Springboks as a political tool.

[Cray]

White guilt will be the end of whites. It is a devastating weapon that worked better than expected by those who wield it. The UK is not the UK anymore because of the instilled white guilt, as is most of Europe, as well as Canada. The USA whites are trying to save itself with Trump, but I think they are also too far gone to ever recover. What is the reason for installing this weapon of white guilt globally? The answer is simple. It is the same answer as to why the Neanderthals went extinct.

Did you just compare yourself to a Neanderthal?

 

[lexity]

White guilt will be the end of whites. It is a devastating weapon that worked better than expected by those who wield it. The UK is not the UK anymore because of the instilled white guilt, as is most of Europe, as well as Canada. The USA whites are trying to save itself with Trump, but I think they are also too far gone to ever recover. What is the reason for installing this weapon of white guilt globally? The answer is simple. It is the same answer as to why the Neanderthals went extinct.

Are the Neanderthals extinct, tho'????

Der-der-der-der, der-der-der-der......

Seriously, I think it is more a case of who is more useful to the parasite class.

When it comes to foreign policy? The Right. When in comes to domestic policy? The Left.

That is how the parasitic political class extends their top-down rule over their allegedly equal before the law fellow citizens.

 

[lexity]

When 13s didn't need body-building.....

 

[R13...]

I do apologize. I did not mean to raise a monster when I revived this thread.

 

[Benedict A55h0le not]

Are the Neanderthals extinct, tho'????

Yes, the Neanderthal is extinct. The genes are still found in whites, but these genes are in progress to extinction along with the white skinned homo-sapiens. But it is fine, lets watch the Springbokke.

 

[Benedict A55h0le not]

And the majority on this forum are actively wielding the white-guilt weapon every day. You see them, the laughing emojis to my posts. We are not supposed to beware of their hateful white-guilt weapon. If we are aware of it the effectiveness will wane, and they can`t have that until there is a new world order with all whites being 2nd rate citizens like in SA. Even better for them would be complete extinction.

 

[lexity]

And the majority on this forum are actively wielding the white-guilt weapon every day. You see them, the laughing emojis to my posts. We are not supposed to beware of their hateful white-guilt weapon. If we are aware of it the effectiveness will wane, and they can`t have that until there is a new world order with all whites being 2nd rate citizens like in SA. Even better for them would be complete extinction.

Anyone familiar with the decline of Rome will see some striking similarities. That's for sure.

Bread and circuses.

Decadence.

Inflation/debasement of the currency

Corruption.

Oh, and like Rome, the empire requires expansion at an ever increasing, frantic rate.

It's far more global than Rome, though.

p.s. If you really want a cold hard snot-klap, read Nineteen-eighty-four, by George Orwell. It includes the surveillance aspect.

 

[Benedict A55h0le not]

Anyone familiar with the decline of Rome will see some striking similarities. That's for sure.

Bread and circuses.

Decadence.

Inflation/debasement of the currency

Corruption.

Oh, and like Rome, the empire requires expansion at an ever increasing, frantic rate.

It's far more global than Rome, though.

p.s. If you really want a cold hard snot-klap, read Nineteen-eighty-four, by George Orwell. It includes the surveillance aspect.

The Roman Empire never really collapsed. The values and culture of Rome went global and morphed into the Western culture. The expansion of the Western Rome-like culture is expanding. Soon Iran will join this culture in an official capacity.

 

[porchrat]

Many instances of force are legal but not moral, and therefore illegitimate..

Morality is subjective. It's why laws differ across the globe.

I'm glad for example that we don't all have to live by your moral compass. I imagine there's some wacky stuff in there.

 

[lexity]

The Roman Empire never really collapsed. The values and culture of Rome went global and morphed into the Western culture. The expansion of the Western Rome-like culture is expanding. Soon Iran will join this culture in an official capacity.

It's true that not everything about Rome was lost.

But I don't know how you can say it never really collapsed.

The city if Rome itself took 1000 years before it could sustain a million people again.


Empires always collapse. They are like large-scale military Ponzi schemes. As soon as there are no new conquered territories, the booty dries up. They don't ever create, they only take.


Maniacal global, expansionist, wannabe controllers tend to be divorced from the reality of what makes a thriving, sustainable society. Their nihilistic outlook prevents them from appreciating this.

They're essentially control-freaks. Just witnessing individuals around them not dependent on them is enough to drive them nuts.

A sustainable flourishing society cannot be centrally-planned. Only truly grass-roots economies are sustainable.

Morally homogenous groups that form on the basis of a well-defined moral core is the way to go. And this is no novelty. We have proved this over and over again. We just haven't learned to protect the group from infiltrators yet. That's the lesson we in the West need to learn... how to say NO to the nihilistic among us.


So, yes..... this Anglo-American empire is on a crash course, too.


p.s. RSA's Rainbow project was a blueprint for how this nihilistic bunch wants to run the world. The Springboks is a huge part of distracting the masses from the failure inherent in central-planning. It's the circuses part of the 'bread and circuses' of Rome.

I get it if you are a Springbok fan, it's very much needed distraction, because one tends to feel a bit helpless when looking at the overall trajectory.

 

[lexity]

Morality is subjective. It's why laws differ across the globe.

Yes. it is subjective. But there has been a concerted effort to prevent a free market in rule-sets..... which has been quite successful. So when you say: "It's why laws differ across the globe," ofc there is some truth to that but it's like controlled opposition where there is no real open competition, no genuine choice on offer.

Can you for instance count, on one hand, the number of jurisdictions which implement 'equality before the law'?

Probably not even on one finger.

I'm glad for example that we don't all have to live by your moral compass.

I agree, although it seems me expecting the same civil courtesy i.e. not forcing your rules onto me, is asking a bit much.

I imagine there's some wacky stuff in there.

"Don't start fights and don't take other people's stuff. And nobody gets a pass from these two rules."

Otherwise start your own jurisdiction

That's basically my moral code. And with it, you have a solid foundation to build a legal system that punishes personal aggression and property rights violations, and you have equality before the law.

I am under no illusion. The above moral code scares the living daylights out of those who cannot imagine themselves having to keep their mitts to themselves, as an equal among others.

But fortunately, you don't have to have a one-size-fits-all rule-set. You can have as many differing rule-sets as people are willing to set up for themselves. If this were the norm, we would all be richer and wiser for it

 

[porchrat]

Yes. it is subjective.

Well there you go then. The reality of the rules in SA is abortions don't count. Suck it up buttercup.

I agree, although it seems me expecting the same civil courtesy i.e. not forcing your rules onto me, is asking a bit much.

Nobody is forcing anything on to you. You are free to leave at any point. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Nobody is holding a gun to your head saying you must stay here in good old SA.

You prefer the rules elsewhere then go there.

 

[lexity]

Well there you go then. The reality of the rules in SA is abortions don't count. Suck it up buttercup.


Nobody is forcing anything on to you. You are free to leave at any point. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Nobody is holding a gun to your head saying you must stay here in good old SA.

You prefer the rules elsewhere then go there.

You need to read my entire reply, if you want me to take your posts seriously.

It points out the flaw in the thinking highlighted in bold.

 

[vigras rojara]

And the majority on this forum are actively wielding the white-guilt weapon every day. You see them, the laughing emojis to my posts. We are not supposed to beware of their hateful white-guilt weapon. If we are aware of it the effectiveness will wane, and they can`t have that until there is a new world order with all whites being 2nd rate citizens like in SA. Even better for them would be complete extinction.

Time to head for the pharmacy to collect your meds. With any luck you'll bump into lex in the queue, and you can both continue your insane ramblings in person.

 

[porchrat]

You need to read my entire reply, if you want me to take your posts seriously.

It points out the flaw in the thinking highlighted in bold.

Not really no. When you go to a place you're agreeing to live by the rules of that place. If you don't want to live by those rules in the place those people own and are allowing you into then leave. Simple as.

You want to stay in SA? Cool. Here are the rules. Abide or leave.

 

[lexity]

You want to stay in SA? Cool. Here are the rules. Abide or leave.

Sorry, I don't think as many people are going to take your thuggish dogmatism as well as you expect.

Forcing your rules on others is generally considered to be anti-social behavior.

The ANC itself would have to completely embarrass themselves to openly ignore their commitment to self-determination in SA.... signed and ratified:

 

[porchrat]

Sorry, I don't think as many people are going to take your thuggish dogmatism as well as you expect.

Forcing your rules on others is generally considered to be anti-social behavior.

Again, nobody is forcing anything onto you. You are free to leave at any point. You don't like the SA Constitution? You don't like SA's rules? Go somewhere else if you don't like the rules here. You agree to abide by the rules of an area or you can't live there.

If I go to Aus I expect to live by their rules. Simple as. In fact letting me in the door inherently involves me accepting their rules.

 

[lexity]

Again, nobody is forcing anything onto you. You are free to leave at any point. You don't like the SA Constitution? You don't like SA's rules? Go somewhere else if you don't like the rules here. You agree to abide by the rules of an area or you can't live there.

If I go to Aus I expect to live by their rules. Simple as. In fact letting me in the door inherently involves me accepting their rules.

We have had this discussion many times before.

Expecting millions of SAns who have built their lives, with families going back hundreds of years, to get up and leave if they don't like the new rules which are an assault on private property rights..... is thuggish.

In Western culture, people who act on this attitude belong in prison.

Your brutish like it or leave attitude, carries a heavy anti-social stench.

But keep digging.

 

[lexity]

Article from a couple of years ago which talks about the state of transformation within the Springboks setup...

Are the Springboks still 'too white'?

A South African Rugby Union report has indicated that the World Champion Springboks have not achieved the desired level of transformation.

www.ewn.co.za

 

[lexity]

For the record, abortion is either illegal/legal depending what stage the pregnancy is.

So we can obviously say that at some stage it constitutes an act of violence legally.... against an innocent unborn child.

Morally, on the other hand, people can and do say that, regardless of when you forcibly stop the heart from beating in your unborn child, you stopped it from beating... which is an act of violence.

So the entire GBV campaign is political. It's designed to achieve something that benefits the political class.

It's a shame that Siya gets dragged into doing the dirty work of the political class.

p.s. Making women more dependent on the State is the exact opposite of empowerment.