OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 47,031
Jaguares have already won the same amount of games as they did at the end of last season. 
Poor game from both teams, especially from the Lions. Previous game was more exciting by the Stormers
Sunwolves played well. Stormers didn't impress at all, but it's a win for them.
Yep agree... want to see if the Stormers can actually perform when they start meeting proper opposition in the NZ teams
But let's be honest, not one of the SA teams are playing well so far, not even my Lions...![]()
Agree. South African teams are struggling. Our Lions team need to play for 80 mins and not just 40mins.
I predict them relaxing the high tackle yellow card rule again after this season, simply too many yellows and I don't see the disciplen changing any time soon.
This was a poor rugby weekend for all SA teams which is quite a concern, looks like the biggest problem across the board is not playing for the full 80 minuts. Look at the Bulls, 7 all half time and then a hiding of note in the second half. In comparison, usually the NZ teams are able to switch to a even higher gear after 60 - 65 minuts and play with even higher intencity.
Super Rugby: Force out, Kings to stay?
Cape Town - The Western Force's time in Super Rugby is set come to an end, according to a report in Australian media on Monday.
The Daily Telegraph reported that the Force will be the Australian franchise to be cut from the competition - as part of a proposed SANZAAR move to reduce the number of teams from 18 to 15.
As a result the majority of contracted Force players, aside from senior Wallabies in Dane Haylett-Petty and Adam Coleman, will be automatically moved to new franchises by the ARU, according to the report.
Where the move to cut three teams from the competition is stalling comes down to the wait for a decision by South Africa over axing two of their six sides from Super Rugby.
A key SANZAAR meeting is scheduled for April 6, and while there is a general agreement that Super Rugby must be slimmed down to 15 sides, a current stumbling block is reportedly the South African government's backing to keep the Southern Kings involved in the competition, despite low crowds and poor performances on the field.
The Eastern Cape region boasts a strong heritage of black rugby representation and the Kings’ participation of the event is seen as a necessity.
Oupa says sorry for scuffle with Reinach
Cape Town - Cheetahs flank Oupa Mohoje has apologised to Sharks scrumhalf Cobus Reinach after the two were involved in an altercation during Saturday’s South African Super Rugby derby in Bloemfontein.
Mohoje slammed Reinach to the ground in a tackle after the whistle had gone, which caused a scuffle to break out between the two teams.
Mohoje, who was sent to the sin-bin for his actions, took to Twitter to apologise to Reinach:
Teboho Mohoje ✔ @OupsMo
Totally unsportsmanlike what happened earlier today, my apologies on that brother! @c_reinach may it be a blessed season to you
cobus reinach ✔ @c_reinach
Thank you @OupsMo , sorry from my side as well. What happens on the field stays on the field. See you soon champ! https://twitter.com/oupsmo/status/845718234380877825 …
This was a poor rugby weekend for all SA teams which is quite a concern, looks like the biggest problem across the board is not playing for the full 80 minuts. Look at the Bulls, 7 all half time and then a hiding of note in the second half. In comparison, usually the NZ teams are able to switch to a even higher gear after 60 - 65 minuts and play with even higher intencity.
Rugby Union Players Association launches petition to keep five Australian Super Rugby teams
The Rugby Union Players' Association has launched a petition to save Australian rugby's national footprint, warning of "permanent damage" to the game if a Super Rugby team is cut.
As the axe hovers over one of Australia's three smallest professional teams - the Force, Rebels or Brumbies - the players' union is trying to trigger a groundswell of public support to head off any such move.
The petition, entitled "Stronger As Five", warns that agreeing to cut an Australian team as part of a wider Super Rugby shakeup will "signal a retreat" in the competitive Australian sporting market place and also places responsibility for any decision - expected as early as next week - squarely at the feet of the Australian Rugby Union.
"Super Rugby can only change if the ARU votes for it. This is the ARU's call," the petition states.
Continued
There's too much speculation around this. Every day it's different teams being named. Meh.
And what do they mean the players will be moved to "new franchises"? Do they mean the other Aus teams?
DHL Stormers: 15 SP Marais, 14 Cheslin Kolbe, 13 EW Viljoen, 12 Dan du Plessis, 11 Dillyn Leyds, 10 Robert du Preez, 9 Jano Vermaak, 8 Sikhumbuzo Notshe, 7 Siya Kolisi (captain), 6 Cobus Wiese, 5 Pieter-Steph du Toit, 4 Eben Etzebeth (vice captain), 3 Frans Malherbe, 2 Bongi Mbonambi, 1 JC Janse van Rensburg.
Replacements: 16 Ramone Samuels, 17 Caylib Oosthuizen, 18 Oli Kebble, 19 Chris van Zyl, 20 Nizaam Carr, 21 Dewaldt Duvenage, 22 Kurt Coleman, 23 Dan Kriel.
Dean Mumm and co. should leave this discussion up to the stakeholders,
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/...ion-to-keep-five-australian-super-rugby-teams
their rugby is simply not strong enough.
Australia (if I'm correct) don't have a local competition like we have the Currie Cup and NZ has the NPC. For them, Super Rugby is it...