SAPS declares universities "level 3 security situation"

Jan

Who's the Boss?
Staff member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
14,773
Reaction score
13,417
Location
The Rabbit Hole
Dear colleagues and students

We face a level of protest this morning which we are not able to contain with private security officers alone. The South African Police Service (SAPS) is on campus in an attempt to manage the situation.

As you are probably aware, groups of protesters are disrupting activities across middle and upper campus. Unlawful acts, such as breaking windows, forcing open locked doors and throwing human sewage, have been reported. There are further reports of intimidation, damage to property, violence, disruption and confrontation with security officers and we need the support of SAPS’s Public Order Policing to manage the situation.

In addition, we face a situation where we have been informed that several universities, including UCT, have been declared a level-three security situation by the national commissioner of SAPS, which, in effect, means that the Public Order Police are in command of the situation. We appeal to staff and students not to interfere with the work of members of SAPS and not to contribute to confrontations or any situation of conflict.

Protest action began early this morning when protesters blocked the Jammie Shuttle stop outside Leo Marquard residence. Jammie Shuttle services have been suspended due to the actions of protesters. A radio was reportedly taken from a security guard. The dean of law ordered the Kramer Law building evacuated after a group of about 100 protesters broke a window, forced a door open, invaded the building and threw human sewage in the corridors. Protesters also briefly demonstrated inside the School of Economics building. SAPS used a stun grenade to disperse protesters outside the RW James building after confrontations were reported between protesters and security officers.

We urge students and staff members to remain calm and to move away from any areas where protest activity may put you at risk.

UCT remains committed to attempting to manage the situation so that the academic year can be completed successfully.

Please note that the above message is shared based on information that is currently available.

Communication and Marketing Department
 
Interesting how quick they are to act now with police support now that they have realised that they have lost complete control over the situation. Here I thought that the police were the bad guys… is that not right UCT?
 
That "decolonization" is working at last! A prestigious establishment that used to focus on levels 6 and up (NQF levels that is) has now gone down to "level 3" ... :p
 
For god's sake, arrest them, expedite their cases, make examples of them and send them off to prison. We are in the midst of a national crisis.

These are not students anymore, they are violent and destructive criminals.
 
What exactly does "Level 3 security situation" mean?

I've tried to find it online, but nothing.
 
What exactly does "Level 3 security situation" mean?

I've tried to find it online, but nothing.

It means the situation has escalated past levels 1 and 2 :)

Other than that, sounds like they made it up...
 
What exactly does "Level 3 security situation" mean?

I've tried to find it online, but nothing.

Public order policing

https://africacheck.org/wp-content/...ce-Service-Data-on-Crowd-Incidents-Report.pdf (PDF)

Level One: A peaceful gathering and less significant sport, entertainment or social event which can be policed by members of Visible Policing at station level or the Metro Police - no threat or need for the use of force is envisaged. The POP unit must be on standby.

Level Two: Unconfirmed information regarding a possibility of a threat against lives and property. Members of Visible Policing at station level and the Metro police must be the primary role players, with the relevant POP unit in reserve at the scene.

Level Three: Confirmed information regarding a likely threat to lives and property. The POP unit must take operational command.

The thinking is that Level Three situations are linked to POP intervention and could well end up as unrest incidents. Levels One and Two, where POP is on standby or reserve, should be peaceful incidents. The Instruction addresses the problem of ‘unforeseen (spontaneous) gatherings’ where threat levels cannot be determined in advance and station level Visible Policing units or Metro Police are likely to be first on the scene. It sets out a step by step approach aimed at avoiding confrontation until a POP contingent arrives, but there is one exception. ‘If a national road is being blocked’, states the Instruction, ’the road needs to be cleared first before negotiations may start’. In this situation, the incident ought to be recorded as ‘unrest’ even though there is no violence and no POP intervention.

The critical point is that whether an incident is defined as unrest or peaceful is determined by whether the police have intervened, not by whether there has been violence.
 
What exactly does "Level 3 security situation" mean?

I've tried to find it online, but nothing.

Probably external jargon but I imagine its pretty high because with only level 1+2 above that they have to include natural disasters, mass shootings, hostages, terror etc.
 
For god's sake, arrest them, expedite their cases, make examples of them and send them off to prison. We are in the midst of a national crisis.

These are not students anymore, they are violent and destructive criminals.

Na, need to wait for trials like everyone else. Need some time to think their actions over.
 
The last time that POP was mobilised against these protests was when the students, workers and whomever else marched on parliament. They were also deployed at the Union Building. I'm not seeing the media reporting on the POP dispersing the threat at UCT???
 
Going to leave this here, the statement by UCT when the students marched on parliament,

https://www.uct.ac.za/usr/press/2015/MediaRelease_23October2015.pdf (PDF)

Joint Statement:

Excessive Use of Force by the South African Police Service (SAPS)

We are deeply concerned about the excessive use of force displayed by the SAPS Public Order Policing members against unarmed protesting students at Parliament and other parts of South Africa this week. These were not isolated incidents as we have witnessed an intensification of police violence against protesting citizens, particularly poor and marginalised people in recent years. The Marikana Massacre remains at the forefront of our minds. Last year the SAPS paid out close to R200 million in civil claims due to excessive use of force by its members (including shootings), money that could have been better spent on education and healthcare.

...

We support Prof Pierre De Vos’ comments of earlier this week that: “Members of the SAPS who use force without complying with the provisions of Section 9 of the Regulation of Gatherings Act must be prosecuted for assault and disciplined accordingly. Members of the SAPS who comply with the formal requirements of Section 9 of the Regulation of Gatherings Act, but nevertheless use excessive force against peaceful protesters must be prosecuted”.

Then to quote,

There are further reports of intimidation, damage to property, violence, disruption and confrontation with security officers and we need the support of SAPS’s Public Order Policing to manage the situation.

In addition, we face a situation where we have been informed that several universities, including UCT, have been declared a level-three security situation by the national commissioner of SAPS, which, in effect, means that the Public Order Police are in command of the situation. We appeal to staff and students not to interfere with the work of members of SAPS and not to contribute to confrontations or any situation of conflict.

Like LazyLion said in the other thread, the police need to demonstrate their power above these criminals.
 
Basically means that they need to use more force as they are losing control?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X