South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Tap on whose head? Who made the remark, Spur, the parties or witnesses involved?

My stance is that this guy reacted in an understandable way to the situation.What is the stance you made in this case with all the evidence in the open?
Then there is the question, is it the same kid?
Pony tail, straightened hair... the colour tone...
Weird that Spur wouldn't have caught that on their videos and mentioned something when they banned the guy.
Even if you are right, this man with previous incidents counting against him
Where do we get this information?
Yah well, somebody put another little girl out in the public spotlight to stroke their own ego. This is not healthy, some people seriously needs help.
The situation being that his kid was hit by hers and she essentially told him to f--k off when he confronted her about it.
My stance is that this guy reacted in an understandable way to the situation.
The situation being that his kid was hit by hers and she essentially told him to f--k off when he confronted her about it.
Thus the unrelenting accusations of sexism and racism are unfounded.
Remember the outrage when a black kid in KZN was shot by a farmer? And remember how quickly it died out when it turned out the farmer was black. Even in this thread there has been posted countless examples of the double standards that exist in society.
A more recent example is this thing with Helen Zille. What she said is child's play compared to what Malema has sprouted over the years(you know calling for violence against white people). Yet one standard exists for him because he is black, and one standard exists for black people.
http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/malema-not-calling-for-the-slaughter-of-whites-for-now-2087713
I don't particularly see what is wrong with making a stance with all the evidence in the open for you to see.
Yah well, somebody put another little girl out in the public spotlight to stroke their own ego. This is not healthy, some people seriously needs help.
My stance is that this guy reacted in an understandable way to the situation.
The situation being that his kid was hit by hers and she essentially told him to f--k off when he confronted her about it.
Thus the unrelenting accusations of sexism and racism are unfounded.
You can conclude that this is exactly what happened according to what evidence exactly? Who have you chosen to believe, and why?
this is it, plain and simple.
Did he not grab her kid prior to her telling him to leave and **** off?
:crylaugh:
Another what, exactly? I assume you missed my comic sans.
You can conclude that this is exactly what happened according to what evidence exactly? Who have you chosen to believe, and why?

My stance is that this guy reacted in an understandable way to the situation.
The situation being that his kid was hit by hers and she essentially told him to f--k off when he confronted her about it.
Thus the unrelenting accusations of sexism and racism are unfounded.
this is it, plain and simple.
And you guys have conclusive proof of this do you? What about her claims that the guy grabbed her child violently as well as Spur's media statement agreeing with her version of events according to CCTV footage?
Care to share it with the rest of us?