Samsung Galaxy S5

Have Sony phones ever been as popular as Samsung's?

Ask kingrob, he is the one that is singing their praises recently. I was only pointing out that based purely on GSM Arena "interest" the S5 is proving to be getting the most attention. Whether this reflects in sales only time will tell.
 
Samsung has a much bigger advertising budget than Sony.

So, you might have a great product to sell, but if nobody knows about it, you wont be selling anything.

Just ask HTC how it worked out for them when they decided to cut on advertising.

Samsung also made a fantastic device, called the Galaxy S2, that was a runaway success and the first real alternative to an iPhone. Lots of street cred.
 
If the Z2 had capacitive navigation buttons on that fat lower front bezel it would be the perfect phone for me. Such a shame...
 
Not sure...

I've got capacitive keys, so I wouldn't know.

/shrug

I shouldn't have phrased that as a question :) my bad. KitKat does not have me feel that I am losing out on screen estate anymore, since the transparent on-screen buttons and immersive mode have come into play.
 
What's wrong with on-screen keys?

It's just completely retarded to have space for hardware keys and to then use software keys. It's a waste of space, particularly when using the on-screen keyboard. Sure, the phones that have virtual navigation buttons are perfectly usable, but the idiocy of it would bother me every time I used the phone.
 
It's just completely retarded to have space for hardware keys and to then use software keys. It's a waste of space, particularly when using the on-screen keyboard. Sure, the phones that have virtual navigation buttons are perfectly usable, but the idiocy of it would bother me every time I used the phone.

The bezel isn't there just to cater for capacitive keys, mind. Google's direction of Android eschews hardware buttons, and KitKat does well to show this better. Immersive mode hides the on screen keys when in-app, so the waste of space aspect is negated.

In terms of reliability, it also makes slightly more sense to go with on screen buttons.
 
The bezel isn't there just to cater for capacitive keys, mind. Google's direction of Android eschews hardware buttons, and KitKat does well to show this better. Immersive mode hides the on screen keys when in-app, so the waste of space aspect is negated.

In terms of reliability, it also makes slightly more sense to go with on screen buttons.

Yes, but as long as large bezels are around they may as well be fully utilised. Immersive mode is a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist. Reliability is only an issue if a device has shoddy build quality. The Z2 is a prime example - side by side with an S4 it is clear which layout makes more sense. I also don't like the idea of having a virtual home button below the space bar when typing.
 
Yes, but as long as large bezels are around they may as well be fully utilised. Immersive mode is a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist. Reliability is only an issue if a device has shoddy build quality. The Z2 is a prime example - side by side with an S4 it is clear which layout makes more sense. I also don't like the idea of having a virtual home button below the space bar when typing.

I share your sentiments. But it seems we are in the minority. Most people appreciate Google's emphasis on on-screen buttons.

For the time being, I'm perfectly happy to use the capacitive buttons on the S4. I just wish the home button was capacitive too (the pressing of a physical button has a cheapish feel to it).
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X