AirWolf
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 24,404
So if it's common practice everywhere, where does she expect the other end of the cable to land?
I mean, if a cable has to be 51% locally controlled, it stands to reason that the most the other country where it lands can control is 49%. Or does she think these things just trail off into the ocean?
My thoughts exactly.
Typical bunch of African governments. They have a population that lives on less than a dollar a day yet want to control a cable they did not even pay for. Fix the basics, that is hard work and what is needed. People need food, electricity, clean water, homes, jobs and education. Stop worrying about the internet it is a nice to have and will give you an advantage but it is not remotely necessary if you don't know where your next meal is going to come from.
If Africa wants to build a billion dollar cable, hey go for it, and when you cannot pay your debts and default on installments all they will do is buy you out or cut off your access.
Good luck SA, you struggle to fix potholes in time - just let the pros do what they do best and get out of the way.
True, but poor communication networks i.e. non-existance of affordable realiable true broadband technology definitely hinders our ability as a country to move forward with development and thereby implementing a self-regeneration program.
Well considering that it is fibre optic cable being discussed, and that the Grim Poisonous Ivyness Creep believes she is the source of all sunshine, it's quite possible that Shope-Mafole is considering propelling her [useless] boss off into the ocean with the other end of the cable firmly rammed up an orifice.
You always seem to have an excellent way with words.