so... this is fixed?

getting really close to it... getting a blistering 2.78kbps!

"fixed" my ass!

<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><i><div align="right"><font color="red">i haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...</font id="red">
tower82.randparkridge.jhb|13% signal|256k package</div id="right"></i></font id="size1">
 
Resolving host 'www.sentech.co.za'
Pinging [66.18.65.115] x 10 with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=257 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=253 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=260 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=300 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=902 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=115 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=799 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=362 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=119 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=278 ms
Min=115 : Max=902 : Ave=364 ms : Packetloss = 0%

Resolving host 'www.sentech.co.za'
Pinging [66.18.65.115] x 10 with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=431 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=260 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=920 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=1060 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=1118 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=2316 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=119 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=519 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=137 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=180 ms
Min=119 : Max=2316 : Ave=706 ms : Packetloss = 0%

/cry

35% Signal
[36]Scummyside
 
mm ... Well Kemo you poor poor boy.. this is what I get at DBN:

Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=146 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=113 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=122 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=106 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=92 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=95 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=107 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=89 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=299 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=101 ms
Min=89 : Max=299 : Ave=127 ms : Packetloss = 0%

What can I say.. it looks sweetish...
Regards
Cerberus
 
Pinging www.sentech.co.za [66.18.65.115] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=487ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=251

Ping statistics for 66.18.65.115:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 487ms, Average = 259ms


Pinging www.sentech.co.za [66.18.65.115] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=1155ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=519ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=251
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=251

Ping statistics for 66.18.65.115:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 1155ms, Average = 297ms

HA! I win! wait... er...

crap!


<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><i><div align="right"><font color="red">i haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...</font id="red">
tower82.randparkridge.jhb|13% signal|256k package</div id="right"></i></font id="size1">
 
Resolving host 'www.sentech.co.za'
Pinging [66.18.65.115] x 4 with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=83 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=99 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=96 ms
Reply from 66.18.65.115 : bytes=32 : time=93 ms
Min=83 : Max=99 : Ave=92 ms : Packetloss = 0%

<font color="blue">Bay of Plenty: </font id="blue"><font size="1"><font color="black"> Signal 46% - SNL 17 - ber 71%
</font id="size1"></font id="black">
 
I'm wondering if they deem this service as a fair service? I need to get out of this contract....my head is constantly hurting, im loosign even more hair now, and my GF thinks im becoming a satanist, cause im sitting in the dark starign at the modem....




35% Signal
[36]Scummyside
 
Ok if the Difference is so extremely HUGE between 2 towers, in Durban and Pretoria(Sunnyside)...what did they do wrong to our tower then?

And if the contention ratio can influence ping times.../shrug

35% Signal
[36]Scummyside
 
something is wrong here... i was getting downloads between 12 and 17k a second last night in the wee hours of the morning... but before 11 it was CRAP!

and what happens is that it starts off allright, and then gradually dies down to nothing...

something's definately amuck with these towers. both 82 and 12...

fix the bloody things you a-holes!!! (just in case Me. Potgieter is reading this)

<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><i><div align="right"><font color="red">i haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...</font id="red">
tower82.randparkridge.jhb|13% signal|256k package</div id="right"></i></font id="size1">
 
From: MyWireless Support &lt;[email protected]&gt;
To: &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt;
Subject: Re: Ref 4362 (Was: International Connectivity Issues)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:25:20 +0200

Good day &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt;
To be quit honest we have a solution for the speed problem. We just need a way of implementing it at this moment. We have not forgotten about you because you are a valued customer. We just need a bit of time to work out the implementations. Thank you for understanding and please stay in contact.

Regards Tommy
Sentech Support

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:45:20 +0200 &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt; wrote:
&gt; Hi Support,
&gt;
&gt; New day... same questions...
&gt; - from my tests the speed issue has not been resolved.
&gt; - do you have any estimate as to when it will be resolved?
 
ja... I hear what you are saying. am I the only still having problems then? Are they applying the fix one subscriber at a time?


From: MyWireless Support &lt;[email protected]&gt;
To: &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt;
Subject: Re: Ref 4362 (Was: International Connectivity Issues)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:06:17 +0200
Good day &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt;
Technical support is still working on the problem and the solution would be implemented once it has been finalised and you would be notified of the solution
Kind Regards
Sipho
Sentech Support
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:15:48 +0200 &lt;&lt;&lt;privet&gt;&gt;&gt; wrote:
&gt; Hi Support,
&gt;
&gt; Thanks for the assurance that the problem is still getting
&gt; attention. I have been waiting very patiently for you to
&gt; fix this. From other emails you stated that it would have
&gt; been fixed last week Friday. Clearly this did not happen...
&gt; I am getting to a point where:
&gt; - surely you can tell me exactly what the problem is
&gt; - surely you can tell me exactly what the solution is
&gt; - surely you can tell me more or less when the solution
&gt; will be implemented.
 
So here is the Million Dollar Question, once again...Is it Fixed?

How stable = Download Speeds?
How Stable = Ping Times?
How Stable = Packet Loss?

I havent been able to test for a while and would like to know if it is worthit once I get home...

Specially the infamous Sunnyside Tower...

35% Signal
[36]Scummyside
 
I can tell you that Sunnyside is seeing its 4ss again. Things were cool from 17:00 Friday until about 18:00 Sunday. Thereafter its the same old jumpy speeds and slow responsiveness. Why cant they just leave it alone when its working?
 
'cos that would mean happy customers - and HEAVEN forbid that!!! :/

<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><i><div align="right"><font color="red">i haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...</font id="red">
tower82.randparkridge.jhb|13% signal|256k package</div id="right"></i></font id="size1">
 
yep. you can take that as a no. still crap... :(

<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><i><div align="right"><font color="red">i haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...</font id="red">
tower82.randparkridge.jhb|13% signal|256k package</div id="right"></i></font id="size1">
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X