bad reporting, the PP office are just trying to rectify the previous bad reporting about her being evicted. Remember there are three entities, SAPS who did the threat assessment, public works and PP office who are footing the bill, so the PP says they are terminating the lease because there is nothing on their side that allows such expenditure, SAPS has not come forward to say anything about the threat assessment and Public Works has also not said anything.

So what the office of the PP is saying is that they have no jurisdiction on whether she continues to stay there or not, but they can terminate the lease as it is seemingly dodgy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X