"Sex with dead deer not illegal"

alanf85 said:
Hmm everything has gone scambled. Damn I knew their would be trouble with overloading. Maybe if a press *restart*

Being a little hypocritical aren't you. I can the say same to you.

i chose to tolerate you rather than place you on my ignore list even though you have chosen to be intolerant about the views of others

Yes I can. If I moved in next door you would have to tolerate my loud music. :p
Click to expand...
nope nope nope - seems someone has disconnected the power supply...

can you by moving in next door force me to tolerate your loud (and no doubt exceedingly crap) music? no - you may force me to take drastic action like moving again / calling the cops / slitting your throat in the dead of night but by the very doing of any of those actions i would be demonstrating that you cannot force me to tolerate it

quod est demonstrat
 
alanf just keeps coming back for more :eek: sadomasochism knows no bounds.
 
alanf85 said:
How do you know my music is crap. List some bands and I'll see if I listen to any of them and if I do then I'll expect an apology.

Why must you move? You were there first . Just because "in this example ;) " I'm an @$$ you must move even though you behave yourself "in this example".

Haha what are the cops gonna do.

Oh so you gonna kill me and the go to jail for the rest of your life. You wouldn't honestly do that would you. I'll tell you what you would do, you would sit there and tolerate it. Just like I do with my neighbours.

So you see in theory you may be correct but in reality I'm afraid not.
Click to expand...
sounds suspiciously like a concession at the end there :p
 
alanf85 said:
I have said this before on this forum. In theory a lot of what "lefties" say is fine but when it comes down to reality it just doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Got to laugh :D The boy is determined if nothing else.

Um, american elections anyone?! :p
 
simple_simon said:
well if your perception of a night out on the town, involves killing and then fornicating with the local wildlife....i can safely say something has gone horribly wrong somewhere in your life.
Click to expand...

Fortunately I was referring to his perception not mine! Managed to stay away from the wildlife so far, both dead and alive. :p
 
alanf85 said:
Please.

What a weak argument. You could argue that for a hundred and one things. Unluck you I think "shagging a dead animal" is incredibly sick and very worthy of the time and effort to throw the perpetrator in jail.

So just because you have some extreme paranoid fear that a few people would want to impose that on you, you'll be willing to have sickos roaming about.

Until they do it to an innocent person. Can you not grasp that for someone to have sex with a dead animal there must be something very wrong with them. I hate to think what other shocking sick things you want to force people to tolerate.

Just look at the state of "liberal Democracies". They are a mess. If the price for tolerating this kind of thing is a sick, savage society then I'm not willing to support it. I wont accept the "live an let live" philosophy when it comes down sick ticking time bombs like this guy. If you're happy living with depraved people like this that's fine but I wont. I prefer to live amongst people who at least civil, respectable and decent.

A stable civil society must be based on sound moral laws. That's why it's called civilisation.
Click to expand...

Great argument. Worked for the Nazis (1936 Nuremberg laws).

However, I choose liberty (liberalism) over totalitarianism.
 
alanf85 said:
I suppose that's a compliment.

I'll take that as one as well.

Don't go all soft now. :(


I heard Charvez, Bin laden, Ahmadinejad and various other tyrants, terrorits, criminals and sickos are overjoyed. I'm now waiting for the "peace in our time" speech from that moonbat Nancy Pelosi. :p
Click to expand...

Chambelain 1938 on annexure of Sudetenland? My history is a little rusty. Funny thing I want to point out is that it is usually only with hindsight that we can distinguish between 'appeasement' and 'negotiation'.
 
Lol, ok, i am busted for bringing up hitler.

however it does not make what i say any less true.

dominic expanded on what the implication of tolerance is - it is really the only practical alternative we have to full blown totalitarianism...however alanf does not see it this way. i give up! :)
 
Alan seems to be in favour of a police state under his rule, he'll never see it any other way. He still hasn't answered my question about who decides what is acceptable :rolleyes:
 
Seriously some people are truly scary. Its actually beginning to depress me to read these forums. All these closed minded fascists who think they know whats best for everyone else and what we should be allowed or not allowed to do.

"Do what you want as long as it doesn't affect others." seems like such a logical ideal. You can base an entire legal system on just that one thought.

Problem is there will always be those who can't mind there own business. They seem to spend an unhealthy amount of time contemplating how the actions of others may somehow be affecting them or how one action of an individual may show a tendency towards other activities that may harm others.

What people like alan really believe is that their way of life is better or more valid than others. They don't give a **** about freedom because in their ideal society all their morals and beliefs would be enforced. In other words they believe that only they and those who share their principles should have freedom.

If you give people with his mind set free reign to decide what sexual practices are acceptable or not, don't be shocked to find out that he believes that the missionary position for the purposes of procreation are the only acceptable practices.

****ing a dead animal is pretty unusual by most peoples standards I'm sure, but hey I'm pretty sure the dead deer didn't mind because...um well it was dead. And look if this guy was ****ing said deer in public, were he could be seen by children or anyone else for that matter, then by all means lock him up for public indecency.
 
alanf85 said:
Oh yes, any chance of seeing that post again Debbie2.

I got a another "what if" scenario.

I family of three. Mother,father and their only child.
What if the mother had died in hospital leaving the father to raise the child. If the child then also passed away during the night would he then be free to have intercourse with the now dead child in the privacy of his own home. Will it be allowed because his morals allow him and what he did does not directly affect anybody around him.

Just to find out how far your depravity goes.
Click to expand...

Oooh a really tough little moral dilema you've painted here. The inside of your head must be such an entertaining place.

Ok are we to assume that you afford the same dignity to a child as you do to an animal? As humans we treat our dead with respect, that includes the corpses of our dead. I don't feel the need to equate the body of a dead child with that of a dead animal, in fact I find it a bit sick to do so, but hey I guess I have to tolerate your twisted world view.

Seriously though, you do realise that your same argument could be used to suggest that if its ok to eat dead animals then it must be ok to eat dead children?
 
alanf85 said:
Whao that's the third one. :eek:

I must be getting somewhere.






Why don't you just answer the question.

It's very desturbing trying to understand your mindset.:sick:
Click to expand...

I'll paraphrase for the less intelligent among us. I don't give a **** what you do to the body of a dead animal. I do care what we do to the bodies of dead human beings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X