Satellite myths busted

jes

MyBroadband Alumnus
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
11,992
Reaction score
123
Satellite myths busted

If there are any myths and misconceptions about satellites, then top of the list would be “satellites are a dying breed” and “satellites are expensive.”
 
Another misconception about satellites is the so-called latency problem...

No amount of magic features can hide the not-so-so-called latency of normal satellite type internet services. It all depends on what the connection will be used for. Anything realtime eg. Voip/Gaming will be affected no matter what. The only thing they can improve on is the effect of things like jitter on a voip conversation.

For normal browsing some people might not even feel this latency effect, but it will always be there.

This enables end customers to experience broadband internet browsing speeds, which are very similar to or better than that of most terrestrial access networks, such as digital subscriber line.

Better? Only when one is in the middle of freaking nowhere probably. The thing is your terrestrial access networks also use the same magic that is available to the vsat providers to improve overall browsing experience for the end user.
 
If there are any myths and misconceptions about satellites, then top of the list would be “satellites are a dying breed” and “satellites are expensive.”

Expensive compared to what? I suspect the only reason is Telkom's overpriced ADSL makes satellite figures look better.
 
If you still are not convinced, here is one for the record. MTN is about to launch its satellite hub at its 14th Avenue campus in May 2012.

How old is this article?!

No amount of magic features can hide the not-so-so-called latency of normal satellite type internet services. It all depends on what the connection will be used for. Anything realtime eg. Voip/Gaming will be affected no matter what. The only thing they can improve on is the effect of things like jitter on a voip conversation.

For normal browsing some people might not even feel this latency effect, but it will always be there.

+1 Sounds like wishful thinking on the author's part.
 
Configuration and hygiene (registry clean- up and settings, free memory) in terms of end users devices, such as a PC, tablet or smartphone, which directly influences consistency in throughput and aspects of page, response times or the need for buffering.

So scandisk will speed up your satellite internet connection? Whoooo
 
We had 4 sites running via vsat backbone - and the ping latency screwed things up horribly.

When we switched over to 3G, everything improved quite beautifully. And 3G was cheaper than vsat.
 
If you still are not convinced, here is one for the record. MTN is about to launch its satellite hub at its 14th Avenue campus in May 2012. They are already trialling various services.
2013, you mean ?

Anyways,

Give me an uncapped satellite link > 512Kbps for < R1000. Not happening. What does this prove? Satellite is expensive.
Give me a satellite link with latency < 500ms. Not happening. What does this prove? Communication via satellites (earth-orbiting) = high latency.
Choose satellite vs fibre when you can have all the benefits of fibre? Are you going to choose satellite? Not happening. What does this prove? Satellite is a dying breed (of internet communications, that is. GPS etc is another story)
 
Last edited:
Just another impossible dream by "hams" but they are entitled hold their view over a dying hobby/service.
 
Cheap compared to a leased line, sure, but that is about it.

what bull**** about latency, there is nothing you can do about it besides minimise and EXTRA latency with your equipment etc. VOIP and video are still going to get affected no matter what "magic" you try to make people believe.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X