No, german - BMWVVT, as in Toyota? Japanese then?
The car had minimal work done under motor plan. There were no signs of any underlying issues.Yes, when one buys a second hand car, they should get the full service history, and print out of all claims against the motor plan to spot any underlying issues. There are many more factors when it comes to second hand buying. What you've witnessed in this thread, and quoted, is just the tip of the iceberg.
Maybe in an old car, not with a new one. Engines have gotten a lot more complicated with additional components to improve consumption and get more performance from smaller engines.Dealers/manufacturers also do that to perpetuate the low mileage myth, and make people scared of cars over 100,000km. If all goes well - which is does, most of the time - there would be maybe R20,000 in maintenance on major parts - clutch, cam, waterpump, etc. - for the next 100,000km up till 200,000km.
I can't speak for budget cars, but with luxury cars, you can be guaranteed of a big ticket item between that period. Mercs pre 2000 were good for well over 200,000kms, but the ones that followed have started getting progressively earlier with expensive failures after 120,000.
A friend of mine had an Audi A3. Between 140,000 and 180,000 he spent approximately R50,000 on it.
I wouldn't say it was a lemon. As I mentioned above, this is the norm, not the exception. Doing research on the variable valve timing system, the most common time for it to fail is 150,000kms - 180,000kms so I was right in the expected window / lifetime.When buying second hand, we do everything it takes to make sure we're not getting a lemon. If we don't get a lemon - which we won't, most of the time - it is 100% true that a car with 100,000km and just out of plan, is the safest bet.
Your example only makes us aware that lemons do exist. It is unfortunate that you got one.
Of course there is always some risk going second hand, minimal if you ask me, if the homework is done.