I honestly do not understand the point of BEE, especially in South Africa.
You only have so many whites, indians, chinese and other non-black people, if you actively avoid hiring black people eventually you won't have enough people to run a company with.
But this is the problem, don't build and start new businesses no that's way too much work. Rather just force other businesses to conform to your racist policies and eventually drive them into the ground or better yet, think of some stupid lock down rules, bankrupt companies and thousands loose their jobs in the process.
Let businesses do what they do best, make money, by hiring the best person for the job. Once a business thrives, the community around the business thrives, hell that's how towns like Vanderbijlpark started and was a succesfull town up untill the 2000s and then everything went to ****.
Because 27yrs later the hiring best person for the job isn’t really happening. Seriously. Travel in Cpt from company to company, even certain industries or sectors when government/municipality run, scour their employment resumes and you will often find two things..
1. Skilled labour used inappropriately for a pittance and it makes little sense,
2. Unskilled labour used in a skilled position where it makes little to no sense and the appropriate skilled person is doing something arbitrary. This is usually in office administration or clerical positions but you see it throughout org. Excuse is often lazy, no ambition etc.
And what u find is that racial policy or thought of it in the leadership of the company or organization compounds this on race.
Why I use Cpt? Because it’s where I still see these extremes appearing as common. I’ve only worked and lived in three major metros / cities.
Jhb-Pta megalopolis I’d say you could getaway with hiring the best person for job and as long as diversity is part of company policy(you still need it to be because people are people).. you won’t need to worry about explicitly applying b—bee. One thing I loved about Jhb was people, white black or even green(joking) are always striving to study and do more even when they a laborer or receptionist.. in Cpt it seems people give up.
Why? Because if you look generally in Cpt you only see 1 type of person on top positions. You can go back to many of my posts on what makes social mobility and diversity work or just search of proper studies on it and a major contributor is view on world(from where you work to where you stay). When the view on world excludes your race generally in good positions.. people give up on that as a dream.
Management teams in SA though are unfortunately a tough one to claim transformation particularly in the SME side of things because there is a general lack. This you find is gotten around with most of these not doing business with gov or sa..
Anyway this part of takes time to develop, ie 15-40yrs.. so while it was easier to get away with it in the 90s, it’s exceptionally hard to claim it now. Quite often excuses range from talent pool only being so big but it’s in part opportunity as grooming management takes 5-15yrs of career planning & opportunity and when so few do it.. well u get a tiny talent pool.
Getting back to EE policies, much like every other thing gov does.. it makes sense to be lesser harsh on parts of the economy.. the problem is that in 2021, you will find companies which are harshly opposed to a diversified workforce. These bad actors seem to also have the biggest mouths.. this forum as I keep saying is a great example, and so you kinda go.. **** it, let them suffer. Now if I say that.. what does gov and political elements like eff say.
Wrt “you only have so many x, y and z people” that’s what you’d think right. What I find hilarious lately, like over the last decade, is that the number of incidences where an administration staff screws over the company epically is becoming the norm to find(our decade of fraud and corruption is not just government).
And the part i find funny is that many times it’s where “trust” was given due to the staff member being white. I’ve see. In multinationals(who then proceed to sweep under carpet) or smaller companies(where founder old they just sell up after) and I can’t help but think it’s a brutal lesson to learn when the exec is old especially where they own the company.
Anyway..