Smokers in racist attack on bus

@both of u
All that jumping to conclusions must be making you very tired.

I said it "made matters worse", nothing else. Have u ever taken a bus? I guess not!
Talk about jumping to conclusions - of course I have.

. . . you also jumped to the conclusion that the bus driver was aggressive - nice assumption there. Regardless of your presumption of his attitude it is no justification for being assaulted.

BTW - since when are bus drivers bureaucrats - petty or otherwise? :confused:
 
Talk about jumping to conclusions - of course I have.

. . . you also jumped to the conclusion that the bus driver was aggressive - nice assumption there. Regardless of your presumption of his attitude it is no justification for being assaulted.

BTW - since when are bus drivers bureaucrats - petty or otherwise? :confused:
He's an official and the bus is his office. He manages customers, money and the driving. Close enough.

They enjoy the power to chuck people off or mess them around. I've taken more bus rides than you've had hot dinners, so I feel I can comment with some confidence ;) . They are all the same. (Coach drivers ... a different animal ...)
 
What's the world coming to if you can't even have a quiet ciggie anymore?

Oh, it was on a bus? Even better. ;)
 
He's an official and the bus is his office. He manages customers, money and the driving. Close enough.

They enjoy the power to chuck people off or mess them around. I've taken more bus rides than you've had hot dinners, so I feel I can comment with some confidence ;) . They are all the same. (Coach drivers ... a different animal ...)
you must take a taxi and try lighting up a ciggie there. You'd get sjamboked so bad you'd curse the day you took up smoking.

The buses are clearly labelled no smoking. Rook verbode. Akubhenywa. It even has a no smoking sign for those that are either dislexic or illeterate

Anyone lighting up a cigarette in the bus is not only disrespecting the driver but his fellow passengers as well. As a result they must be thrown out of the bus so that they can smoke all they want whilst walking to their destination.
 
Last edited:
He's an official and the bus is his office. He manages customers, money and the driving. Close enough.

They enjoy the power to chuck people off or mess them around. I've taken more bus rides than you've had hot dinners, so I feel I can comment with some confidence ;) . They are all the same. (Coach drivers ... a different animal ...)
I think I've taken enough bus rides in enough places to also be able to confidently comment - perhaps it is your demeanour as I've generally found them to be pleasant even though they're doing a thankless task. ;)

How would you count all the hot dinners I've had while on a bus? :confused: You might want to find a more scientific measuring stick than that. :)
 
Last edited:
you must take a taxi and try lighting up a ciggie there. You'd get sjamboked so bad you'd curse the day you took up smoking.

The buses are clearly labelled no smoking. Rook verbode. Akubhenywa. It even has a no smoking sign for those that are either dislexic or illeterate

Anyone lighting up a cigarette in the bus is not only disrespecting the driver but his fellow passengers as well. As a result they must be thrown out of the bus so that they can smoke all they want whilst walking to their destination.

Aside from that its illegal too isn't it?
 
Too easy.
Didn't work then, why will it work now?
I say let the fukcers walk to school and back.

And the current punishment methods do work? c'mon corporal punishment sure as h3ll worked, I can still remember many of the times I was standing in front of the principles office waiting to get six of the best, seriously considering just why I had done whatever caused me to stand there.

Todays punishment is nothing more than a few days off, I would probably have done my best to get a few days off every month.
 
I hate smoking (anywhere) but I can't help feeling these aggressive bus drivers make matters worse. (petty bureaucrats)

Read the story the driver was everything but aggressive, he had asked them on previous occasions to stop, they had also agreed to stop, when they again smoked on his bus after agreeing to stop, he first radioed his supervisor before asking them to get off at the next stop.

he did nothing aggressive.
 
Like what give them a few days off to thin about what they've done?, cool a holiday at home where you can smoke to your hearts content.

I'm not sure but do you really think violence is the answer?
 
I think a caning used to do a world of good, I'd always think about the k@k i was about to pull and if it'd get me in to lots of trouble and have any canings attached..

when they did away with it, and just had detention and whatnot.. i stopped caring.
 
c'mon corporal punishment sure as h3ll worked, I can still remember many of the times I was standing in front of the principles office waiting to get six of the best,
Your reasoning does not follow!
If the punishment had been such a big deterrent as you say, you would not be standing in front of the principle's office many times
:cool: :cool:
 
They should not be smoking in uniform in the first place,hope the school know about this incident, so they can be dealt with,accordingly, maybe not expelled,but suspend the devils.
 
bear in mind all 'corporal punishment' and 'caning' tends to do, is
create psycho-sexual perverts, who get off on being 'punished'..

do some Googling on 'corporal punishment' and 'sexual fetish'

here to start you off:
What Causes Spanking Fetishes? A Testable Model
http://www.nospank.net/dugan2.htm
"One way for a child to cope with unintegratable trauma is to eroticize it. This can give the child a safe outlet for the dammed-up energy of the repressed emotions, and temporary relief from the continual task of repression. I am convinced that some (but not all) spanking fetishes, are eroticizations of childhood traumas."
Spanking Fetishes
http://www.smartspanking.com/fetishism.html
more at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=corporal+punishment+causes+sexual+fetish&btnG=Google+Search

So yeah, I know what you folks arguing for a good caning, and who vehemently talk about
how 'it did you good' (ahem).. get up to in your bedrooms, you sicko's :)
 
Last edited:
bear in mind all 'corporal punishment' and 'caning' tends to do, is
create psycho-sexual perverts, who get off on being 'punished'..

do some Googling on 'corporal punishment' and 'sexual fetish'

here to start you off:
What Causes Spanking Fetishes? A Testable Model
http://www.nospank.net/dugan2.htm
"One way for a child to cope with unintegratable trauma is to eroticize it. This can give the child a safe outlet for the dammed-up energy of the repressed emotions, and temporary relief from the continual task of repression. I am convinced that some (but not all) spanking fetishes, are eroticizations of childhood traumas."
Spanking Fetishes
http://www.smartspanking.com/fetishism.html
more at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=corporal+punishment+causes+sexual+fetish&btnG=Google+Search

So yeah, I know what you folks arguing for a good caning, and who vehemently talk about
how 'it did you good' (ahem).. get up to in your bedrooms, you sicko's :)

Bwhahahahahahaha :D :D :D

Oh my, spanking turns a person into a sexual pervert :o . Another classic from LG. I know plenty of people who got canned and they're no where close to being perverts :rolleyes: .

I gotta get some of the pills you're popping because I'm obviously not strung out enough to understand your point of view ;)
 
bear in mind all 'corporal punishment' and 'caning' tends to do, is
create psycho-sexual perverts, who get off on being 'punished'..

do some Googling on 'corporal punishment' and 'sexual fetish'

here to start you off:
What Causes Spanking Fetishes? A Testable Model
http://www.nospank.net/dugan2.htm
"One way for a child to cope with unintegratable trauma is to eroticize it. This can give the child a safe outlet for the dammed-up energy of the repressed emotions, and temporary relief from the continual task of repression. I am convinced that some (but not all) spanking fetishes, are eroticizations of childhood traumas."
Spanking Fetishes
http://www.smartspanking.com/fetishism.html
more at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=corporal+punishment+causes+sexual+fetish&btnG=Google+Search

So yeah, I know what you folks arguing for a good caning, and who vehemently talk about
how 'it did you good' (ahem).. get up to in your bedrooms, you sicko's :)
I was, on occasion, canned at school and trust me there was nothing pleasurable about it. However, if your research allows you to better understand aspects of your own psyche then more power to you.
 
When I was at school corporal punishment was still used. And it worked. Fights between children were few in number. Classes were not disrupted by a few IQ-challenged idiots, and the children wanting to learn could do so in a safe environment. I can remember only two hidings I got at school. Both of them I deserved. One of those canings was because of a math test I failed, it changed my attitude and years later I was awarded a Master of Science degree Cum Laude. I have no caning fetishes and I have no permanent scars because of corporal punishment. This type of attack would never have happened back then (Yes, some of our busdrivers where also black). It is easy to see which system worked.......
 
The people advocating corporal punishment assume everything else can be held as equal which it clearly can't, there have been numerous other changes in society since the time corporal punishment was used, you can't attribute all the change to that.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X