Sounds good to me.
And when factories close and businesses collapse and all capital leaves SA, as we enter anarchy and civil war, you can pat yourself on the back.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Sounds good to me.
Suits me. I'm paying.Well then we might as well put everyone who does not have a TV licence in jail as well.
Do you wait for your child to break the tv before you punish him or do you start when he is throwing around the remote?It seems like selective justice. I see worse violations on a daily basis (reckless turning, extreme speeding, pushing into traffic, offloading in the centre of the road) and no-one even gives these clowns a fine. To be fair they should start with worse offenses and go on down, rather than the opposite. Guess striking taxi drivers blocking traffic or taxi drivers stopping carpool cars are OK.
I heard this type of action would be illegal in say the States, selective law enforcement is not correct.
Suits me. I'm paying.
Do you wait for your child to break the tv before you punish him or do you start when he is throwing around the remote?
Like the Afrikaans people say: Dis die klein jakkalsies wat die wingerd verwoes.
Start enforcing the law with the small things and the principal will be there. Not wait until the dude runs over the guy stuck in the yellow line because of a break down and then want to punish him.
And when factories close and businesses collapse and all capital leaves SA, as we enter anarchy and civil war, you can pat yourself on the back.![]()
Punishment is fair if everyone is treated the SAME WAY! Not let hundreds of criminals get away but then punish some idiots in JHB!
Well I hope that you don't mind if you cross over a yellow line or caught speeding to immediately get thrown into jail with murderers.
As you put it, the law is the law and breaking any law deservers the same punishment!
When I was at school the fear of "6 of the best" worked well. I didnt go to a fancy school and mainly consisted of kids from middle to lower-middle class families
It seems like selective justice. I see worse violations on a daily basis (reckless turning, extreme speeding, pushing into traffic, offloading in the centre of the road) and no-one even gives these clowns a fine. To be fair they should start with worse offenses and go on down, rather than the opposite. Guess striking taxi drivers blocking traffic or taxi drivers stopping carpool cars are OK.
I heard this type of action would be illegal in say the States, selective law enforcement is not correct.
Yes true but it will make you think before you do it again.The road I live in is a residential road, but people use it daily as a thoroughfare to get to work, irritates the **** out of me and my wife, not to mention the arrogant sob's that don’t feel like waiting in the long queue down my road, so they drive all the way up the road on the wrong side of the road. I mean it is crazy. 90% of these idiots are obviously taxi drivers who have no consideration what so ever.
This morning there were to my surprise 3 metro cops waiting on the corner and pulling these idiots over. Was nice to see them actually do something. Problem is they probably wont be back for another 2 months.
I agree PeterCH, locking people up for minor offences is ridiculous. Amazing to think that every other poster in this thread has never broken any law, ever. I think their tunes would change if it was them being locked up for a day for some minor infringement. Like you say PeterCH, the law must be applied fairly, and as long as murderers are set free, there is no reason to selectively target otherwise honest hardworking individuals in a PR stunt designed to "make an example of them". I would have my attorneys draughting a wrongful arrest / abuse of power claim the minute I was released, if I ever found myself in this situation.
As to WHY people were driving in that lane: as usual government is incapable of designing a road suitable for the expected traffic volumes. Why arrest motorists when the simpler, fairer and more sensible solution is to adjust the road markings to make what these "heinous criminals" were doing legal. But obviously the rest of you would rather see people turned into criminals for your own amusement than suggest a reasonable solution to the problem. What's next, convert a stadium to a roman amphitheatre and feed people to the lions for speeding. Real mature.[/QUOTE]
1. Is it only a big offence when someone is killed? Like speeding nothing wrong with it until someone innocent is killed?
2. How is it wrongful to be arrested for breaking the law?
3. You do know that the engineers is the guys at Africon not the government?
4. You tell me it’s my amusement? The same way your solution is to blame everybody else but you for breaking the law is your amusement.
5. Yes i am a matter of fact. I loathe people like you that complain that the government doesn’t do anything and when they do you complain about it too.
And as a matter of fact i have not broken any laws. And doe s that make me a bad person???
Yes true but it will make you think before you do it again.
I agree PeterCH, locking people up for minor offences is ridiculous. Amazing to think that every other poster in this thread has never broken any law, ever. I think their tunes would change if it was them being locked up for a day for some minor infringement. Like you say PeterCH, the law must be applied fairly, and as long as murderers are set free, there is no reason to selectively target otherwise honest hardworking individuals in a PR stunt designed to "make an example of them". I would have my attorneys draughting a wrongful arrest / abuse of power claim the minute I was released, if I ever found myself in this situation.
As to WHY people were driving in that lane: as usual government is incapable of designing a road suitable for the expected traffic volumes. Why arrest motorists when the simpler, fairer and more sensible solution is to adjust the road markings to make what these "heinous criminals" were doing legal. But obviously the rest of you would rather see people turned into criminals for your own amusement than suggest a reasonable solution to the problem. What's next, convert a stadium to a roman amphitheatre and feed people to the lions for speeding. Real mature.[/QUOTE]
1. Is it only a big offence when someone is killed? Like speeding nothing wrong with it until someone innocent is killed?
2. How is it wrongful to be arrested for breaking the law?
3. You do know that the engineers is the guys at Africon not the government?
4. You tell me it’s my amusement? The same way your solution is to blame everybody else but you for breaking the law is your amusement.
5. Yes i am a matter of fact. I loathe people like you that complain that the government doesn’t do anything and when they do you complain about it too.
And as a matter of fact i have not broken any laws. And doe s that make me a bad person???
1. Are you honestly suggesting that this is an offence that should be punished with jail time? FYI, the amount an offence annoys you is not the determining factor here.
2. There are guidelines for arresting people, when those guidelines are ignored the arrest is illegal.
3. I have built a few roads in my day, so yes, I know how the process works. I also know that the client (government, in this case) is responsible for specifying their requirements. As anyone who has ever built a wendy hut will tell you, an engineer's design is only as good as the clients specification.
4. You giggled gleefully upon hearing that people were subjected to conditions I wouldn't subject my dog to. What does that say about you?
5. I will continue to complain that government chooses to target "soft targets with fixed addresses" rather than using the few competent enforcement officials they have for more serious work. Like catching murderers and rapists, for example.
Well done for never breaking any law ever, quite an achievement, one could even say an unbelievable achievement. What I mean to say is: I don't believe you.
It seems like selective justice. I see worse violations on a daily basis (reckless turning, extreme speeding, pushing into traffic, offloading in the centre of the road) and no-one even gives these clowns a fine. To be fair they should start with worse offenses and go on down, rather than the opposite. Guess striking taxi drivers blocking traffic or taxi drivers stopping carpool cars are OK.
I heard this type of action would be illegal in say the States, selective law enforcement is not correct.
Yes i do but if everybody stopped doing the little things the police would have more time for the high jackers. So if you are scared of going to jail it will stop you from doing the little things. It's the same logic people apply to the death penalty.
My biggest problem with people today is that they thing that saying sorry makes everything better. Something’s has got to have bigger repercussions than just paying a fine and saying sorry.
I am 100% behind corporal punishment. Take 6 on the ass and remember, now we can’t do it like that so be afraid of the place they are sending you too. We should start making posters
o the size of your A hole if you abide the traffic laws'
0 the size if you do not and end up in jail.
You are a ****ing idiot....
You are a ****ing idiot....
"Well if you know that you can end up being raped you will stop doing illeagal things. Just my opinion."
Yes true but it will make you think before you do it again.
1. Are you honestly suggesting that this is an offence that should be punished with jail time? FYI, the amount an offence annoys you is not the determining factor here.
2. There are guidelines for arresting people, when those guidelines are ignored the arrest is illegal.
3. I have built a few roads in my day, so yes, I know how the process works. I also know that the client (government, in this case) is responsible for specifying their requirements. As anyone who has ever built a wendy hut will tell you, an engineer's design is only as good as the clients specification.
4. You giggled gleefully upon hearing that people were subjected to conditions I wouldn't subject my dog to. What does that say about you?
5. I will continue to complain that government chooses to target "soft targets with fixed addresses" rather than using the few competent enforcement officials they have for more serious work. Like catching murderers and rapists, for example.
Well done for never breaking any law ever, quite an achievement, one could even say an unbelievable achievement. What I mean to say is: I don't believe you.
I do not care if you believe me or not? I will not sleep in jail. And that is why i abide by the law, not too please you.
But yo do make good points and i agree with some o the things you are saying.
If you know the law and where i could read it i would greatly appreciate .
( the one about detaining the person breaking the law. Is it not up to the police man to decide if he can take you to the holding cell? Just asking. Would like to read the law.)
About 3. Oke i get what you are saying. Still there is not always the space to build the roads to our liking. See England and America traffic is not a third world problem.
I say we in this country has gotten away with driving as we please for too long. We should be happy about things like this.
I stick too my point. Is it only a offence when someone gets hurt?
About 4. I also applaude the police for shooting high jackers and criminals.
About 5. I agree with you but the metro police is for traffic not for rapists.
And about a fixed address? They were in their cars.
I will share of my thoughts
The cells these people are in are for innocent people, they were kept without/awaiting trial. So should they be raped ? Is that the Africa you want to live in.
I'm all for punished guilty people, but the police are not the custodians of the law. they are mealy a tool the justice system use's to bring people to task.
I just think you initial response was immature and out of line, I not really here to debate the point. You now know my opinion of you. weather you care or not.