if the debate did not base on facts, but only emotional attitude to protect SAPS. The level is down to "anc debate". And it is worthless to keep on going.
such as……
1) "not ALL" / "not entire" (real meaning not abstract to “mostly”) => I know. if you put "entire" / "all" =>99.99999% of the statement will turn from "true" to "false". It is not a rational response.
2)"in principle" => (I don't think that you may understand the concept, it is a very difficult concept. If you know what concrete maths is, you know what I am talking about.)
for example, 1 + 1 = 2 right? but x + x = 2 is that implied x = 1? NO.
3) "This is a stupid example as there is a worlds distance between cooking and been involved in a life and death gun battle. "
this is an utter BS statement. We have to prove the user is enough to know the outcome only or not, we are not debating what the nature of such “thing” is. The statement is void.
seriously, if you understand it or not, I won't explain it further, it is just waste of my time. You can keep dream for "SAPS is the best". I don't care. ok?