Republican primaries.

I wonder if he would change his mind if it was his wife that was raped and pregnant.

Of course not. Politicians say what they think will get them the most votes.

Conservatives, Democrats, doesn't really matter they all talk rubbish and don't believe half the stuff they say.

Mitt Romney for example, isn't he known as a flip-flopper because he changes his views as much as his underwear?

Psh, politicians.
 
That cannot be for real, surely? :wtf:

I dislike what the Republicans stand for any way, but this just makes it a million times worse!! :mad:

Santorum is a scum bag. Doesn't really matter, anyway, because he won't get the primary.

Speaking in Woodland Park, Colorado on Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate and self-proclaimed Christian, Rick Santorum told the mother of a child with a rare genetic disorder that she shouldn’t have a problem paying $1 million a year for the prescription drug Abilify because Apple’s iPad can cost around $900 (video below).

Santorum said: “People have no problem paying $900 for an iPad. But paying $900 for a drug they have a problem with it keeps you alive. Why? Because you’ve been conditioned to think health care is something you can get without having to pay for it.”

Santorum then repeated the talking point often used by Big Pharma: “Look, I want your son and everybody to have the opportunity to stay alive on much-needed drugs. But the bottom line is, we have to give companies the incentive to make those drugs. And if they don’t have the incentive to make those drugs, your son won’t be alive and lots of other people in this country won’t be alive.”

Except Santorum is plain wrong. Many drugs have been discovered without financial incentive, including the polio vaccine which was discovered by Jonas Salk. Santorum also failed to mention that many countries in Europe have discovered groundbreaking vaccines which sell for much less that U.S. drugs because they are subsidized by their governments.
 
426366_365990670102023_125955227438903_1162123_1106717943_n.jpg
 
If Paul pulls his delegates away and goes independent, then Obama will win, but it actually might mean a lot more long-term.
 
Paul cannot win as an Independent or a Republican at this stage.

I really think that the Republicans are handing it to Obama on a plate at this stage. Not that it upsets me of course :p
 
I can't believe so many care.

If you don't care then you are ignoring the fact that if America sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold.

Of course you should care!!

Put a Yahoo in charge of the States and the rest of us will suffer, like it or not!

We had to suffer two terms of the Cretin Bush stuffing up the world in his wake. Do we really need another Republican @sshole at this point?
 
I can't believe so many care.

More people on mybb care about the US elections than Americans.

These people are obsessed with America. It's not healthy. I mean, don't they have their own country to obsess about ?
 
More people on mybb care about the US elections than Americans.

These people are obsessed with America. It's not healthy. I mean, don't they have their own country to obsess about ?
That's what the other ten thousand threads in CA are for. :)
 
:D:D

Sits back and waits for Alan....:whistle:

Why? He'll say what he normally says "Ohmygod obama doesn't even know how many states in the US wtf lol"

He words it slightly better than I.
 
Why? He'll say what he normally says "Ohmygod obama doesn't even know how many states in the US wtf lol"

He words it slightly better than I.

That be true! :D

If we don't get the States story, there'll be some remark about teleprompters or birth certificates!! ;)
 
Romney...omg no...Obama isnt great...but hell, Romney would be a catastrophy to the entire world.
 
Meanwhile...back in Washington...

Washington (CNN) -- The campaigns of President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney don't agree on much. But on one subject, officials from both sides are in sync.
As the GOP primary race goes into its third official month, the biggest winner appears to be the president.
Referring to rivals Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, a Romney campaign staffer said, "The only person's odds of winning are increasing are President Barack Obama's," arguing it was time for Gingrich and Santorum to depart the race.
Several leading Republicans have publicly echoed that sentiment in recent days, confronted with poll numbers showing the president's job approval rating above 50% for the first time in months -- a far cry from last fall when he was mired in the low 40s.
The ongoing Republican infighting has dragged down Romney's favorability rating among swing voters, forced him to awkwardly pivot right from stances that otherwise would have resonated with a broader electorate in the fall and led to a series of gaffes that could have been avoided had the former Massachusetts governor sewed up the nomination weeks ago.
All the while, Obama's own campaign machinations have largely skated under the radar, allowing him to appear to be the adult in the room as the Republican candidates fight over contraception, illegal immigration, the minimum wage and each others' pasts.
In the process, Obama's favorability among key voting blocs such as women and Latinos has jumped significantly. And most important, recent surveys suggest the president has rebounded among independent voters, a swath of the electorate that catapulted him to victory four years ago but had abandoned him during his presidency.
Equally disturbing to Republicans are a series of recent surveys showing the president handily beating Romney in a head-to-head contest, a reversal from October when Romney held a slight lead.
That trend led conservative stalwart George Will last week to forecast Romney is headed for a Barry Goldwater-esque defeat come November.
Ongoing Republican sniping has also allowed the Obama campaign to steadily build its campaign apparatus behind the scenes, opening scores of field offices in every key state out of which staffers and volunteers methodically resurrect the unparalleled get-out-the-vote effort from four years ago.
"We're using this time to build while they're destroying each other," top Obama adviser David Axelrod said earlier this week.
The campaign has also restricted its advertising to one positive spot on the president's energy policy, a subject Democrats believe will be among the key issues in the fall as gas prices rise. The campaign is also set to release a 17-minute documentary-style video next week showcasing the president's achievements during his first term.
At the same time, Obama's lack of a direct opponent has allowed him to stay on message and conduct the re-election bid on his own terms. Conveniently, Obama avoids commenting on his likely Republican opponent until the nomination is actually wrapped up. But that hasn't stopped the president from goading the Republicans at nearly every turn, often trying to upstage them -- like his White House news conference on the GOP's Super Tuesday -- before every key primary this season.
Of course, it was only four years ago when some Democrats were making similar doom-and-gloom predictions about their own contentious nominating fight, during which then-Sen. Hillary Clinton and Obama exchanged heated rhetoric well into May.
But forecasts that such bickering would harm the eventual nominee's candidacy were all but forgotten two months later when Clinton offered a resounding endorsement of her onetime opponent at the Democrats' national convention. Meanwhile, fears that Clinton's ardent supporters wouldn't vote for Obama come November largely never materialized.
Republicans are holding out hope for a similar outcome on their side, mindful that most Americans aren't paying close heed to the ins and outs of the GOP race.
"I get the feeling there's a real disconnect between the political class that's paying attention to all of this and what the public thinks," said Ari Fleischer, the former press secretary to President George W. Bush and a CNN contributor. He's predicting that most of the GOP infighting will be forgotten once the party rallies around a nominee.
"I'm seeing more and more conservatives who aren't Romney fans starting to say, 'You know what, it's time to start fighting Barack Obama and stop fighting ourselves,' " Erick Erickson, a CNN contributor and founder of Redstate.com, said earlier this week.
But senior officials on the president's campaign argue the parallels between 2008 and 2012 are tenuous at best. For starters, the long Democratic primary campaign four years ago was widely believed to burnish Obama as a candidate. Not so with Romney, who has made a string of verbal missteps and shows little sign of getting more comfortable on the campaign trail.
Democrats also argue the Obama and Clinton sniping pales in comparison to that of the Republican candidates this year, each of whom have spent millions of dollars on negative commercials and have sparred repeatedly during 20 televised debates. The result is a Republican primary electorate largely unsatisfied with its crop of candidates and showing little enthusiasm at the polls.
"That lack of enthusiasm among Republicans is real, and it's unmistakable," said Jim Messina, the president's campaign manager, pointing to low voter turnout figures. Adding to that contention is a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll showing GOP enthusiasm since the fall has ticked down 13 points, to 51%.
Finally, the president's supporters maintain Obama and Clinton did not shift leftward on key positions during their primary battle, forestalling the need for an awkward trek back to the middle during the fall campaign.
In contrast, Romney has been forced to embrace more conservative positions on several key issues that could make courting independents voters difficult come November.
"They think they can wipe the slate clean," Axelrod said. "The American people take his words seriously and his positions seriously ... we're going to hold him to them."
 
I've watched loads of Ron Paul videos, and the man makes complete sense. The others are so inept and Ron Paul owns them everytime.

How can anyone not understand or agree with what Paul is saying ?? :confused:

Ron Paul 2012.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X