RIP Charlie Kirk

MiW said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1966651875752628231
Click to expand...
So,this guy is actually onto something partially,but it's far deeper and worse. Now I hate posting Tiktoks on anything,but this was the most fascinating and succinct breakdown of what is *likely* this entire story end to end - a few things weren't making entirely sense to me initially,but it comes together brilliantly


Short of it: Groypers (far right,Nick Fuentez's mob) a chronically online Memelord group,took out the competition in Charlie Kirk for "Rightwing Youth Talking Head" and can now step up and radicalize them further right
This answered my own questions on the Bullet writings specifically too
1* Furry meme
2* Helldivers 500Kg bomb
3* Farcry 6 Bella Ciao
4* "If you're reading this you're gay" trolling
 
Jet-Fighter7700 said:
same kind of people who tried and failed to kill Trump,
same kind of people who prevent people evacuating a Military zone for their own safety.

the world is full of crazies, hopefully in the days and weeks we will find out what crazy person did this.
and the response from Trump, that will be heavy handed, swift and unmerciful.

interesting this happens on Sept 11.
Click to expand...
Means the idea was fomenting for a long time. And the planning was pretty good and premeditated. Smells of a demented loner.
 
Geoff.D said:
Exactly! But they won't. Because they are the one fomenting all the problems in the World right now. Spouting their intolerance of anyone who does not agree with their distorted views.

And already some on this forum are showing their true colours.
Click to expand...
The point both Left and Right continue to miss, is that a solution doesn't need to be an either-or. It can be a win-win.

Who can guess how a win-win solution can be achieved?
 
It should be clear to any rational human being that unlawful killing, politically motivated or otherwise, should be condemned in the strongest terms.

I can't help thinking that if any one of several SA politicians was taken out, that some of the people expressing the most outrage and indignation in this thread would suddenly be acting in the very manner they supposedly detest.

I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
 
Using the level of agitation between Left and Right, one can more or less accurately guage the desperation of the 3rd-party parasite that feeds off this unnecessary hostile energy.

Hostilities can only persist where both can a) continue to be agitated against one another, AND

b) remain confined to a single legal jurisdiction.

Both are necessary to sustain the leviathan parasite that feeds on both.
 
lexity said:
The point both Left and Right continue to miss, is that a solution doesn't need to be an either-or. It can be a win-win.

Who can guess how a win-win solution can be achieved?
Click to expand...
You’re right, the Left and Right often talk past each other like it’s a zero-sum game. But win-win solutions usually come when both sides stop trying to own the issue and start asking: what do we actually agree on?
For example: people want safety and freedom, prosperity and fairness, tradition and progress. The trick is building policies that balance those instead of cancelling one side out.

Maybe the real question is: what’s one area we can all agree matters, no matter which camp you’re in? That’s where a win-win can start.
 
lexity said:
The point both Left and Right continue to miss, is that a solution doesn't need to be an either-or. It can be a win-win.

Who can guess how a win-win solution can be achieved?
Click to expand...

Well it obviously can't be secession you're referring to - you'd never do that; so I'm assuming your solution must be a lekker bring and braai.
 
BBSA said:
You’re right, the Left and Right often talk past each other like it’s a zero-sum game. But win-win solutions usually come when both sides stop trying to own the issue and start asking: what do we actually agree on?
For example: people want safety and freedom, prosperity and fairness, tradition and progress. The trick is building policies that balance those instead of cancelling one side out.

Maybe the real question is: what’s one area we can all agree matters, no matter which camp you’re in? That’s where a win-win can start.
Click to expand...
When each side take turns in wielding the power of the ring this route is sadly not viable.

They with each swing of the political pendulum... continue to feed the parasite.

The only way remaining is for one side to starve - not the other side - but the parasite.

That means declaring independence.

Soon after, the other political side will be also freed from the parasite.

That is how both Red and Blue win this. Otherwise both will succumb.
 
vigras rojara said:
Well it obviously can't be secession you're referring to - you'd never do that; so I'm assuming your solution must be a lekker bring and braai.
Click to expand...
If you're not coming with a potential solution.... you're in the way.

You probably don't believe there is such a thing as a conscience... so perhaps you're not worried about what being an obstacle means for you.

You don't sound all that worried, to me.
 
lexity said:
If you're not coming with a potential solution.... you're in the way.

You probably don't believe their is such a thing as a conscience... so perhaps you're not worried about what being an obstacle means for you.

You don't sound all that worried, to me.
Click to expand...

Enjoy your bring and braai, although I doubt the CI movement has the competence to even arrange one of those, based on their performance to date.

Perhaps Phil MaPockets can appeal to Trump for some wors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X