SA Politics Thread Part 10 : The GNU Has Crashed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Problem is that even when they get machines and everything failure rate is over 80%.

What I'm struggling with is that during restitution over 90% of people took money so by now this should be sorted out.
Are same people that got money wanting land again of government is dishing land to people that were not affected?
The money they get isn't a lot and I suspect they do get screwed by politicians and other assorted at the payout. It's normally too many people for the money to be life changing and then when the politicians and their friends take their illegal cut you get left with nothing.

So, the problem with the failing farms is similar. They are given to people who want to get rich quick. Government provides funds but little oversight so when the training ends the farms collapse to neglect and siphoning of funds at both farm and government level.

A famous estate in limpopo failed because the municipal official responsible let her former criminal tavern owner boyfriend run it for the beneficiaries. It quickly went the way of the dodo as the funding got funneled through the official and boyfriend.
 
The money they get isn't a lot and I suspect they do get screwed by politicians and other assorted at the payout. It's normally too many people for the money to be life changing and then when the politicians and their friends take their illegal cut you get left with nothing.

So, the problem with the failing farms is similar. They are given to people who want to get rich quick. Government provides funds but little oversight so when the training ends the farms collapse to neglect and siphoning of funds at both farm and government level.

A famous estate in limpopo failed because the municipal official responsible let her former criminal tavern owner boyfriend run it for the beneficiaries. It quickly went the way of the dodo as the funding got funneled through the official and boyfriend.
So it failed....

Does that mean the orriginal claimants can go ask for more more restitution again ?
 
You seem to struggle to grasp the concept of land claims due to dispossessions and government leasing the land it owns to people.
And you fail to understand that leasing is not where the gov wants to be. It has long said the land has to be given ( ie not leased ) to the people living on it. ( as per a parliamentary report in 2020 )

This is what happens when things are not done in time
It fails then they want more handouts ( ie additional restitution )

 

Firstly, amending the Preamble of the Constitution, specifically the text “South Africa belongs to all who live in it”, is necessary to correct its persistent misinterpretation, which has been used to extend constitutional protections to those residing in the country illegally.

In practice, this deliberate misreading has placed undue pressure on limited public resources and compromised the government’s responsibility to prioritise the needs of South Africans. A carefully considered revision is required to reaffirm the original intent of this principle and prevent its continued misappropriation, without undermining the inclusive spirit of the Constitution.
No, 8 trillion times no. It would only open a slippery slope...

To amend Section 26 of the Constitution to remove the universal nature of the right to housing, by clarifying that the obligation to provide Temporary Emergency Accommodation (TEA) in instances of illegal land or property occupation is limited to South African citizens and persons lawfully present in the country.
This, I don't even get? What's the alternative?

Here's Section 26, subsection 1:
"Everyone has the right to have access to adequate housing."
 

  • A new regulation will loosen the grip that the State Information Technology Agency has on IT procurement in South Africa.
  • Inefficiencies and mismanagement at the agency have frustrated many government entities.
  • The rules will allow government entities to procure IT systems independently if they can motivate that it will be cheaper or faster than through the Agency.
  • For more financial stories, go to the News24 Business front page.
New regulations will allow government entities to procure IT systems outside of the ailing State Information Technology Agency (SITA) if they can motivate that it will be cheaper or faster.

Communications and Digital Technology Minister Solly Malatsi published a proclamation in the Government Gazette that loosened SITA’s grip on the procurement of IT services.

The regulation came into effect on 1 June.

This is music to the ears of some government entities, including the Department of Home Affairs and the South African Police Service, who have complained about working through SITA when procuring critical IT systems.


SITA is the organisation responsible for procuring and maintaining IT systems for government entities.

Until now, government departments have been forced to procure mandatory IT services through SITA due to stipulations in regulations under the SITA Act. Departments were not obligated to procure so-called optional services through SITA but could choose to appoint SITA for the job.

The new regulations published on 23 May will allow departments to give written notice to SITA of a plan to procure IT services themselves when they are of the opinion that SITA will not be able to satisfy its requirements and that they will be able to procure the system either more cheaply or more quickly.

SITA will then be given 10 days to respond to that notice.


If SITA fails to respond in time; responds by saying that it is unable to procure the IT system; or comes back with a counter-proposal that does not convince the procuring entity that SITA will do the work more cheaply or quickly, then the entity has the right to go ahead and procure the system itself, following normal procurement law.

Malatsi said that the flexibility to procure outside of SITA would improve public services for all South Africans, in a statement from April, foreshadowing the new regulations.

“This flexibility can improve public services for all South Africans by ensuring that government can respond faster and spend resources more efficiently, something which has been requested by several government departments for some time,” he said.

Inefficiencies at SITA have raised the ire of several departments.

A recent Auditor-General report stated that the average turnaround time of procurement requests at SITA is 123 days. The audit outcome of SITA also regressed to a disclaimer, and the agency is the subject of a corruption probe by the Special Investigating Unit.

In December last year, MPs in the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technology attended a 10-hour briefing during which the dysfunction in the Agency was laid bare.

READ | Inside govt's broken IT agency: Fights, and more fights

The most vocal critic of SITA has been the Department of Home Affairs, which announced that it had applied to be formally separated from SITA to procure IT systems from more reliable and cost-effective external partners.

READ | Home Affairs’ plan to divorce SITA gets messy

Modernising Home Affairs’ IT systems has been a big focus of Minister Leon Schreiber since he took office.

Accelerating digital transformation is also one of the pillars of the recently launched second phase of Operation Vulindlela.


The head of corporate affairs at SITA, Tlali Tlali, said the new regulations will give extra impetus to efforts to reform SITA.

“Our position is that these new regulations bring about an added impetus to the urgency of reforms required at SITA in the procurement environment to mitigate the risks associated with dissatisfied clients.

“It is a call for SITA to move with speed in implementing crucial interventions to avoid further erosion of confidence in our abilities to render services to our clients,” said Tlali.

He said that the Department of Communications and Digital Technology (DCDT) invited SITA to provide input on the proposed regulations before they were published.

“We confirm that we submitted our representations to DCDT and canvassed a range of critical considerations (that include adverse financial impact on SITA and security vulnerabilities to clients) we believe the shareholder had to attach weight to,” he said.

Tlali also said that, in SITA’s view, the new regulations are “an option of last resort” for procuring entities after satisfying other measures in the regulations.

“In other words, the new regulations do not unconditionally present an ‘open sesame’ to government departments to procure from the market in the first instance at the exclusion of SITA.

“This, in our view, presents a lifeline to SITA to demonstrate that we are still relevant to our clients and can continue to add value,” said Tlali.
 
At best all this will achieve is to spread the corruption outside of SITA and into the various government departments. It doesn't seem to be cutting out the middleman tenders, all it does is to capitalize on SiTA's ineptitude to shift corruption.
Because there isn't or hasn't been corruption in the rest of the government before this...

Also, SITA must be one of those fated "Corrupt but effective" type SOEs we hear so much about
 
Stand back, amateurs. We may have a brand new kid on the block to shake up things a bit.

"The IEC has confirmed that any party seeking registration must comply with constitutional requirements, including prohibitions on hate speech or incitement to violence."

How come the EFF is still registered?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X