I also came to that conclusion. Its real sad but true.Here is the breakdown :
- Group A, wants to work with the authorities, since it is the more important for them to get the funds out and not making a big fuss
- Group A has no intention of exposing the authorities
- Group A wants the people who assisted with the process to get their monies
- Group A wants to change people's lives
- Group A's leadership has 100% evidence of the money including actual bank accounts/Statements in the name of Surtie
- Group A wants to assist the country
- Group B, don't want to work with authorities, since doing the right thing of exposing the authorities is more important than getting the money. They have threaten the authorities countless times without any constructive conclusion
- Group B, wants to expose the authorities
- Group B wants the people who assisted to get their monies, but they want to do the payout themselves
- Group B also wants to change people's lives
- Group B has 85% of the evidence that Group A has
- Group B wants to assist the country
Its clear that there is some mutual grounds here, but we are playing in the backyard of people who has their own rules.
What is the meaning of insanity ? Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome.
Group A were warned by Group B too let go or face jailtime!