South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Anyone else wondering if May might just respond to such a threat by triggering article 50 earlier than the 29th?
Not that a post-brexit world would have made any difference to this sort of attack, just that it plays into the concerns that motivated brexit in the first place.
Anyone else wondering if May might just respond to such a threat by triggering article 50 earlier than the 29th?
Not that a post-brexit world would have made any difference to this sort of attack, just that it plays into the concerns that motivated brexit in the first place.
Nothing in reality, psychologically it could change the people's resolve quite a bit. Doing it early, in the face of such an attack, sends the message that Britain believes it is best equipped to fight terror as an independent nation state. That Britain was right to exit the EU which is bending over backwards to let these attacks happen in the name of helping "refugees", and Britain will be safer once it is again the master of its own domain.What would it change except the Brexit being in effect on 22 March 2019 or on 29 March 2019 ?
That would mostly look very amateur.
You never heard the rhetoric of controlling Britain's borders again during the referendum campaigns?!? :wtf:I don't even see the link between this terrorist act and Brexit...
Are you thinking that the attack was carried out in the name of the EU?![]()
The number includes the police officer who was stabbed and his attacker, Scotland Yard's top anti-terror officer Mark Rowley said.
The other two victims are understood to have died on the bridge, he added.
He also said at least 20 people had been injured.
Mr Rowley also said police believed there to have been only one suspect, although he said they were carrying out thorough checks.
The attacker rammed a car into members of the public on Westminster Bridge before entering the grounds of the Houses of Parliament and stabbing a police officer before he was shot.
Eyewitnesses described scenes of terror when gunfire rang out as the attacker approached a second officer within yards of the Houses of Parliament.
You never heard the rhetoric of controlling Britain's borders again during the referendum campaigns?!? :wtf:
Do you think this cretin was a British born citizen or did he somehow cross the very borders that were being debated during brexit?
1 + 1 = ?
You never heard the rhetoric of controlling Britain's borders again during the referendum campaigns?!? :wtf:
Do you think this cretin was a British born citizen or did he somehow cross the very borders that were being debated during brexit?
1 + 1 = ?
That's some weak sarcasm right there :crylaugh:So you're in the UK's IC loop on the perps identity. Awesome. What's his name and where's he from?
Link to where it's been established he isn't British or legally in the country from somewhere like Pakistan...
That's some weak sarcasm right there :crylaugh:
The terrorist version of Coulter's law is currently in effect, feel free to bet against the inevitable conclusion.
Yeah, because a people that's just been terrorized is going to insist on facts before drawing conclusions ... :crylaugh:
Trump having a field day now, words coming out of his mouth, "I told you".
He will probably get support for his comments to ban Muslims for the US.![]()
These fools are achieving just the opposite from their objective. I was living in London in 2005. I was on Tower Bridge tube station platform when the bomb went off at Aldgate just one station away. It was scary and I will never forget the sight of an empty Trafalgar Square being traversed by a lone military truck. It was amazing the way the British pulled together afterwards. They are a strong people.