Sentenced to life aged 12.

Shake&Bake

Party Liaison
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
22,258
Reaction score
1,882
Location
Cape Town
Jailed for helping to murder his friend's stepfather after being tried as an adult.

  • Paul Gingerich sentenced to 25-years for shooting a friend's stepfather
  • He was tried as an adult and is not due to be released until he is 37
  • Story is the subject of a gripping new documentary to be aired this week


With his floppy fringe and sweet, angelic face it is plain to see why his teachers described him as looking like Justin Bieber's cute younger brother.

But while most children his age spend their days laughing with friends with nothing more serious to consider than their latest homework assignment, Paul Henry Gingerich is enduring an entirely different reality.

In 2010, at the age of 12, Paul, from Enchanted Hills, Indiana, was sentenced to 25-years in prison for his part in shooting dead a friend's stepfather.

While his crime was undoubtedly terrible, what is perhaps equally shocking is that despite his age, Paul was tried as an adult and is now not due to be released until he is 37.

In Indiana, under extreme circumstances, children as young as 10 can be tried and sentenced in adult courts. However it is rare and Paul remains one of the youngest ever to be tried in this fashion.

Paul's life was turned upside down on a fateful day in April, 2010, when he went from an ordinary kid, who had never been in trouble for anything more serious than talking in class and not finishing his homework, to a killer.

Paul, an older boy called Colt Lundy and another 12-year-old called Chase Williams, had planned to run away together.

But the then 15-year-old Lundy had told the other boys that his stepfather Phil Danner, would never allow it, so they would have to kill him first.

Lundy handed Paul a loaded gun and the pair crept through a window into Danner's house where they sat in armchairs waiting for him to walk into the room.

The other younger boy Chase Williams had refused to go in and had remained outside the house.

In his original police confession Paul described what happened next: 'Phil turned the corner and then he (Colt) shot him. I freaked out and closed my eyes and turned around and shot', the Sunday Mirror reports.

The court documents say Paul told police he simply went along with his older friend and didn't believe his friend was serious about killing his stepfather.

But in 2010 Paul was sentenced to 25 years in prison, for conspiring to fatally shoot 49-year-old Danner.

In December last year, the Indiana Court of Appeals threw out Paul's guilty plea and sentence, saying a juvenile court judge rushed when he waived the case to adult court.

The appellate court ordered a new hearing to determine if Paul should be retried in a juvenile court.

However it is a massive gamble because if the court decides that Paul should be retried as an adult, for the more serious crime of murder, he could be sentenced to 65 years and remain incarcerated until the age of 77.

As things stand, Paul is due to spend the next three years in a juvenile facility before being transferred to Indiana's notoriously tough Adult prison system.

His attorney, Monica Foster, said: 'You really can't appreciate just how horrific the adult prison system is unless you've been there.

'For the last 30 years I've been in and out of the adult prison system in the State of Indiana and I wouldn't let my dog go there for a week, much less a 12-year-old kid.'

His harrowing story is the subject of a new documentary by filmmaker Zara Hayes which is due to be aired on Channel 4 later this week.

Paul's mother Nicole said: 'I'm in disbelief with the whole thing.

'Surely if you had an adult male or female who had the brain capacity of a 12-year-old, they would not be tried as an adult.'

By all reports Paul has been a model prisoner. He attends school inside the juvenile prison five days a week, where he works hard in the hope that achieving good grades will mean the chance of a good job when he is released.

His teachers describe him as a role model and one of the best behaved children in the institution.

His father Paul Senior, said: 'I never wanted him to get off scot free. He did commit a crime and I don't want people to see him as a victim because Phil Danner was the victim in this case.

'But you can't throw a child in with adults and expect him not to get screwed up.'

Paul is now a long way from the floppy-haired 12-year-old who made that terrible decision three years ago.

Now sporting a crew cut, his grey eyes appear to have lost much of their innocence. Prison has hardened him.

But incredibly he says he is grateful for what he has,.

He says: 'I believe I have matured faster than other kids my age.

'I'm starting to think before I act more and not be so impulsive. Now I'm more grateful for what I have.

article-2107489-11F229BD000005DC-341_306x423.jpg


article-2316034-198605A7000005DC-873_634x428.jpg


article-2316034-198608FF000005DC-879_634x501.jpg

Source

I'd actually be keen to see this story on the air.
 
good...at the age of 12, you know right from wrong.

That's kinda pointless if your not fully emotionally developed and can't fully comprehend consequences. When we're young there's lot of things we're told that are right and wrong, we find out later in our lives that were complete BS or a grey area stemming from culture/religion or a lack there-off.

Why would he want to run away in the first place?
 
What a tragedy.
This boy was let down by his father, his family, and his society. Shame on them. Shame on us all for our own neglects and failures.
 
What a tragedy.
This boy was let down by his father, his family, and his society. Shame on them. Shame on us all for our own neglects and failures.

I fully agree with the first part of your post. The self-flagellation seems a bit overkill, however.

It's always disheartening to see the law fail those who need it most.
 
I fully agree with the first part of your post. The self-flagellation seems a bit overkill, however.

It's always disheartening to see the law fail those who need it most.
Not self-flaggelation, just a knowledge that criticizing others for their failures also raises the question of my own. No human tragedy happens alone, and in some or other way we are all implicated because we are all related. This is a family failure.
 
good...at the age of 12, you know right from wrong.

I agree,lock him up.
The is no excuse for this type of behavior.No one let this boy down, he let himself down. We all went through that age and did mischievous thing, But you knew killing someone was a bad idea. Lock him up
 
Not self-flaggelation, just a knowledge that criticizing others for their failures also raises the question of my own. No human tragedy happens alone, and in some or other way we are all implicated because we are all related. This is a family failure.
Arthur, you should not smoke that stuff. We had nothing to do with this boy's failures
 
I agree,lock him up.
The is no excuse for this type of behavior.No one let this boy down, he let himself down. We all went through that age and did mischievous thing, But you knew killing someone was a bad idea. Lock him up

thank you. people are forgetting that he committed murder. i think at worst he's a victim of peer pressure. and what others are saying about family and society let him down. i do agree with that to a point, cause he knew this was happening and he couldn't turn to anyone to tell them before hand.

Or he's just psychotic. Just sayin.
 
What happened is a terrible but he is still young enough to learn from his mistake. I don't see the point of locking him up and throwing away the key. How will there be any reabilitation for him if he is put in the adult prison population where he will most probably be abused.
 
I agree,lock him up.
The is no excuse for this type of behavior.No one let this boy down, he let himself down. We all went through that age and did mischievous thing, But you knew killing someone was a bad idea. Lock him up
No-one suggests he should be let off scot-free, but it is simply ridiculous on the one hand to claim that 12 year olds are not, say, old enough to drink, buy guns, vote, sign contracts and so on, but to then turn around and claim they should be tried as adults. Should parents even be considered still responsible for supporting a 12 year old? Shouldn't they be out working?
 
No way you can treat a 12yr old like a adult. But this is the USA where vengeance at times seem more important than justice. The same country where abused & battered woman that fight back after finally snapping get get zero leniency.
 
Let's just hope that upon release, he doesn't end up BACK in there.

If anything he will learn more about crime and come out more fscked up than when he went in. He won't last long outside.
 
No way you can treat a 12yr old like a adult. But this is the USA where vengeance at times seem more important than justice. The same country where abused & battered woman that fight back after finally snapping get get zero leniency.

and yet there were women that do get off scot free..battered wife syndrome. it's up to how good the lawyer is.

Here in South Africa, does the home owner get off scot free for defending his home from burglars. do the cops get off scot free if they shot a criminal? not all the time......
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X