State capture inquiry begins

Excalibur said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1323982064253808641
Click to expand...

Didn't Ramaphosa reassure the ANC with an internal letter that corruption is rooted in Apartheid,

“Corruption has infected the state, undoing the gains of the past 26 years. While the current allegations about corruption in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic have brought this issue to the fore, the reality is that corruption in this country has far deeper roots. Apartheid was both morally and materially corrupt.”

“Even as its laws enabled the theft of resources belonging to the African people, there were many in the administration – including state companies and businesses – who flouted those corrupt laws to enrich themselves. We wanted to overthrow apartheid to bring in a new era of integrity and honesty.”
Click to expand...

he sure did give it a colour.
 
Madam and Eve on Dudu:
DM-Dudu-Myeni-2000px-768x968.jpg
 
Mila said:
Isn’t she incriminating herself by saying that.
Click to expand...
No, guilt cannot be inferred from your silence, but her silence is also not doing anything to her advantage.

When you are implicated that deep in a lot of things it's better to not say too much since you won't know where your evidence could be used against you. That's the dilemma uBaba finds himself in.
 
thechamp said:
No, guilt cannot be inferred from your silence, but her silence is also not doing anything to her advantage.

When you are implicated that deep in a lot of things it's better to not say too much since you won't know where your evidence could be used against you. That's the dilemma uBaba finds himself in.
Click to expand...
The fact that she actually named Mr X is enough to convince the judge that she must be guilty of some wrongdoing. Who explicitly disrespects a directive from the the chairman not once, but twice?

Her conduct and failure to explain even the most basic of questions should be clear that she has something to hide. She even implicitly implied that Zondo himself is being used and the staff working on the commission for him. I don't think that would go down well with him and he will remember that when he deliberates on his findings.
 
thechamp said:
No, guilt cannot be inferred from your silence, but her silence is also not doing anything to her advantage.

When you are implicated that deep in a lot of things it's better to not say too much since you won't know where your evidence could be used against you. That's the dilemma uBaba finds himself in.
Click to expand...
That's the problem with this commission, anything said in it can't be used against you in another court to use as evidence against you. She is in kuk tho about mr x.
 
wingnut771 said:
That's the problem with this commission, anything said in it can't be used against you in another court to use as evidence against you. She is in kuk tho about mr x.
Click to expand...
Evidence from Zondo can and shall be used against you in a prosecution, why do you think Dudu is doing the silence thing?

www.timeslive.co.za

Police can now access state capture inquiry evidence as Ramaphosa changes the rules

Evidence and testimony presented at the state capture inquiry can now be accessed by law enforcement agencies.
www.timeslive.co.za www.timeslive.co.za
 
thechamp said:
Evidence from Zondo can and shall be used against you in a prosecution, why do you think Dudu is doing the silence thing?

www.timeslive.co.za

Police can now access state capture inquiry evidence as Ramaphosa changes the rules

Evidence and testimony presented at the state capture inquiry can now be accessed by law enforcement agencies.
www.timeslive.co.za www.timeslive.co.za
Click to expand...
They can access the evidence yes, it's like saying, I shot him and threw the gun in the river. The prosecution can't use that against you in evidence, but they can go look for the gun in the river.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X