Sinbad
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Messages
- 89,083
- Reaction score
- 41,870
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
So in short -- we care more about the use of "a" and "an" than whether someone commits an act of 'terrorism' against SANRAL.
What's the bigger crime here, really?
So in short -- we care more about the use of "a" and "an" than whether someone commits an act of 'terrorism' against SANRAL.
How is this terrorism, btw? The substances were harmless. Bomb threats and threats like these are a crime, AFAIK, but how can it be terrorism when no terrorism was committed?
Going against or standing up against government has always been called terrorism.
Trust mybb however to turn news into a discusion about language.
Having false scares hardly counts as standing up against the government. Although I do wonder what the public's reaction would be if the anthrax or the bomb were real and actually caused destruction to sanral offices?
The motive for the suspect's alleged offence is unknown, investigations are continuing," said Ramaloko.
LOL, calling in a bomb scare may be a bit of an extreme if he does not want to either pay toll fees or get off work for the day
So many nazis....
Still waiting for the explanation as to how this constitutes an act of terrorism?
S isn't a vowel. You use 'an' if the next word starts with a vowel.
It's the effect that was caused... the stopping of the work and the evacuation of the buildings. Also expenses related to that, and the instilling of fear in the employees. Those all attract pretty serious charges.
"There are elements in society hellbent on undermining the peace and security of their fellow citizens. These backward and uncivilised individuals have elected to ignore all platforms made available to them by our Constitution to raise whatever concerns they may have," says Minister Peters.
See post #16.
It's the effect that was caused... the stopping of the work and the evacuation of the buildings. Also expenses related to that, and the instilling of fear in the employees. Those all attract pretty serious charges.
This seems terribly vague, though. A person having a psychotic break that starts waving around a knife in an office building would have the same effect yet they wouldn't be charged with terrorism.