South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
BroadbandStarved said:ICASA needs to pull their fingers out of their bottoms and force Telkom (and now SNO) to provide broadband without charging line rental, (like they do all over the world except here). This alone will have a significant effect on affordability and before you know it, the big guns of ITC world will be toast their successes and the south african public will be enjoying wide scale use of broadband.
Nickste said:I believe the SNO's involvement in the EASSy cable is going to be a big winner for them. While we'll still have to use Telkom's lines, we will be able to hop onto a SNO backed ISP and reap the rewards of cheaper bandwidth (higher caps, maybe better contention ratios, etc.). This, however, will only come into effect in mid to late 2007
Cheers, Nick
youradsl said:This should be obvious from what I said - I'll move to the SNO even if they only have a service equal to that of Telkom’s, just because I don’t like Telkom - if their service is not up to par I wont move.
I hope you understand this one - it shouldn’t be too hard.
feo said:So how exactly does the SNO tie in with EASSy? And how is EASSy gonna benefit SA?
If you took that as a insult I wont say anything else. Seems like you have a personality complex.Tomasz-London said:Great thinking, you are getting **** service from Telkom and are willing to move to a different company offering thesame **** service. Why bother?
Never mind, answer not required.
Telkom will have to drop the line rental - otherwise SNO providing service on back of telkom... and telkom makes tons on SNO business. Not right - can't happen.I don't see Telkom dropping their line rental too much anytime soon, however, with the introduction of the SNO and EASSy, competition is going to be fierce between ISP's. We probably won't see a big cost cut, but rather, more bang for our buck