Tax hikes coming

KillerX

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
27
Location
Bloemfontein
http://www.fin24.com/articles/default/display_article.aspx?Channel=News_Home&ArticleId=1518-25_2548207


Johannesburg - The tax burden on South Africa's few million taxpayers will ramp up by about another 9% to fund government's grandiose plans for social grants.

There are only 5.3m taxpayers in the country and 1.2m of these pay 75% of all personal and company tax collected.

"These people will be expected to fork out an extra R210bn to finance the government's proposed social security fund (National Security Savings Fund), national healthcare (National Health Insurance) and a basic income for the unemployed.

"This will increase government expenditure from about 31% to more than 40% of the gross domestic product, and the tax burden of only a few million people from 27% to 37%," observes Economists.co.za Economist Mike SchĂĽssler.

"This is unsustainable for a country with the smallest number of taxpayers and the highest rate of taxation," he argues.

During last week he participated in a panel discussion on the affordability of the National Security Savings Fund designed by Old Mutual Actuaries & Consultants (Omac).

According to SchĂĽssler's calculations, the National Security Savings Fund will draw an additional R80bn a year from the fiscus, the National Health Insurance R80bn, and the basic income grant R50bn.

As matters stand, South Africa is already the country with the highest proportion of people depending on social grants.

Currently 13m or 26% of the population depend on these grants. In other words, each taxpayer is responsible for two people's social grants.

The government's plans for an income grant to the unemployed will add another seven million to the list of dependants.

A spike in taxation and contributions to retirement and medical funds is unavoidable if the plans for a social security fund and the national health plan are to be realised.

SchĂĽssler says that in 2006 R84bn was paid out in old-age pensions to 2.4m recipients. This figure could double within the social security fund.

Selwyn Jehoma, another panel member and head of overall social welfare at the Department of Social Development, disagrees on what the social security fund will cost.

He says the social security fund will not involve the fiscus in additional expenditure because more people will be contributing. He estimates that seven to nine million working in the formal sector will contribute.

"Initially it will cost money to set up the infrastructure, but within the first five to ten years enough money will have been accumulated in the fund to finance the payouts."

One of the biggest challenges the National Security Savings Fund will face is how to prevent the rich taking advantage of the poor's savings. The death rate among the poor is high, and this will mean that they do not need retirement funding. Depending on how the fund is constituted, contributions by the poor will benefit the rich.

Jehoma reckons that about seven million will qualify for an income grant.

SchĂĽssler says the national health system will cost up to R200bn. Currently the government is spending R52bn on healthcare and R74bn is being contributed to medical schemes.

This, he says, could cost R3 000 to R4 000 a month. For people in the lower income groups who are currently paying no tax at all this would absorb half of their salaries.
 
I belive the time has come to start increasing VAt...


Rather push vat upto 17% .. is promote's business and collect's tax from everyone....
 
Erm ... :confused:
This reminds me of when the ANC first came into power.

We said :
Step 1 : EDUCATION.

ANC said :
Step 1 : BEE

Result = 4000 really really rich black people.

Now the ANC needs more money because there are not enough skilled people out there making new businesses and new opportunities because of lack of education.

So, we're saying:
Step 1: EDUCATION dammit!

ANC is saying:
Step 1: Money handouts.

= long term fail.

I am NOT happy with paying 75% personal tax while my retired parents and unemployed friends cannot claim their fair share of the pool.

:mad:
 
Tax the everloving **** out of the group of people that don't support the ANC, give a bit of that money to the group that does support the ANC, and next time round the ANC wins again.

Now why the hell should the first group stay and take this kind of abuse?
 
I actually want a study done, how many DA voters pay tax vs how many ANC voters pay tax.
 
http://www.fin24.com/articles/default/display_article.aspx?Channel=News_Home&ArticleId=1518-25_2548207


Johannesburg - The tax burden on South Africa's few million taxpayers will ramp up by about another 9% to fund government's grandiose plans for social grants.

There are only 5.3m taxpayers in the country and 1.2m of these pay 75% of all personal and company tax collected.

"These people will be expected to fork out an extra R210bn to finance the government's proposed social security fund (National Security Savings Fund), national healthcare (National Health Insurance) and a basic income for the unemployed.

"This will increase government expenditure from about 31% to more than 40% of the gross domestic product, and the tax burden of only a few million people from 27% to 37%," observes Economists.co.za Economist Mike SchĂĽssler.

"This is unsustainable for a country with the smallest number of taxpayers and the highest rate of taxation," he argues.

During last week he participated in a panel discussion on the affordability of the National Security Savings Fund designed by Old Mutual Actuaries & Consultants (Omac).

According to SchĂĽssler's calculations, the National Security Savings Fund will draw an additional R80bn a year from the fiscus, the National Health Insurance R80bn, and the basic income grant R50bn.

As matters stand, South Africa is already the country with the highest proportion of people depending on social grants.

Currently 13m or 26% of the population depend on these grants. In other words, each taxpayer is responsible for two people's social grants.

The government's plans for an income grant to the unemployed will add another seven million to the list of dependants.

A spike in taxation and contributions to retirement and medical funds is unavoidable if the plans for a social security fund and the national health plan are to be realised.

SchĂĽssler says that in 2006 R84bn was paid out in old-age pensions to 2.4m recipients. This figure could double within the social security fund.

Selwyn Jehoma, another panel member and head of overall social welfare at the Department of Social Development, disagrees on what the social security fund will cost.

He says the social security fund will not involve the fiscus in additional expenditure because more people will be contributing. He estimates that seven to nine million working in the formal sector will contribute.

"Initially it will cost money to set up the infrastructure, but within the first five to ten years enough money will have been accumulated in the fund to finance the payouts."

One of the biggest challenges the National Security Savings Fund will face is how to prevent the rich taking advantage of the poor's savings. The death rate among the poor is high, and this will mean that they do not need retirement funding. Depending on how the fund is constituted, contributions by the poor will benefit the rich.

Jehoma reckons that about seven million will qualify for an income grant.

SchĂĽssler says the national health system will cost up to R200bn. Currently the government is spending R52bn on healthcare and R74bn is being contributed to medical schemes.

This, he says, could cost R3 000 to R4 000 a month. For people in the lower income groups who are currently paying no tax at all this would absorb half of their salaries.


this thread comes to mind again... Burden too big for tax payers
 
They can tax us all they like, but to be fair every taxpayer should get an additional vote for every 1K they pay each month. This means that if they increase it and I now pay 7K instead of 5K I will have 7 additional votes next time it is election.
 
They can tax us all they like, but to be fair every taxpayer should get an additional vote for every 1K they pay each month. This means that if they increase it and I now pay 7K instead of 5K I will have 7 additional votes next time it is election.

I Agree.
 
Another move that will drive more taxpayers to leave the country. :-( Reducing the amount of people sharing the burden.
 
Is there something we can do about it? I cannot ask my company to stop deducting tax so we can start to boycott them..

So what can we do?
 
Run amok in the city center and turn over trash cans, comes to mind...... Oh wait, that's just going to destroy stuff and make the problem worse. :-(
 
Reverse BEE, don't employ ANC members, refuse to pay "consulting fees" to government tenders. Offer benefits to people to switch parties, show that the alternates are better than the current bunch.
 
So with a 9% increase i need to get a 9% increase in my salary to be taking home the same amount. In these times its quite hard to get a 9% increase :(
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X