Excalibur
Executive Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,622
- Reaction score
- 1,782
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
All 3 persons contained in this post must end
I think there's a good reason you are here and he is up there.Farcical commission continues with the idiot Zondo at the helm
So, Zuma has managed to show up for this recusal application but you can bet he'll spin his excuse wheel as soon as this application is denied and he's required to appear as a witness.
He's probably intending to Stalingrad this until the commission has no choice but to wrap up without his testimony. He'll then turn around and dispute the outcome because "he wasn't given a chance" to give his side of the story.He'll just have a failure to remember anything of any use, and spin useless conspiracy crap till the cows come home if he ever does have to actually appear as a witness
He's probably intending to Stalingrad this until the commission has no choice but to wrap up without his testimony. He'll then turn around and dispute the outcome because "he wasn't given a chance" to give his side of the story.
More nonsense from excalibur. Its a 2 year old video of his rapist father which has nothing to do with the state capture commission.
Hahahahaha! Suck it loser.
Zuma appointed Zondo to head the state capture commission. He saw Zondo as his friend which means he wanted a friend not to find him guilty. That is the whole idea of state capture. Appointing people who are loyal. However, because unlike the PP and the NPA, the state capture is live broadcast on television and a judge has to be impartial, it means Zondo can't be biased for Zuma.![]()
Zuma insists Zondo is his 'friend' as ruling on recusal bid is postponed
Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo was due to deliver his decision at 3pm on Wednesday, but that was postponed to 10am on Thursday.ewn.co.za
It's CJ Mogoeng who appointed Zondo to lead the commission.Zuma appointed Zondo to head the state capture commission. He saw Zondo as his friend which means he wanted a friend not to find him guilty. That is the whole idea of state capture. Appointing people who are loyal. However, because unlike the PP and the NPA, the state capture is live broadcast on television and a judge has to be impartial, it means Zondo can't be biased for Zuma.
Now Zuma uses the same reason he wanted Zondo to be biased for him as the reason he is biased against him. This is absurd.
What other legal recourse is there for Zuma to oppose this ruling?Hahahahaha! Suck it loser.
So are they friends or not?