My_King
Honorary Master
Other
As long as it does not affect others, no comment
As long as it does not affect others, no comment
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Will you be subscribing to the new Disney+ R49 streaming package?
Should vaping be treated as smoking?
- Thread starter bwana
- Start date
Danny_Sohota
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2026
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
This is one of those debates where nuance really matters. Vaping and smoking aren’t the same thing—but that doesn’t automatically make one “safe” either.
From what current evidence suggests, the biggest difference is combustion. Traditional cigarettes burn tobacco, producing tar and thousands of toxic chemicals, which is why smoking is linked to serious diseases like cancer and heart problems. Vaping, on the other hand, heats a liquid instead of burning it, which generally exposes users to fewer harmful substances.
That said, vaping still isn’t risk-free. There are studies pointing to potential lung and cardiovascular effects, and the long-term impact is still being researched.
So should it be treated the same as smoking?
In public spaces, I can understand why many places group them together—mainly for simplicity, social comfort, and to avoid confusion. Not everyone wants to inhale anything second-hand, regardless of whether it’s smoke or vapour.
From a harm perspective, though, most public health discussions treat vaping as a harm-reduction alternative for smokers, not an equivalent habit. Many smokers have used it as a stepping stone away from cigarettes.
In short:
At Vapeaah, we usually see vaping as a tool for adult smokers trying to move away from cigarettes, not something for non-smokers to pick up casually.
Curious to hear what others think—should policy focus more on harm reduction or strict regulation
From what current evidence suggests, the biggest difference is combustion. Traditional cigarettes burn tobacco, producing tar and thousands of toxic chemicals, which is why smoking is linked to serious diseases like cancer and heart problems. Vaping, on the other hand, heats a liquid instead of burning it, which generally exposes users to fewer harmful substances.
That said, vaping still isn’t risk-free. There are studies pointing to potential lung and cardiovascular effects, and the long-term impact is still being researched.
So should it be treated the same as smoking?
In public spaces, I can understand why many places group them together—mainly for simplicity, social comfort, and to avoid confusion. Not everyone wants to inhale anything second-hand, regardless of whether it’s smoke or vapour. From a harm perspective, though, most public health discussions treat vaping as a harm-reduction alternative for smokers, not an equivalent habit. Many smokers have used it as a stepping stone away from cigarettes.In short:
- Same?
Not really - Harmless? Definitely not
- Better than smoking (for existing smokers)?
Generally yes
At Vapeaah, we usually see vaping as a tool for adult smokers trying to move away from cigarettes, not something for non-smokers to pick up casually.
Curious to hear what others think—should policy focus more on harm reduction or strict regulation
Jean Claude Vaaldamme
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2020
- Messages
- 10,569
- Reaction score
- 11,466
Firstly why do you use the word usaully?
Secondly why do you sell all these fancy flavours in your shop and all the fancy colour vapes/pods/disposibles?
That says you trying to lure in the the young non smokers.
So stop talking BS