Report: Cop killings almost double

I wonder how many cops are killed in this country every year.
It's a dangerous job.
These stats about cops killing people would be a lot more meaningful if we actually knew how many were murders, how many were in self-defense, how many were accidental but justified, how many were on the job, off the job, due to ptsd, etc.
I don't envy them at all.

Maybe I will ask the department of criminology for it. Most of you probably know but South Africa has the most police killed in the world(not sure if it still is).
 
DreamKing;6086050]..................

Why didn’t you reply?


thanks to anc
That glib statement doesn’t help them; we actually used to get positive comments from residents in our township. Most people don’t know what goes on in the townships, what you see in the news is not even a quarter of it


you know what I mean, answer the question...... please :D
=> are the other african counties have better police forces than South Africa?
Yes / No? ....... :D
we know the answer. :D

Based on what we see in the press no


same as above =>

So you agree with my statement
.............
please! get to know EVERYTHING how it works before you are going to use it. :D
How do you get to know how to work a gun battle?

Fail is fail, you don't need to put so much excuses for your failure.
Please point out the exscuses and I havent had any failures

Remeber, TAXPAYERS are paying your salary!!!
Police pay tax to + plus as a reservist I wasn’t paid.
We tend to get the above from people who know they are in the wrong but try to wriggle out of it

Next time, a cook will come out shout at me when I make a complaint, "don't complain too much, you know nothing about cooking, it is so complicated to make a dish. It has too many different parameters, variable are endless." :rolleyes: :D
This is a stupid example as there is a worlds distance between cooking and been involved in a life and death gun battle.
 
the principle is the same.

we (the users) only concern about the outcome. how to make it works it is not the users businesses. it is the responsibility of the service provider.
Get it or not?

No it is not

If that is the case the dont tell us how to do our job as long as we get it done
 
yes, you win, ok?
[-]you don't read ......... so, what I can do? :confused:[/-]

yes, I am rubbish, you are hero. SAPS is the best, anc is the best cele is the best. All the accusations from the oppositions are rubbish.
happy? :D

Have you not read the replies, everyone here has acknowledged that there are problems and they need to be addressed immediately, where we disagree is your tactic of condemning the entire SAPS based on the officers who have committed criminal acts.

The SAPS is separate from the ANC, it is a function of the state and while the state is run by the ANC they can not dictate willy nilly to the SAPS. The SAPS function is defined by the constitution and relevant regulations that were promulgated by all parties in 1994 onwards
 
if the debate did not base on facts, but only emotional attitude to protect SAPS. The level is down to "anc debate". And it is worthless to keep on going.

such as……
1) "not ALL" / "not entire" (real meaning not abstract to “mostly”) => I know. if you put "entire" / "all" =>99.99999% of the statement will turn from "true" to "false". It is not a rational response.

2)"in principle" => (I don't think that you may understand the concept, it is a very difficult concept. If you know what concrete maths is, you know what I am talking about.)
for example, 1 + 1 = 2 right? but x + x = 2 is that implied x = 1? NO.

3) "This is a stupid example as there is a worlds distance between cooking and been involved in a life and death gun battle. "

this is an utter BS statement. We have to prove the user is enough to know the outcome only or not, we are not debating what the nature of such “thing” is. The statement is void.

seriously, if you understand it or not, I won't explain it further, it is just waste of my time. You can keep dream for "SAPS is the best". I don't care. ok?
 
if the debate did not base on facts, but only emotional attitude to protect SAPS. The level is down to "anc debate". And it is worthless to keep on going.

such as……
1) "not ALL" / "not entire" (real meaning not abstract to “mostly”) => I know. if you put "entire" / "all" =>99.99999% of the statement will turn from "true" to "false". It is not a rational response.

2)"in principle" => (I don't think that you may understand the concept, it is a very difficult concept. If you know what concrete maths is, you know what I am talking about.)
for example, 1 + 1 = 2 right? but x + x = 2 is that implied x = 1? NO.

3) "This is a stupid example as there is a worlds distance between cooking and been involved in a life and death gun battle. "

this is an utter BS statement. We have to prove the user is enough to know the outcome only or not, we are not debating what the nature of such “thing” is. The statement is void.

seriously, if you understand it or not, I won't explain it further, it is just waste of my time. You can keep dream for "SAPS is the best". I don't care. ok?

Based on your facts which do not equate to a whole but rather a portion there of.

There is no ANC debate here, they do not figure except as political interference at a level above the work been done at street level, which is the actual area that we are debating.

You are attempting to put it all into math’s which is Black and White with no in between, I have got news for you the world mainly tends to operate in Grey and I have yet to see a mathematical solution to the human equation.

this is an utter BS statement. We have to prove the user is enough to know the outcome only or not, we are not debating what the nature of such “thing” is. The statement is void.

If I read this correctly, you are saying that based on who the user is i.e. SAPS Member, that the out come is X, with no variation?

Have you not read the replies, everyone here has acknowledged that there are problems and they need to be addressed immediately, where we disagree is your tactic of condemning the entire SAPS based on the officers who have committed criminal acts.
 
Last edited:
Based on your facts which do not equate to a whole but rather a portion there of.

There is no ANC debate here, they do not figure except as political interference at a level above the work been done at street level, which is the actual area that we are debating.

You are attempting to put it all into math’s which is Black and White with no in between, I have got news for you the world mainly tends to operate in Grey and I have yet to see a mathematical solution to the human equation.



If I read this correctly, you are saying that based on who the user is i.e. SAPS Member, that the out come is X, with no variation?

"where we disagree is your tactic of condemning the entire SAPS" => read (1) above

"the world mainly tends to operate in Grey" :rolleyes:

"I have yet to see a mathematical solution to the human equation." => another void statement
 
[DreamKing;6096852]"where we disagree is your tactic of condemning the entire SAPS" => read (1) above

where we disagree is your tactic of condemning the entire SAPS based on the officers who have committed criminal acts.

the world mainly tends to operate in Grey" :rolleyes
So you don’t believe that?

"I have yet to see a mathematical solution to the human equation." => another void statement
Exactly why is it void, you were the one who wanted to try and be smart by using math’s to get your point across

:rolleyes:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X