Spur Incident

ummmm ... an intelligently made argument where the go to response is SJW or cuck ... as in this post of yours perhaps ... ? maybe give those of us intellectually inferior individuals an example to work with

The thickness thickens.

Someone asked for my take on the use of the term "SJW", I did.
 
The thickness thickens.

Someone asked for my take on the use of the term "SJW", I did.
Sure I'm thick as pigshidt ... how about helping me out with an example of one of those intelligently made arguments where the go to response is "SJW" or "cuck".? Should be easy for someone as intellectually superior as you
 
Last edited:
I have yet to see a coherent argument made by someone who is a radical left wing activist gripped by extreme compassion. That is what SJW are if you take a step back and look at them as objectively as possible.

Oh so it's not someone who would say have compassion for innocent civilians being killed in Iraq? Not someone who finds compassion for anybody outside their race group or gender? Then why are people who display this called SJW's immediately? Your definition of the term is in direct conflict with the context in which the term is used.

I have provided quite a wide sample of the typical arguments that SJW talk about, if you can provide a good argument or topic that somone who you classify as a SJW would make, I am all for it.

Once again, this label has been used by racists, bigots and generally stupid people to describe others who have compassion for people who look different and may belong to different parts of society or religion etc. That is my point, the uneducated spew this term out over and over because they lack any kind of ability to address the facts at hand. Someone call Donald Trump an immature child for threatening to kill the families of terrorists? "cuck!" or "SJW!!!". No thought behind it, just playground level tactics where if we keep using these stupid terms, we don't have to explain ourselves, they're powerful enough in and of themselves... well at least to the simple minded they are.

Here is an example for you to do if you battle with such a concept:
According to Cloudster, someone who is a SJW according to konfab would say the following:__________________

I have no desire to look any further into your way of thinking. You have proven yourself a simpleton and delving any deeper into what your motivations are will not serve me or improve me in any way. I will continue to call you out on your foolish comments though.
 
Oh so it's not someone who would say have compassion for innocent civilians being killed in Iraq? Not someone who finds compassion for anybody outside their race group or gender? Then why are people who display this called SJW's immediately? Your definition of the term is in direct conflict with the context in which the term is used.

Ok. So do you have so much compassion that you let every beggar that comes to your gate into your house and allow them to sleep in your bed?
Do you shell out R100 notes to the drug addict on the side of the road?

There is an element of compassion that is needed for people, but it is dangerously naive to assume that too much compassion is a good thing. In fact it is the very thing that allows bullies to thrive..
 
Sure I'm think as pigshidt ... how about helping me out with an example of one of those intelligently made arguments where the go to response is "SJW" or "cuck".? Should be easy for someone as intellectually superior as you

This is why you don't argue with imbeciles, they will continue to go on and on about something you've addressed. You obviously have no idea what I'm talking about and it will take your brain a couple of hours (or days) to catch up with what happened here.

Let me spell it out for you, these responses are responses I've seen over many mediums, used in various arguments. This is an account of my experiences regarding this matter. I'm not going to go on a mission to find these posts and conversations held on other mediums.
 
This is why you don't argue with imbeciles, they will continue to go on and on about something you've addressed. You obviously have no idea what I'm talking about and it will take your brain a couple of hours (or days) to catch up with what happened here.

Let me spell it out for you, these responses are responses I've seen over many mediums, used in various arguments. This is an account of my experiences regarding this matter. I'm not going to go on a mission to find these posts and conversations held on other mediums.
Careful you don't trip over your superiority complex there pal

Cloudster said:
I have no desire to look any further into your way of thinking.
The very thing SJW's the world-over vehemently accuse everyone else of not doing :whistle:
 
This is why you don't argue with imbeciles, they will continue to go on and on about something you've addressed. You obviously have no idea what I'm talking about and it will take your brain a couple of hours (or days) to catch up with what happened here.

Let me spell it out for you, these responses are responses I've seen over many mediums, used in various arguments. This is an account of my experiences regarding this matter. I'm not going to go on a mission to find these posts and conversations held on other mediums.

You don't even want to provide one tiny little arguement? What are you scared of?

Confront us evil alt-righters, show us who is boss. SLAY THE DRAGON THAT IS HOLDING YOU BACK.

cleaning your room might be a good place to start though.
 
Ok. So do you have so much compassion that you let every beggar that comes to your gate into your house and allow them to sleep in your bed?
Do you shell out R100 notes to the drug addict on the side of the road?

Erm you see what you did there? You have just proven my point, nobody said anything about letting homeless people in to live at my house at will or handing out tons of cash at robots to addics.

Now how do you have an intelligent conversation with someone who thinks like you do? You jump to conclusions at every turn, you conclude that which you have insufficient evidence to conclude and herein lies the core of your lack of compassion, ignorance and plain stupidity.


There is an element of compassion that is needed for people, but it is dangerously naive to assume that too much compassion is a good thing. In fact it is the very thing that allows bullies to thrive..

Again, just wild assumptions based on nothing.. where and why did you conclude this? Where is this model of SUPER compassion coming from?

This just makes no sense... no sense at all and that's why it is so difficult to try and reason with this way of thinking.
 
SJW, a term used by people who cannot hold a converstation to force people wiht a different point of view out of the discussion.

the original term was for complete retards online, but it has been appropriated by the above, lucky, they fit into the same classification.
 
SJW, a term used by people who cannot hold a converstation to force people wiht a different point of view out of the discussion.

the original term was for complete retards online, but it has been appropriated by the above, lucky, they fit into the same classification.

Wrong, a social justice warrior is somebody that looks for equality of outcome rather than pure equality and in this case, justice of outcome where the evil man who allegedly beats woman deserves to be banned from Spur while the poor victim who did nothing to avoid the confrontation and clearly didn't antagonize an already infuriated man should be protected at all costs. I will say it again, STOP FOCUSING ON THE PEOPLE INVOLVED AND DEAL WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE. Person A confronts Person B, not in a civil way mind you. Person B, instead of trying to appease person A, insults and verbally assault Person A. Because of these actions Person A is further antagonized to the point of physical violence. Can we just agree that this point was the end of a series of events that started off on the wrong foot, but was not the sole responsibility of Person A.
 
Erm you see what you did there? You have just proven my point, nobody said anything about letting homeless people in to live at my house at will or handing out tons of cash at robots to addicts

Fine, lets use the argument of refugees if you want a fine point of over-compassion.

The Syrian war has generated millions of war refugees. Everyone, everyone agrees that this is a bad thing. The "compassionate" thing as most left wing politicians will tell you to do is to accept as many refugees as you can take into your country. Now removing the huge cultural effects this might have on the places where they are going to lets look at what this practice is doing to the Syrians themselves.

1) The people who are desperately needed to rebuild Syrian society (such as the doctors, nurses and engineers) are usually the people who have the most capability of leaving. Which means the moment you start absorbing these people, you are robbing the society where they come from of the people they need to rebuild. I would wager Syria needs its doctors and engineers far more than Germany does.

2) Unskilled people coming in from the third world are unlikely to find employment because of language, skills and cultural differences. This means that they will most likely be dependant on the welfare state. That is all well and good, except you have to take into account that only a tiny minority of people from these areas will ever be able to make it to Europe and elsewhere. This means that the majority of people are not being helped by a country taking in refugees. The only way you can help the majority of people is to channel foreign aid into refugee camps and to try and stabilize the country. Countries that load refugees on their welfare systems are essentially helping a minority of people at the cost of a majority because it looks better to the public.


Calling people racist and bigoted because they don't want to help people in the way that you want doesn't help anyone.
 
SJW, a term used by people who cannot hold a converstation to force people wiht a different point of view out of the discussion.

the original term was for complete retards online, but it has been appropriated by the above, lucky, they fit into the same classification.

Good you have showed up.

Why don't you make that argument for genocide again. Given it is just a different point of view.
 
Everyone on Mybroadband thinks they are ****ing Stephen Hawking but in the end we are all just dumb as pig **** for arguing on the internet.
 
Wrong, a social justice warrior is somebody that looks for equality of outcome rather than pure equality and in this case, justice of outcome where the evil man who allegedly beats woman deserves to be banned from Spur while the poor victim who did nothing to avoid the confrontation and clearly didn't antagonize an already infuriated man should be protected at all costs. I will say it again, STOP FOCUSING ON THE PEOPLE INVOLVED AND DEAL WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE. Person A confronts Person B, not in a civil way mind you. Person B, instead of trying to appease person A, insults and verbally assault Person A. Because of these actions Person A is further antagonized to the point of physical violence. Can we just agree that this point was the end of a series of events that started off on the wrong foot, but was not the sole responsibility of Person A.

see, you are not reading what I am saying.
I am saying people call others who have a different option to them a SJW.

I mean FFS, I was called a SJW, WHILE my argument was "invalid" because I want an exterminatus on the planet.


also remember, my point was the man does not deserve to be defended.
I did also say the women should have also been banned.
but everyone, you included decided to gloss over that and call me an SJW instead completly ignoring everything else.

because the only thing worse than actually being an SJW, is being that kind of person that calls others an SJW.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X